From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com,mhocko@suse.com,mhocko@kernel.org,glider@google.com,elver@google.com,bhe@redhat.com,urezki@gmail.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-vmalloc-support-non-blocking-gfp-flags-in-alloc_vmap_area.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 17:31:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251117013121.80B13C4CEF5@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/vmalloc: support non-blocking GFP flags in alloc_vmap_area()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-vmalloc-support-non-blocking-gfp-flags-in-alloc_vmap_area.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Subject: mm/vmalloc: support non-blocking GFP flags in alloc_vmap_area()
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 14:20:28 +0200
alloc_vmap_area() currently assumes that sleeping is allowed during
allocation. This is not true for callers which pass non-blocking GFP
flags, such as GFP_ATOMIC or GFP_NOWAIT.
This patch adds logic to detect whether the given gfp_mask permits
blocking. It avoids invoking might_sleep() or falling back to reclaim
path if blocking is not allowed.
This makes alloc_vmap_area() safer for use in non-sleeping contexts, where
previously it could hit unexpected sleeps, trigger warnings.
It is a preparation and adjustment step to later allow both GFP_ATOMIC and
GFP_NOWAIT allocations in this series.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251007122035.56347-4-urezki@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c~mm-vmalloc-support-non-blocking-gfp-flags-in-alloc_vmap_area
+++ a/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2017,6 +2017,7 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area
unsigned long freed;
unsigned long addr;
unsigned int vn_id;
+ bool allow_block;
int purged = 0;
int ret;
@@ -2028,7 +2029,8 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area
/* Only reclaim behaviour flags are relevant. */
gfp_mask = gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK;
- might_sleep();
+ allow_block = gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask);
+ might_sleep_if(allow_block);
/*
* If a VA is obtained from a global heap(if it fails here)
@@ -2062,7 +2064,8 @@ retry:
* This is not a fast path. Check if yielding is needed. This
* is the only reschedule point in the vmalloc() path.
*/
- cond_resched();
+ if (allow_block)
+ cond_resched();
}
trace_alloc_vmap_area(addr, size, align, vstart, vend, IS_ERR_VALUE(addr));
@@ -2071,8 +2074,16 @@ retry:
* If an allocation fails, the error value is
* returned. Therefore trigger the overflow path.
*/
- if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
- goto overflow;
+ if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr)) {
+ if (allow_block)
+ goto overflow;
+
+ /*
+ * We can not trigger any reclaim logic because
+ * sleeping is not allowed, thus fail an allocation.
+ */
+ goto out_free_va;
+ }
va->va_start = addr;
va->va_end = addr + size;
@@ -2122,6 +2133,7 @@ overflow:
pr_warn("vmalloc_node_range for size %lu failed: Address range restricted to %#lx - %#lx\n",
size, vstart, vend);
+out_free_va:
kmem_cache_free(vmap_area_cachep, va);
return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from urezki@gmail.com are
reply other threads:[~2025-11-17 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251117013121.80B13C4CEF5@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.