+ args-fix-documentation-to-reflect-the-correct-numbers.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

The patch titled
     Subject: args: fix documentation to reflect the correct numbers
has been added to the -mm mm-nonmm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     args-fix-documentation-to-reflect-the-correct-numbers.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/args-fix-documentation-to-reflect-the-correct-numbers.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: args: fix documentation to reflect the correct numbers
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 21:10:18 +0100

The macro uses up to 15 arguments.  Reflect this in the top level comment.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251201201018.765475-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Fixes: d51e783c17ba ("lsm: count the LSMs enabled at compile time")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 include/linux/args.h |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/args.h~args-fix-documentation-to-reflect-the-correct-numbers
+++ a/include/linux/args.h
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
 /*
  * How do these macros work?
  *
- * In __COUNT_ARGS() _0 to _12 are just placeholders from the start
+ * In __COUNT_ARGS() _0 to _15 are just placeholders from the start
  * in order to make sure _n is positioned over the correct number
- * from 12 to 0 (depending on X, which is a variadic argument list).
+ * from 15 to 0 (depending on X, which is a variadic argument list).
  * They serve no purpose other than occupying a position. Since each
  * macro parameter must have a distinct identifier, those identifiers
  * are as good as any.
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com are

args-fix-documentation-to-reflect-the-correct-numbers.patch