From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/8] uprobe/x86: Add support to emulate mov reg,reg instructions
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 19:50:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202511201932.iuDaTkGE-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251117124057.687384-4-jolsa@kernel.org>
Hi Jiri,
[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/x86/core]
[also build test ERROR on bpf-next/net bpf-next/master bpf/master linus/master v6.18-rc6 next-20251119]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jiri-Olsa/uprobe-x86-Introduce-struct-arch_uprobe_xol-object/20251117-205911
base: tip/x86/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117124057.687384-4-jolsa%40kernel.org
patch subject: [RFC PATCH 3/8] uprobe/x86: Add support to emulate mov reg,reg instructions
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-6003-20251120 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251120/202511201932.iuDaTkGE-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251120/202511201932.iuDaTkGE-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511201932.iuDaTkGE-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c:1600:39: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 2, have 1
1600 | off_src = insn_get_modrm_reg_off(insn);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
arch/x86/include/asm/insn-eval.h:23:5: note: 'insn_get_modrm_reg_off' declared here
23 | int insn_get_modrm_reg_off(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs);
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c:1603:38: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 2, have 1
1603 | off_dst = insn_get_modrm_rm_off(insn);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
arch/x86/include/asm/insn-eval.h:22:5: note: 'insn_get_modrm_rm_off' declared here
22 | int insn_get_modrm_rm_off(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs);
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2 errors generated.
vim +1600 arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
1580
1581 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
1582 /* Returns -ENOSYS if mov_xol_ops doesn't handle this insn */
1583 static int mov_setup_xol_ops(struct arch_uprobe_xol *xol, struct insn *insn)
1584 {
1585 u8 opc1 = OPCODE1(insn);
1586 int off_src, off_dst;
1587
1588 /* validate opcode */
1589 if (opc1 != 0x89)
1590 return -ENOSYS;
1591 if (insn->rex_prefix.nbytes != 1 ||
1592 insn->rex_prefix.bytes[0] != 0x48)
1593 return -ENOSYS;
1594
1595 /* only register operands */
1596 if (X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) != 3)
1597 return -ENOSYS;
1598
1599 /* get registers offset */
> 1600 off_src = insn_get_modrm_reg_off(insn);
1601 if (off_src < 0)
1602 return off_src;
1603 off_dst = insn_get_modrm_rm_off(insn);
1604 if (off_dst < 0)
1605 return off_dst;
1606
1607 xol->mov.src = off_src;
1608 xol->mov.dst = off_dst;
1609 xol->mov.ilen = insn->length;
1610 xol->ops = &mov_xol_ops;
1611 return 0;
1612 }
1613 #else
1614 static int mov_setup_xol_ops(struct arch_uprobe_xol *xol, struct insn *insn)
1615 {
1616 return -ENOSYS;
1617 }
1618 #endif
1619
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 12:40 [RFC PATCH 0/8] uprobe/x86: Add support to optimize prologue Jiri Olsa
2025-11-17 12:40 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] uprobe/x86: Introduce struct arch_uprobe_xol object Jiri Olsa
2025-11-17 12:40 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] uprobe/x86: Use struct arch_uprobe_xol in emulate callback Jiri Olsa
2025-11-17 12:40 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] uprobe/x86: Add support to emulate mov reg,reg instructions Jiri Olsa
2025-11-20 11:50 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-11-17 12:40 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] uprobe/x86: Add support to emulate sub imm,reg instructions Jiri Olsa
2025-11-17 12:40 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] uprobe/x86: Add support to optimize on top of emulated instructions Jiri Olsa
2025-11-24 18:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-11-26 7:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-11-17 12:40 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] selftests/bpf: Add test for mov and sub emulation Jiri Olsa
2025-11-17 12:40 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] selftests/bpf: Add test for uprobe prologue optimization Jiri Olsa
2025-11-17 12:40 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add race test for uprobe proglog optimization Jiri Olsa
2025-11-24 18:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] uprobe/x86: Add support to optimize prologue Oleg Nesterov
2025-12-08 6:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-12-08 10:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-12-07 22:23 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202511201932.iuDaTkGE-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.