From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42E1534EF01; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 13:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763733192; cv=none; b=pXiHwk5xZ/o/8iR4AGC/K2U3dTxA1/6hmEKyE8vAuRA1g3Lz9JwiFOe85/MdFBus2or6iHwcJnNY4WBDya0Z5f+GAZee1BT08mRHfvGNj1eLFuuKVoBIltou3ex3jG5lS4AgJyPOSUSZRRDy9QqrOuTzqlonXRUmhKK23jRAYFk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763733192; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jEIve6cdre4puF4LpSoKnFrFSJ9YzfnWdH7WmBC1REs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=P2GTGCixQqqGD76iIY3Gs2TEWYlICFujEspifP+mHb0uE9FrDtP8PKCaPE1d4MI2wBT+43Vm98t0QoA6+4Rt3aenO/Hk1ySDu2IGtNAfIGkcGn/iV9cMkDHo+dQAxOccQVWypho7BB+7unp/Yx+/1UdP5zF5N5rrmsRoS7F2R74= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=v2QssrJW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="v2QssrJW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD3E3C4CEFB; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 13:53:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1763733192; bh=jEIve6cdre4puF4LpSoKnFrFSJ9YzfnWdH7WmBC1REs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=v2QssrJWQBNywTSzw7slRj30krQDMoHV2OiDwDiItVy8esRt76Xp8CPp01RDOoJ3p tQiR2vGtU8APynYbm1NV0DQQ0KsfgBQIGk2gRCJCReRlSeLrXUtPdMUdPqqBexJmK8 r6DfCLs5/KZpRbhI0TZsO1o6m5PcVgMDKXf/v5RE= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Peter Zijlstra , Andy Shevchenko , Nathan Chancellor , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.6 382/529] compiler_types: Move unused static inline functions warning to W=2 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 14:11:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20251121130244.615775389@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.52.0 In-Reply-To: <20251121130230.985163914@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20251121130230.985163914@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Peter Zijlstra [ Upstream commit 9818af18db4bfefd320d0fef41390a616365e6f7 ] Per Nathan, clang catches unused "static inline" functions in C files since commit 6863f5643dd7 ("kbuild: allow Clang to find unused static inline functions for W=1 build"). Linus said: > So I entirely ignore W=1 issues, because I think so many of the extra > warnings are bogus. > > But if this one in particular is causing more problems than most - > some teams do seem to use W=1 as part of their test builds - it's fine > to send me a patch that just moves bad warnings to W=2. > > And if anybody uses W=2 for their test builds, that's THEIR problem.. Here is the change to bump the warning from W=1 to W=2. Fixes: 6863f5643dd7 ("kbuild: allow Clang to find unused static inline functions for W=1 build") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106105000.2103276-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com [nathan: Adjust comment as well] Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- include/linux/compiler_types.h | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h index 02f616dfb15f4..5c8aca9c34566 100644 --- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h @@ -229,10 +229,9 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data { /* * GCC does not warn about unused static inline functions for -Wunused-function. * Suppress the warning in clang as well by using __maybe_unused, but enable it - * for W=1 build. This will allow clang to find unused functions. Remove the - * __inline_maybe_unused entirely after fixing most of -Wunused-function warnings. + * for W=2 build. This will allow clang to find unused functions. */ -#ifdef KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN1 +#ifdef KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN2 #define __inline_maybe_unused #else #define __inline_maybe_unused __maybe_unused -- 2.51.0