From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB6E30594E for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763630693; cv=none; b=m4nVQZ5wMknjtoOA53pYc7Rc8kSNs/du5/AqgmW1PBjcnbh+81buw0e49HWKsI7Au1RzyGWzN+fyBQ2OpqJwp+QEAOPLqH6H7yhGXFxabFBpl/utTuT8oYLJAU78/QrKliF6Ft/+5V/2NFqanmNdZntY8B0TVd3wmEV0R8CNve8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763630693; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ch4VQ0nXP3uSFLZekUnH52pH15kDGwnS0g+nlZgkFfU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FChyCs4dV2BsUJbMjVFgmt9EBG7cWo7qQnivDjhbFlSx/GyOkj2lKZYPESRB0VDFzNtPsS+y6+EJ3OGEIZ/TP7u9JQdKzyhZVlCYu6xuLzpb6gY0QE7Bafcrg2A7Mhb74EnfA2IQ7mJ75o7SH7WgXs2ZqihAII7VFQcX+e9tsYY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=nOx6UYDu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="nOx6UYDu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1763630691; x=1795166691; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Ch4VQ0nXP3uSFLZekUnH52pH15kDGwnS0g+nlZgkFfU=; b=nOx6UYDuKExus/wg5XzX/qdWCPWB1nix2rpps4MpDvl9sc3ZJNexJizq JAQut33KTC69udpJ/hKuWBoGmjOVHwyngy6kMUn89Hr87pkARNjgnyDTz mvLff45TiEsNLvCsSSTozM0cTgoKMTwwItzE0IKa6CbPGUBjWNLm2/j5g PgttfI8O6YEPLX2Bu7MOHFr6JoTXVjwaDvTbk3nrqiNGDhwaUp1DN4zQE r8VOckjGKEn93JHWA+z/yE98983eUD2EjqBUAKmULC6kck7XIJDfPmCsD 2kycwue45qWGTzE8dO/zXjxMn8bT1wAr7HC/baYTwGPK5ljEJjwfvPAU2 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: iHNFIAJDQkO6LhRaB/sjSQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8rJnwJxnQralsoZ+2S13BA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11618"; a="65572006" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,317,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="65572006" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Nov 2025 01:24:50 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: j4Fsqz4VQCagWRd1BFkHQA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: y9W4T1ZFQHqVDj74ZvQMGA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,317,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="221957865" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO adf6d29aa8d9) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Nov 2025 01:24:49 -0800 Received: from kbuild by adf6d29aa8d9 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vM0uD-0003oJ-2y; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:24:45 +0000 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 17:23:57 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Steven Rostedt Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [POC][RFC][PATCH 1/3] tracing: Add perf events Message-ID: <202511201604.uyinorJA-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251118003531.644484343@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251118003531.644484343@kernel.org> Hi Steven, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on trace/for-next] [also build test ERROR on next-20251119] [cannot apply to linus/master v6.18-rc6] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Steven-Rostedt/tracing-Add-perf-events/20251118-083721 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251118003531.644484343%40kernel.org patch subject: [POC][RFC][PATCH 1/3] tracing: Add perf events config: arc-randconfig-6001-20251120 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251120/202511201604.uyinorJA-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arc-linux-gcc (GCC) 10.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251120/202511201604.uyinorJA-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511201604.uyinorJA-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/trace/trace_output.c: In function 'trace_perf_event_print': >> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1681:18: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct perf_event_entry' 1681 | for (val = field->values; val < end; val++) { | ^~ kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1682:19: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct perf_event_entry' 1682 | if (val != field->values) | ^~ >> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1684:11: error: implicit declaration of function 'PERF_TRACE_VALUE' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 1684 | value = PERF_TRACE_VALUE(*val); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1685:11: error: implicit declaration of function 'PERF_TRACE_TYPE' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 1685 | switch (PERF_TRACE_TYPE(*val)) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1686:8: error: 'PERF_TRACE_CYCLES' undeclared (first use in this function) 1686 | case PERF_TRACE_CYCLES: | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1686:8: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in >> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1689:8: error: 'PERF_TRACE_CACHE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE'? 1689 | case PERF_TRACE_CACHE: | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE kernel/trace/trace_output.c: In function 'trace_perf_event_raw': kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1714:18: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct perf_event_entry' 1714 | for (val = field->values; val < end; val++) { | ^~ kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1715:19: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct perf_event_entry' 1715 | if (val != field->values) | ^~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +1681 kernel/trace/trace_output.c 1665 1666 static enum print_line_t 1667 trace_perf_event_print(struct trace_iterator *iter, int flags, 1668 struct trace_event *event) 1669 { 1670 struct trace_entry *entry = iter->ent; 1671 struct trace_seq *s = &iter->seq; 1672 struct perf_event_entry *field; 1673 u64 value; 1674 u64 *val; 1675 u64 *end; 1676 1677 end = (u64 *)((long)iter->ent + iter->ent_size); 1678 1679 trace_assign_type(field, entry); 1680 > 1681 for (val = field->values; val < end; val++) { 1682 if (val != field->values) 1683 trace_seq_putc(s, ' '); > 1684 value = PERF_TRACE_VALUE(*val); > 1685 switch (PERF_TRACE_TYPE(*val)) { > 1686 case PERF_TRACE_CYCLES: 1687 trace_seq_printf(s, "cpu_cycles: %lld", value); 1688 break; > 1689 case PERF_TRACE_CACHE: 1690 trace_seq_printf(s, "cache_misses: %lld", value); 1691 break; 1692 default: 1693 trace_seq_printf(s, "unkown(%d): %lld", 1694 (int)PERF_TRACE_TYPE(*val), value); 1695 } 1696 } 1697 trace_seq_putc(s, '\n'); 1698 return trace_handle_return(s); 1699 } 1700 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki