From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: <peng8420.li@gmail.com>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <david@redhat.com>,
<osalvador@suse.de>, <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
<peterx@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<dan.j.williams@intel.com>, peng8420.li <peng8420.li@gmail.com>,
<oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/gup: fix handling of zero page in follow_page_pte()
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 21:48:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202511172111.32f89804-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251112072424.125514-1-peng8420.li@gmail.com>
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed "BUG:Bad_page_state_in_process" on:
commit: 4e691413bed009d7bd6198eb8fcebd4559a9e017 ("[PATCH] mm/gup: fix handling of zero page in follow_page_pte()")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/peng8420-li-gmail-com/mm-gup-fix-handling-of-zero-page-in-follow_page_pte/20251112-152851
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251112072424.125514-1-peng8420.li@gmail.com/
patch subject: [PATCH] mm/gup: fix handling of zero page in follow_page_pte()
in testcase: trinity
version:
with following parameters:
runtime: 300s
group: group-04
nr_groups: 5
config: x86_64-randconfig-001-20251114
compiler: clang-20
test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 32G
(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202511172111.32f89804-lkp@intel.com
[ 271.087528][ T5904] BUG: Bad page state in process trinity-c1 pfn:05d00
[ 271.088206][ T5904] page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x5d00
[ 271.088949][ T5904] flags: 0x2000000000002000(reserved|zone=1)
[ 271.089455][ T5904] raw: 2000000000002000 ffffea0000174008 ffffea0000174008 0000000000000000
[ 271.090260][ T5904] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
[ 271.090973][ T5904] page dumped because: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag(s) set
[ 271.091567][ T5904] Modules linked in: uvesafb input_leds pcspkr
[ 271.092115][ T5904] CPU: 0 UID: 16384 PID: 5904 Comm: trinity-c1 Tainted: G T 6.18.0-rc5-00409-g4e691413bed0 #1 PREEMPT(none)
[ 271.093592][ T5904] Tainted: [T]=RANDSTRUCT
[ 271.094176][ T5904] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
[ 271.095412][ T5904] Call Trace:
[ 271.095916][ T5904] <TASK>
[ 271.096360][ T5904] __dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:95)
[ 271.096928][ T5904] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)
[ 271.097534][ T5904] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:130)
[ 271.098105][ T5904] bad_page (mm/page_alloc.c:?)
[ 271.098668][ T5904] __free_frozen_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:?)
[ 271.099331][ T5904] free_frozen_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:2987)
[ 271.099969][ T5904] __folio_put (mm/swap.c:?)
[ 271.100495][ T5904] page_cache_pipe_buf_release (fs/splice.c:112)
[ 271.100975][ T5904] __se_sys_vmsplice (include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h:? fs/splice.c:261 fs/splice.c:1475 fs/splice.c:1555 fs/splice.c:1610 fs/splice.c:1580)
[ 271.101425][ T5904] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:104 include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:160 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:202)
[ 271.101869][ T5904] ? do_setitimer (include/linux/spinlock.h:?)
[ 271.102283][ T5904] ? trace_preempt_on (kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c:122)
[ 271.102730][ T5904] __x64_sys_vmsplice (fs/splice.c:1580)
[ 271.103151][ T5904] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
[ 271.103653][ T5904] x64_sys_call (kbuild/obj/consumer/x86_64-randconfig-001-20251114/./arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:470)
[ 271.104064][ T5904] do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:?)
[ 271.104467][ T5904] ? irqentry_exit (kernel/entry/common.c:224)
[ 271.104869][ T5904] ? exc_page_fault (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:?)
[ 271.105286][ T5904] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
[ 271.105781][ T5904] RIP: 0033:0x463519
[ 271.106141][ T5904] Code: 00 f3 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 db 59 00 00 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
All code
========
0: 00 f3 add %dh,%bl
2: c3 ret
3: 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 cs nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
a: 00 00 00
d: 0f 1f 40 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
11: 48 89 f8 mov %rdi,%rax
14: 48 89 f7 mov %rsi,%rdi
17: 48 89 d6 mov %rdx,%rsi
1a: 48 89 ca mov %rcx,%rdx
1d: 4d 89 c2 mov %r8,%r10
20: 4d 89 c8 mov %r9,%r8
23: 4c 8b 4c 24 08 mov 0x8(%rsp),%r9
28: 0f 05 syscall
2a:* 48 3d 01 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff001,%rax <-- trapping instruction
30: 0f 83 db 59 00 00 jae 0x5a11
36: c3 ret
37: 66 data16
38: 2e cs
39: 0f .byte 0xf
3a: 1f (bad)
3b: 84 00 test %al,(%rax)
3d: 00 00 add %al,(%rax)
...
Code starting with the faulting instruction
===========================================
0: 48 3d 01 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff001,%rax
6: 0f 83 db 59 00 00 jae 0x59e7
c: c3 ret
d: 66 data16
e: 2e cs
f: 0f .byte 0xf
10: 1f (bad)
11: 84 00 test %al,(%rax)
13: 00 00 add %al,(%rax)
...
[ 271.107601][ T5904] RSP: 002b:00007ffffa2365e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000116
[ 271.108301][ T5904] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000116 RCX: 0000000000463519
[ 271.108967][ T5904] RDX: 00000000000000d4 RSI: 000000002d4190c0 RDI: 0000000000000126
[ 271.109624][ T5904] RBP: 00007f2836c7b000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffffffffffffb
[ 271.110286][ T5904] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
[ 271.110942][ T5904] R13: 00007f2836c7b058 R14: 000000002d15b850 R15: 00007f2836c7b000
[ 271.111621][ T5904] </TASK>
[ 271.111949][ T5904] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251117/202511172111.32f89804-lkp@intel.com
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-17 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-12 7:24 [PATCH] mm/gup: fix handling of zero page in follow_page_pte() peng8420.li
2025-11-12 8:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-17 13:48 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202511172111.32f89804-lkp@intel.com \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peng8420.li@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.