From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] locking/ww_mutex, dma-buf/dma-resv: Improve detection of unheld locks
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 12:03:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251120110341.2425-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> (raw)
WW mutexes and dma-resv objects, which embed them, typically have a
number of locks belocking to the same lock class. However
code using them typically want to verify the locking on
object granularity, not lock-class granularity.
This series add ww_mutex functions to facilitate that,
(patch 1) and utilizes these functions in the dma-resv lock
checks.
Thomas Hellström (2):
kernel/locking/ww_mutex: Add per-lock lock-check helpers
dma-buf/dma-resv: Improve the dma-resv lockdep checks
include/linux/dma-resv.h | 7 +++++--
include/linux/ww_mutex.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
kernel/locking/mutex.c | 10 ++++++++++
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.51.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 11:03 Thomas Hellström [this message]
2025-11-20 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] kernel/locking/ww_mutex: Add per-lock lock-check helpers Thomas Hellström
2025-11-20 11:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-20 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] dma-buf/dma-resv: Improve the dma-resv lockdep checks Thomas Hellström
2025-11-20 13:22 ` Christian König
2025-11-20 12:59 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for locking/ww_mutex, dma-buf/dma-resv: Improve detection of unheld locks Patchwork
2025-11-20 13:01 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-20 13:19 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-11-20 13:47 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-20 16:23 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251120110341.2425-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.