From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: "André Draszik" <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@google.com>,
Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
kernel-team@android.com,
Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@disroot.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: sec: drop now unused struct sec_pmic_dev::irq_data
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 10:35:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251120103553.GZ1949330@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251114-s5m-alarm-v1-3-c9b3bebae65f@linaro.org>
On Fri, 14 Nov 2025, André Draszik wrote:
> This was used only to allow the s5m RTC driver to deal with the alarm
> IRQ. That driver now uses a different approach to acquire that IRQ, and
> ::irq_data doesn't need to be kept around anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/sec-common.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/mfd/sec-core.h | 2 +-
> drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c | 10 ++--------
> include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 1 -
> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-common.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-common.c
> index 77370db52a7ba81234136b29f85892f4b197f429..794c4e5398e7dd1a816aff9a6559a6c19fec75a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-common.c
> @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ sec_pmic_parse_dt_pdata(struct device *dev)
> int sec_pmic_probe(struct device *dev, int device_type, unsigned int irq,
> struct regmap *regmap, struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
> struct sec_platform_data *pdata;
> const struct mfd_cell *sec_devs;
> struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic;
> @@ -187,7 +188,7 @@ int sec_pmic_probe(struct device *dev, int device_type, unsigned int irq,
>
> sec_pmic->pdata = pdata;
>
> - ret = sec_irq_init(sec_pmic);
> + ret = sec_irq_init(sec_pmic, &irq_data);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -240,7 +241,7 @@ int sec_pmic_probe(struct device *dev, int device_type, unsigned int irq,
> sec_pmic->device_type);
> }
> ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic->dev, -1, sec_devs, num_sec_devs,
> - NULL, 0, regmap_irq_get_domain(sec_pmic->irq_data));
> + NULL, 0, regmap_irq_get_domain(irq_data));
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.h b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.h
> index 92c7558ab8b0de44a52e028eeb7998e38358cb4c..c639180ea686f4308af3f872cb1d2209d201b2e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@ int sec_pmic_probe(struct device *dev, int device_type, unsigned int irq,
> struct regmap *regmap, struct i2c_client *client);
> void sec_pmic_shutdown(struct device *dev);
>
> -int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic);
> +int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic, struct regmap_irq_chip_data **irq_data);
>
> #endif /* __SEC_CORE_INT_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
> index c5c80b1ba104e6c5a55b442d2f10a8554201a961..05d4cc350a351d994e00ba08f5ce966d0d5c6a0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip s5m8767_irq_chip = {
> .ack_base = S5M8767_REG_INT1,
> };
>
> -int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic)
> +int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic, struct regmap_irq_chip_data **irq_data)
Instead of passing around pointers to pointers, why not return irq_data
or NULL?
> {
> const struct regmap_irq_chip *sec_irq_chip;
> int ret;
> @@ -302,17 +302,11 @@ int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic)
>
> ret = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(sec_pmic->dev, sec_pmic->regmap_pmic,
> sec_pmic->irq, IRQF_ONESHOT,
> - 0, sec_irq_chip, &sec_pmic->irq_data);
> + 0, sec_irq_chip, irq_data);
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(sec_pmic->dev, ret,
> "Failed to add %s IRQ chip\n",
> sec_irq_chip->name);
>
> - /*
> - * The rtc-s5m driver requests S2MPS14_IRQ_RTCA0 also for S2MPS11
> - * so the interrupt number must be consistent.
> - */
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(((enum s2mps14_irq)S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA0) != S2MPS14_IRQ_RTCA0);
> -
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h b/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h
> index d785e101fe795a5d8f9cccf4ccc4232437e89416..c7c3c8cd8d5f99ef0cc3188e1c3b49031f4750f2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h
> @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ struct sec_pmic_dev {
>
> int device_type;
> int irq;
> - struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
> };
>
> struct sec_platform_data {
>
> --
> 2.52.0.rc1.455.g30608eb744-goog
>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-14 11:47 [PATCH 0/3] Samsung mfd/rtc driver alarm IRQ simplification André Draszik
2025-11-14 11:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd: sec: add rtc alarm IRQ as platform device resource André Draszik
2025-11-14 11:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] rtc: s5m: query platform device IRQ resource for alarm IRQ André Draszik
2025-11-14 15:58 ` Alexandre Belloni
2025-11-14 11:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] mfd: sec: drop now unused struct sec_pmic_dev::irq_data André Draszik
2025-11-20 10:35 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2025-11-20 14:38 ` André Draszik
2025-11-20 10:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] Samsung mfd/rtc driver alarm IRQ simplification Lee Jones
2025-11-20 10:32 ` André Draszik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251120103553.GZ1949330@google.com \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andre.draszik@linaro.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jyescas@google.com \
--cc=kauschluss@disroot.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
--cc=willmcvicker@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.