All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>,
	"Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>,
	Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15.y] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: C-flag: handle late ADD_ADDR
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 16:22:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251113152256.3075806-2-matttbe@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025102646-unwary-premises-4a2c@gregkh>

[ Upstream commit e84cb860ac3ce67ec6ecc364433fd5b412c448bc ]

The special C-flag case expects the ADD_ADDR to be received when
switching to 'fully-established'. But for various reasons, the ADD_ADDR
could be sent after the "4th ACK", and the special case doesn't work.

On NIPA, the new test validating this special case for the C-flag failed
a few times, e.g.

  102 default limits, server deny join id 0
        syn rx                 [FAIL] got 0 JOIN[s] syn rx expected 2

  Server ns stats
  (...)
  MPTcpExtAddAddrTx  1
  MPTcpExtEchoAdd    1

  Client ns stats
  (...)
  MPTcpExtAddAddr    1
  MPTcpExtEchoAddTx  1

        synack rx              [FAIL] got 0 JOIN[s] synack rx expected 2
        ack rx                 [FAIL] got 0 JOIN[s] ack rx expected 2
        join Rx                [FAIL] see above
        syn tx                 [FAIL] got 0 JOIN[s] syn tx expected 2
        join Tx                [FAIL] see above

I had a suspicion about what the issue could be: the ADD_ADDR might have
been received after the switch to the 'fully-established' state. The
issue was not easy to reproduce. The packet capture shown that the
ADD_ADDR can indeed be sent with a delay, and the client would not try
to establish subflows to it as expected.

A simple fix is not to mark the endpoints as 'used' in the C-flag case,
when looking at creating subflows to the remote initial IP address and
port. In this case, there is no need to try.

Note: newly added fullmesh endpoints will still continue to be used as
expected, thanks to the conditions behind mptcp_pm_add_addr_c_flag_case.

Fixes: 4b1ff850e0c1 ("mptcp: pm: in-kernel: usable client side with C-flag")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251020-net-mptcp-c-flag-late-add-addr-v1-1-8207030cb0e8@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
[ applied to pm_netlink.c instead of pm_kernel.c ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ I took the version from Sasha from v6.1, and fixed an additional
  conflict in pm_netlink.c, because commit a88c9e496937 ("mptcp: do not
  block subflows creation on errors") is not in this version and changed
  the code around: check_work_pending() is now called directly, followed
  by a return instead of a goto. ]
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
---
 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index df46ca14ce23..e94b78a8b0ef 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -532,6 +532,12 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 		check_work_pending(msk);
 	}
 
+	/* No need to try establishing subflows to remote id0 if not allowed */
+	if (mptcp_pm_add_addr_c_flag_case(msk)) {
+		check_work_pending(msk);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	/* check if should create a new subflow */
 	if (msk->pm.local_addr_used < local_addr_max &&
 	    msk->pm.subflows < subflows_max &&
-- 
2.51.0


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-13 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-26 14:33 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: C-flag: handle late ADD_ADDR" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
2025-11-13 15:22 ` Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) [this message]
2025-11-17 14:15   ` [PATCH 5.15.y] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: C-flag: handle late ADD_ADDR Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251113152256.3075806-2-matttbe@kernel.org \
    --to=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=geliang@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.