From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Vijayanand Jitta <vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: robin.murphy@arm.com, will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org,
dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com,
konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com, bjorn.andersson@oss.qualcomm.com,
bod@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
charan.kalla@oss.qualcomm.com, prakash.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com,
vikash.garodia@oss.qualcomm.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 14:17:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251209201725.GB1015230-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251204095530.8627-4-vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 03:25:30PM +0530, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
> From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>
> So far our parsing of {iommu,msi}-map properites has always blindly
> asusmed that the output specifiers will always have exactly 1 cell.
> This typically does happen to be the case, but is not actually enforced
> (and the PCI msi-map binding even explicitly states support for 0 or 1
> cells) - as a result we've now ended up with dodgy DTs out in the field
> which depend on this behaviour to map a 1-cell specifier for a 2-cell
> provider, despite that being bogus per the bindings themselves.
>
> Since there is some potential use in being able to map at least single
> input IDs to multi-cell output specifiers (and properly support 0-cell
> outputs as well), add support for properly parsing and using the target
> nodes' #cells values, albeit with the unfortunate complication of still
> having to work around expectations of the old behaviour too.
>
> Since there are multi-cell output specifiers, the callers of of_map_id()
> may need to get the exact cell output value for further processing.
> Added support for that part --charan
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vijayanand Jitta <vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 3 +-
> drivers/of/base.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> include/linux/of.h | 17 ++++---
> 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> index eac62bc441c5..48759cf1d900 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> @@ -45,10 +45,11 @@ static int of_iommu_configure_dev_id(struct device_node *master_np,
> struct device *dev,
> const u32 *id)
> {
> - struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = { .args_count = 1 };
> + struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = {};
> struct of_map_id_arg arg = {
> .target = &iommu_spec.np,
> .id_out = iommu_spec.args,
> + .map_cells = &iommu_spec.args_count,
> };
> int err;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index b8f78a9e6a09..68a7d6ddba66 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -2045,11 +2045,30 @@ int of_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
> return cache_level;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Some DTs have an iommu-map targeting a 2-cell IOMMU node while
> + * specifying only 1 cell. Fortunately they all consist of length == 1
> + * entries with the same target, so check for that pattern.
Can you show what a bad entry looks like here.
> + */
> +static bool of_check_bad_map(const __be32 *map, int len)
> +{
> + __be32 phandle = map[1];
> +
> + if (len % 4)
> + return false;
> + for (int i = 0; i < len; i += 4) {
> + if (map[i + 1] != phandle || map[i + 3] != cpu_to_be32(1))
Why does the IOMMU arg cell have to be 1? The description said 'same
target', but it is just all have an IOMMU cell value of 1?
> + return false;
> + }
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * of_map_id - Translate an ID through a downstream mapping.
> * @np: root complex device node.
> * @id: device ID to map.
> * @map_name: property name of the map to use.
> + * @cells_name: property name of target specifier cells.
> * @map_mask_name: optional property name of the mask to use.
> * @arg: contains the optional params, @target which is a pointer
> * to the target device node and id_out which is a pointer
> @@ -2065,18 +2084,19 @@ int of_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
> *
> * Return: 0 on success or a standard error code on failure.
> */
> -int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> - const char *map_name, const char *map_mask_name,
> - struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
> +int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
> + const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
> + struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
> {
> u32 map_mask, masked_id;
> - int map_len;
> + int map_bytes, map_len, offset = 0;
> + bool bad_map = false;
> const __be32 *map = NULL;
>
> if (!np || !map_name || !arg || (!arg->target && !arg->id_out))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - map = of_get_property(np, map_name, &map_len);
> + map = of_get_property(np, map_name, &map_bytes);
> if (!map) {
> if (arg->target)
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -2085,11 +2105,9 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> return 0;
> }
>
> - if (!map_len || map_len % (4 * sizeof(*map))) {
> - pr_err("%pOF: Error: Bad %s length: %d\n", np,
> - map_name, map_len);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + if (map_bytes % sizeof(*map))
> + goto err_map_len;
> + map_len = map_bytes / sizeof(*map);
>
> /* The default is to select all bits. */
> map_mask = 0xffffffff;
> @@ -2102,27 +2120,62 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> of_property_read_u32(np, map_mask_name, &map_mask);
>
> masked_id = map_mask & id;
> - for ( ; map_len > 0; map_len -= 4 * sizeof(*map), map += 4) {
> + while (offset < map_len) {
> struct device_node *phandle_node;
> - u32 id_base = be32_to_cpup(map + 0);
> - u32 phandle = be32_to_cpup(map + 1);
> - u32 out_base = be32_to_cpup(map + 2);
> - u32 id_len = be32_to_cpup(map + 3);
> + u32 id_base, phandle, cells, id_len, id_off;
> + const __be32 *out_base;
> +
> + if (map_len - offset < 2)
> + goto err_map_len;
>
> + id_base = be32_to_cpup(map + offset);
> if (id_base & ~map_mask) {
> - pr_err("%pOF: Invalid %s translation - %s-mask (0x%x) ignores id-base (0x%x)\n",
> - np, map_name, map_name,
> + pr_err("%pOF: Invalid %s translation - %s (0x%x) ignores id-base (0x%x)\n",
> + np, map_name, map_mask_name,
> map_mask, id_base);
> return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> - if (masked_id < id_base || masked_id >= id_base + id_len)
> - continue;
> -
> + phandle = be32_to_cpup(map + offset + 1);
> phandle_node = of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle);
> if (!phandle_node)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + if (!bad_map && of_property_read_u32(phandle_node, cells_name, &cells)) {
> + pr_err("%pOF: missing %s property\n", phandle_node, cells_name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (map_len - offset < 3 + cells)
> + goto err_map_len;
> +
> + if (offset == 0 && cells == 2) {
> + bad_map = of_check_bad_map(map, map_len);
> + if (bad_map) {
> + pr_warn_once("%pOF: %s mismatches target %s, assuming extra cell of 0\n",
> + np, map_name, cells_name);
> + cells = 1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + out_base = map + offset + 2;
> + offset += 3 + cells;
> +
> + id_len = be32_to_cpup(map + offset - 1);
> + if (id_len > 1 && cells > 1) {
> + /*
> + * With 1 output cell we reasonably assume its value
> + * has a linear relationship to the input; with more,
> + * we'd need help from the provider to know what to do.
