All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Guo <dongtai.guo@linux.dev>
To: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	George Guo <guodongtai@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] LoongArch: Add 128-bit atomic cmpxchg support (v3)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 17:40:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251126174016.000067f4@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEyhmHTJU-OUZFA5Sdiv+mBwQpfq5CZp5kN9HVKRqbQzqRS66Q@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=GB18030, Size: 3858 bytes --]

On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 13:23:57 +0800
Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 10:066§2AM George Guo <dongtai.guo@linux.dev>
> wrote:
> >
> > This patch series adds 128-bit atomic compare-and-exchange support
> > for LoongArch architecture, which fixes BPF scheduler test failures
> > caused by missing 128-bit atomics support.
> >
> > The series consists of two patches:
> >
> > 1. "LoongArch: Add 128-bit atomic cmpxchg support"
> >    - Implements 128-bit atomic compare-and-exchange using
> > LoongArch's LL.D/SC.Q instructions
> >    - Fixes BPF scheduler test failures (scx_central scx_qmap) where
> >      kmalloc_nolock_noprof returns NULL due to missing 128-bit
> > atomics, leading to -ENOMEM errors during scheduler initialization
> >  
> 
> This kmalloc_nolock_noprof() was introduced in v6.18-rc1 and has no
> caller for now.
> Why is this related to the sched_ext failure ?
> 
Hi Hengqi,

When running scx_central, function call chain as below:
central_init->bpf_timer_init->__bpf_async_init->bpf_map_kmalloc_nolock->kmalloc_nolock
->kmalloc_nolock_noprof

The function kmalloc_nolock_noprof returns NULL due to the following
condition:

if (!(s->flags & __CMPXCHG_DOUBLE) && !kmem_cache_debug(s))
        /*
         * kmalloc_nolock() is not supported on architectures that
         * don't implement cmpxchg16b, but debug caches don't use
         * per-cpu slab and per-cpu partial slabs. They rely on
         * kmem_cache_node->list_lock, so kmalloc_nolock() can
         * attempt to allocate from debug caches by
         * spin_trylock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, ...)
         */
        return NULL;

The NULL return occurs because kmalloc_nolock is not supported on
Loongarch, which don't implement cmpxchg16b. So I am giving the patch.

Also I tried with debug caches(CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y), it works,
but not a good idea. 

> > 2. "LoongArch: Enable 128-bit atomics cmpxchg support"
> >    - Adds select HAVE_CMPXCHG_DOUBLE and select
> > HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE in Kconfig to enable 128-bit atomic
> > cmpxchg support
> >
> > The issue was identified through BPF scheduler test failures where
> > scx_central and scx_qmap schedulers would fail to initialize.
> > Testing was performed using the scx_qmap scheduler from
> > tools/sched_ext/, confirming that the patches resolve the
> > initialization failures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: George Guo <dongtai.guo@linux.dev>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - dbar 0 -> __WEAK_LLSC_MB
> > - =ZB" (__ptr[0]) -> "r" (__ptr)
> > - Link to v2:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251124-2-v2-0-b38216e25fd9@linux.dev
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Use a normal ld.d for the high word instead of ll.d to avoid race
> >   condition
> > - Insert a dbar between ll.d and ld.d to prevent reordering
> > - Simply __cmpxchg128_asm("ll.d", "sc.q", ptr, o, n) to
> > __cmpxchg128_asm(ptr, o, n)
> > - Fix address operand constraints after testing different
> > approaches:
> >   * ld.d with "m"
> >   * ll.d with "ZC",
> >   * sc.q with "ZB"(alternative constraints caused issues:
> >    - "r"  caused system hang
> >    - "ZC" caused compiler error:
> >      {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> >      {standard input}:10037: Fatal error: Immediate overflow.
> >      format: u0:0 )
> > - Link to v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251120-2-v1-0-705bdc440550@linux.dev
> >
> > ---
> > George Guo (2):
> >       LoongArch: Add 128-bit atomic cmpxchg support
> >       LoongArch: Enable 128-bit atomics cmpxchg support
> >
> >  arch/loongarch/Kconfig               |  2 ++
> >  arch/loongarch/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 47
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 49
> > insertions(+) ---
> > base-commit: d5ae5ac32615e4af729f0610fdc11ff4f4798aef
> > change-id: 20251120-2-d03862b2cf6d
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > George Guo <dongtai.guo@linux.dev>
> >
> >  


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-26  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-26  2:05 [PATCH v3 0/2] LoongArch: Add 128-bit atomic cmpxchg support (v3) George Guo
2025-11-26  2:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] LoongArch: Add 128-bit atomic cmpxchg support George Guo
2025-11-26  2:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] LoongArch: Enable 128-bit atomics " George Guo
2025-11-26  4:44 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] LoongArch: Add 128-bit atomic cmpxchg support (v3) Huacai Chen
2025-11-26  9:42   ` George Guo
2025-11-26  5:23 ` Hengqi Chen
2025-11-26  9:40   ` George Guo [this message]
2025-11-26 11:05     ` Hengqi Chen
2025-11-27  4:15       ` Hengqi Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251126174016.000067f4@linux.dev \
    --to=dongtai.guo@linux.dev \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=guodongtai@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=hengqi.chen@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.