From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kernel@openeuler.org, Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [openeuler:OLK-6.6 3508/3508] drivers/acpi/pptt.c:309:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'acpi_pptt_for_each_container'
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 14:49:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202512111416.5evNsB79-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6
head: 5930fa3740c518a9f6ba688fd0c1873d6f3adbce
commit: 1ab6383ee94e788fe424d7eac10dc8ec3bfa6828 [3508/3508] ACPI / PPTT: Provide a helper to walk processor containers
config: arm64-allnoconfig-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251211/202512111416.5evNsB79-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4125e73cdc6188cca4c1c72b72e2b2d85c157483)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251211/202512111416.5evNsB79-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512111416.5evNsB79-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from <built-in>:3:
In file included from ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:150:
./include/linux/compiler-clang.h:33:9: warning: '__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined]
33 | #define __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__
| ^
<built-in>:367:9: note: previous definition is here
367 | #define __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ 1
| ^
In file included from drivers/acpi/pptt.c:20:
In file included from ./include/linux/acpi.h:37:
In file included from ./include/acpi/acpi_io.h:7:
In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h:14:
In file included from ./include/linux/memblock.h:12:
In file included from ./include/linux/mm.h:2181:
./include/linux/vmstat.h:508:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
508 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
509 | item];
| ~~~~
./include/linux/vmstat.h:515:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
515 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
516 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/vmstat.h:522:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
522 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
./include/linux/vmstat.h:527:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
527 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
528 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/vmstat.h:536:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
536 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
537 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/acpi/pptt.c:309:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'acpi_pptt_for_each_container' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
309 | int acpi_pptt_for_each_container(acpi_pptt_cpu_callback_t callback, void *arg)
| ^
drivers/acpi/pptt.c:309:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
309 | int acpi_pptt_for_each_container(acpi_pptt_cpu_callback_t callback, void *arg)
| ^
| static
7 warnings generated.
--
>> drivers/acpi/pptt.c:310: warning: Function parameter or member 'callback' not described in 'acpi_pptt_for_each_container'
>> drivers/acpi/pptt.c:310: warning: Function parameter or member 'arg' not described in 'acpi_pptt_for_each_container'
vim +/acpi_pptt_for_each_container +309 drivers/acpi/pptt.c
297
298 /**
299 * acpi_pptt_for_each_container() - Iterate over all processor containers
300 *
301 * Not all 'Processor' entries in the PPTT are either a CPU or a Processor
302 * Container, they may exist purely to describe a Private resource. CPUs
303 * have to be leaves, so a Processor Container is a non-leaf that has the
304 * 'ACPI Processor ID valid' flag set.
305 *
306 * Return: 0 for a complete walk, or the first non-zero value from the callback
307 * that stopped the walk.
308 */
> 309 int acpi_pptt_for_each_container(acpi_pptt_cpu_callback_t callback, void *arg)
> 310 {
311 struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
312 struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr;
313 struct acpi_subtable_header *entry;
314 bool leaf_flag, has_leaf_flag = false;
315 unsigned long table_end;
316 acpi_status status;
317 u32 proc_sz;
318 int ret = 0;
319
320 status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table_hdr);
321 if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
322 return 0;
323
324 if (table_hdr->revision > 1)
325 has_leaf_flag = true;
326
327 table_end = (unsigned long)table_hdr + table_hdr->length;
328 entry = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_subtable_header, table_hdr,
329 sizeof(struct acpi_table_pptt));
330 proc_sz = sizeof(struct acpi_pptt_processor);
331 while ((unsigned long)entry + proc_sz < table_end) {
332 cpu_node = (struct acpi_pptt_processor *)entry;
333 if (entry->type == ACPI_PPTT_TYPE_PROCESSOR &&
334 cpu_node->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_PROCESSOR_ID_VALID)
335 {
336 leaf_flag = cpu_node->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_LEAF_NODE;
337 if ((has_leaf_flag && !leaf_flag) ||
338 (!has_leaf_flag && !acpi_pptt_leaf_node(table_hdr, cpu_node)))
339 {
340 ret = callback(cpu_node, arg);
341 if (ret)
342 break;
343 }
344 }
345 entry = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_subtable_header, entry,
346 entry->length);
347 }
348
349 acpi_put_table(table_hdr);
350
351 return ret;
352 }
353
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2025-12-11 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202512111416.5evNsB79-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=kernel@openeuler.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.