> + */
> + pr_err("%pOF: Unsupported %s - cannot handle %d-ID range with %d-cell output specifier\n",
> + np, map_name, id_len, cells);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + id_off = masked_id - id_base;
> + if (masked_id < id_base || id_off >= id_len)
> + continue;
> +
> if (arg->target) {
> if (*arg->target)
> of_node_put(phandle_node);
> @@ -2133,12 +2186,14 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (arg->id_out)
> - *arg->id_out = masked_id - id_base + out_base;
> + for (int i = 0; arg->id_out && i < cells; i++)
> + arg->id_out[i] = id_off + be32_to_cpu(out_base[i]);
>
> + if (arg->map_cells)
> + *arg->map_cells = cells;
> pr_debug("%pOF: %s, using mask %08x, id-base: %08x, out-base: %08x, length: %08x, id: %08x -> %08x\n",
> - np, map_name, map_mask, id_base, out_base,
> - id_len, id, masked_id - id_base + out_base);
> + np, map_name, map_mask, id_base, be32_to_cpup(out_base),
> + id_len, id, id_off + be32_to_cpup(out_base));
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -2149,5 +2204,9 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> if (arg->id_out)
> *arg->id_out = id;
> return 0;
> +
> +err_map_len:
> + pr_err("%pOF: Error: Bad %s length: %d\n", np, map_name, map_bytes);
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_map_id);
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index 21bdce2b37ca..1981509c7918 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct device_node;
> struct of_map_id_arg {
> struct device_node **target;
> u32 *id_out;
> + u32 *map_cells;
> };
>
> struct property {
> @@ -462,9 +463,9 @@ const char *of_prop_next_string(const struct property *prop, const char *cur);
>
> bool of_console_check(const struct device_node *dn, char *name, int index);
>
> -int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> - const char *map_name, const char *map_mask_name,
> - struct of_map_id_arg *arg);
> +int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
> + const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
> + struct of_map_id_arg *arg);
>
> phys_addr_t of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(struct device_node *np);
>
> @@ -911,9 +912,9 @@ static inline void of_property_clear_flag(struct property *p, unsigned long flag
> {
> }
>
> -static inline int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> - const char *map_name, const char *map_mask_name,
> - struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
> +static inline int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
> + const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
> + struct of_map_id_arg *arg);
> {
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -1444,7 +1445,7 @@ static inline int of_property_read_s32(const struct device_node *np,
> static inline int of_map_iommu_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
> {
> - return of_map_id(np, id, "iommu-map", "iommu-map-mask", arg);
> + return of_map_id(np, id, "iommu-map", "#iommu-cells", "iommu-map-mask", arg);
> }
>
> static inline int of_map_msi_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> @@ -1455,7 +1456,7 @@ static inline int of_map_msi_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> .id_out = id_out,
> };
>
> - return of_map_id(np, id, "msi-map", "msi-map-mask", &arg);
> + return of_map_id(np, id, "msi-map", "#msi-cells", "msi-map-mask", &arg);
There are cases of no #msi-cells and we default to 0 cells in that case.
Do you maintain that?
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-09 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-04 9:55 [PATCH v2 0/3] of: parsing of multi #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps Vijayanand Jitta
2025-12-04 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] of: Add convenience wrappers for of_map_id() Vijayanand Jitta
2025-12-09 19:59 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-12-04 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] of: factor arguments passed to of_map_id() into a struct Vijayanand Jitta
2025-12-05 16:47 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-12-08 13:40 ` Vijayanand Jitta
2025-12-09 20:02 ` Rob Herring
2025-12-10 10:29 ` Vijayanand Jitta
2025-12-04 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps Vijayanand Jitta
2025-12-05 3:28 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-05 4:01 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-05 4:33 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-09 20:17 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2025-12-10 10:27 ` Vijayanand Jitta
2025-12-10 21:04 ` Rob Herring
2025-12-11 5:31 ` Vijayanand Jitta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251209201725.GB1015230-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=bod@kernel.org \
--cc=charan.kalla@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prakash.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=vikash.garodia@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.