From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/crypto: blake2b: Limit frame size workaround to GCC < 12.2 on i386
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 12:04:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251122200402.GD5803@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251122105530.441350-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 11:55:31AM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> The GCC bug only occurred on i386 and has been resolved since GCC 12.2.
> Limit the frame size workaround to GCC < 12.2 on i386.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
> ---
> lib/crypto/Makefile | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/crypto/Makefile b/lib/crypto/Makefile
> index b5346cebbb55..5ee36a231484 100644
> --- a/lib/crypto/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/crypto/Makefile
> @@ -33,7 +33,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_LIB_GF128MUL) += gf128mul.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_LIB_BLAKE2B) += libblake2b.o
> libblake2b-y := blake2b.o
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_32),y)
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC)_$(call gcc-min-version, 120200),y_)
> CFLAGS_blake2b.o := -Wframe-larger-than=4096 # https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105930
> +endif # CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC
> +endif # CONFIG_X86_32
How about we do it without the nested ifeq?
ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_32)$(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC)_$(call gcc-min-version, 120200),yy_)
CFLAGS_blake2b.o := -Wframe-larger-than=4096 # https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105930
endif
Also, according to the bugreport this was a regression in gcc 12. With
it having been fixed in 12.2, i.e. within the same gcc release series,
is this workaround still worth carrying at all?
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-22 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-22 10:55 [PATCH] lib/crypto: blake2b: Limit frame size workaround to GCC < 12.2 on i386 Thorsten Blum
2025-11-22 20:04 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-11-22 23:23 ` Thorsten Blum
2025-11-23 1:55 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-23 9:28 ` david laight
2025-11-23 17:00 ` Thorsten Blum
2025-11-23 18:58 ` david laight
2025-11-23 20:26 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-24 9:08 ` david laight
2025-11-24 17:14 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2025-11-24 22:40 ` Eric Biggers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-23 0:19 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251122200402.GD5803@quark \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.