From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] perf cs-etm: Don't hard code config attribute when configuring the event
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 14:43:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251204144336.GN724103@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <857538e7-cac2-4871-9711-4c434420df8a@linaro.org>
On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 02:08:59PM +0000, James Clark wrote:
[...]
> > > + err = evsel__get_config_val(cs_etm_pmu, evsel, "contextid", &ctxt);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return err;
> > > + err = evsel__get_config_val(cs_etm_pmu, evsel, "contextid1", &ctxt1);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return err;
> > > + err = evsel__get_config_val(cs_etm_pmu, evsel, "contextid2", &ctxt2);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return err;
> >
> > Seems to me, this is not right. The current code checks any context
> > ID setting but it can tolerate if missing "contexid[*]" format.
> >
> > After calling evsel__get_config_val(), if any "contextid[*]" format is
> > missed, it returns error and will diretly bail out. As a result,
> > cs_etm_validate_context_id() will always return error.
> >
>
> Missed by the driver or the user? evsel__get_config_val() only returns an
> error when "contextid" isn't published by the driver, not when the user
> doesn't supply one of those options. The actual user supplied value is in
> the out param, not the return value.
My question is for missing format from user. Thanks for reminding the
error is only for driver's publishing.
> Having said that, this does make it an error if the driver did stop
> publishing one, which might be too inflexible and is a new behavior. I can
> change to it ignore the errors instead.
Yeah, this will likely break nVHE / pKVM cases.
Thanks,
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-04 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-01 16:41 [PATCH 0/7] perf cs-etm/arm-spe: Remove hard coded config fields James Clark
2025-12-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf tools: Track all user changed config bits James Clark
2025-12-02 10:15 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-02 10:40 ` James Clark
2025-12-02 11:21 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-02 12:36 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf tools: apply evsel__set_config_if_unset() to all config fields James Clark
2025-12-02 11:14 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-04 10:55 ` James Clark
2025-12-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf cs-etm: Make a helper to find the Coresight evsel James Clark
2025-12-02 11:24 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf cs-etm: Don't use hard coded config bits when setting up ETMCR James Clark
2025-12-02 11:43 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-02 11:53 ` James Clark
2025-12-04 10:55 ` James Clark
2025-12-04 13:45 ` Mike Leach
2025-12-04 13:48 ` James Clark
2025-12-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf cs-etm: Don't use hard coded config bits when setting up TRCCONFIGR James Clark
2025-12-02 12:01 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf cs-etm: Don't hard code config attribute when configuring the event James Clark
2025-12-02 12:15 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-04 14:08 ` James Clark
2025-12-04 14:43 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2025-12-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf arm-spe: Don't hard code config attribute James Clark
2025-12-02 12:28 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-02 12:42 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-02 12:59 ` James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251204144336.GN724103@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.