From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] nvme-pci: Use size_t for length fields to handle larger sizes
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 11:10:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251119101048.GA26266@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251119095516.GA13783@unreal>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 11:55:16AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> So what is the resolution? Should I drop this patch or not?
I think it should be dropped. I don't think having to use one 96-bit
structure per 4GB worth of memory should be a deal breaker.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-19 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 19:22 [PATCH v2 0/2] block: Generalize physical entry definition Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-17 19:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] nvme-pci: Use size_t for length fields to handle larger sizes Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-17 19:35 ` Keith Busch
2025-11-17 20:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-18 5:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-18 23:10 ` Keith Busch
2025-11-18 5:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-19 9:55 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-19 10:10 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-11-19 11:06 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-19 14:44 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-19 13:36 ` David Laight
2025-11-19 13:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-19 14:13 ` David Laight
2025-11-17 19:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] types: move phys_vec definition to common header Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251119101048.GA26266@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.