From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skolothumtho@nvidia.com,
praan@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc v1 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add ignored bits to fix STE update sequence
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 15:38:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251206193830.GF1219718@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1af0f768-4b3d-47a3-b59b-c56f034b1d1b@linux.alibaba.com>
On Sat, Dec 06, 2025 at 10:19:08PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> Instead of modifying the calculation logic, would it be cleaner to keep
> the original arm_smmu_get_ste_used() semantics intact and simply exclude
> ignored bits from cur_used after obtaining them?
I'm OK with this idea
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-06 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-06 0:51 [PATCH rc v1 0/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix hitless STE update in nesting cases Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06 0:52 ` [PATCH rc v1 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add ignored bits to fix STE update sequence Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06 14:19 ` Shuai Xue
2025-12-06 19:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-12-06 19:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-06 19:45 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06 19:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-07 4:37 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-12-07 16:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-07 19:35 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-12-07 20:11 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06 0:52 ` [PATCH rc v1 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ignore STE MEV when computing the " Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06 0:52 ` [PATCH rc v1 3/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ignore STE EATS " Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06 19:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-06 19:54 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06 0:52 ` [PATCH rc v1 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-test: Add nested s1bypass coverage Nicolin Chen
2025-12-06 12:34 ` Shuai Xue
2025-12-06 19:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-06 19:50 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251206193830.GF1219718@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.