All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
	Chris Li <sparse@chrisli.org>,
	linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: move some code out of xfs_iget_recycle
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 06:59:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251118055929.GC22733@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251114170402.GJ196370@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 09:04:02AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> I wonder, does sparse get confused by rcu_read_lock having been taken by
> the caller but unlocked here?

Probably.  Plus the conditional trylock.  Note that the more complex
clang context tracking also didn't like it.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-18  5:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-14  5:52 make xfs sparse-warning free Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  5:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] lockref: add a __cond_lock annotation for lockref_put_or_lock Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 18:18   ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-18  5:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  5:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: move some code out of xfs_iget_recycle Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 17:04   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-14 17:28     ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-18  5:59     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-11-14  5:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: work around sparse context tracking in xfs_qm_dquot_isolate Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 17:06   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-18  6:00     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 17:56 ` make xfs sparse-warning free Linus Torvalds
2025-11-18  5:57   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251118055929.GC22733@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.