From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiefeng <jiefeng.z.zhang@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, edumazet@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, irusskikh@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: atlantic: fix fragment overflow handling in RX path
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 18:01:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251121180152.562f3361@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADEc0q53dNkcfk+0ZKMRrqX99OfB-KonrZ8eO2r1EC-KLkfXgA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 22 Nov 2025 09:36:29 +0800 Jiefeng wrote:
> > Thank you for the feedback! I've updated the patch to v2 based on your
> > suggestion to skip extracting the zeroth fragment when frag_cnt ==
> > MAX_SKB_FRAGS.
> > This approach is simpler and aligns with your comment that extracting the
> > zeroth fragment is just a performance optimization, not necessary for
> > correctness.
> >
> > I've also included the stack trace from production (without timestamps) in
> > the commit message:
> >
> > The fix adds a check to skip extracting the zeroth fragment when
> > frag_cnt == MAX_SKB_FRAGS, preventing the fragment overflow.
> >
> > Please review the v2 patch.
>
> Hi, I've reconsidered the two approaches and I
> think fixing the existing check (assuming there will be an extra frag if
> buff->len > AQ_CFG_RX_HDR_SIZE) makes more sense. This approach:
>
> 1. Prevents the overflow earlier in the code path
> 2. Ensures data completeness (all fragments are accounted for)
> 3. Avoids potential data loss from skipping the zeroth fragment
>
> If you agree, I'll submit a v3 patch based on this approach. The fix
> will modify the existing check to include the potential zeroth
> fragment in the fragment count calculation.
>
> Please let me know if this approach is acceptable.
Right, v2 is not correct. You'd need to calculate hdr_len earlier,
already taking into account whether there is space for the zeroth
frag. And if not - you can just allocate napi_alloc_skb() with enough
space, and copy the full buf. This would avoid the data loss.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-22 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-18 7:04 [PATCH net] net: atlantic: fix fragment overflow handling in RX path jiefeng.z.zhang
2025-11-18 20:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-19 8:38 ` Jiefeng
2025-11-20 3:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-20 13:06 ` Jiefeng
2025-11-22 1:36 ` Jiefeng
2025-11-22 2:01 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-11-24 14:08 ` Jiefeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251121180152.562f3361@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=irusskikh@marvell.com \
--cc=jiefeng.z.zhang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.