From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 828BB25785D; Sat, 13 Dec 2025 02:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765592754; cv=none; b=iaMnpFHLb6DQX0oLFcA9g4AaRm7oulEotHltkOA6wlEXid97Pf/KZK0eVZrB5mGdhoj7SRIldyZhoALRXbDMNutCF9Plj5AEfZBtkTh3Tv/9lnsnPk5WlMXmuaNcyn26slgkUcVHYFX6o4x0vLAbR/cNi7uWzVmSmWRWfNgInqo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765592754; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2w++B4WUtAp0/JiOA04XB107DnE+ME+g0WvUCAa9Ps0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hWeCFcbxXgZmQUSvcBfiL4O2+xBhK15nEWvHMk1+arWOcHYH7qgmqahrMEXpMmkSgt/sEOTZnfCCD1wsCqGobWBoI2k4uAzMinEVsVvCdKA3vXweMx4LMLu/8NKIRdBlMyjPJ4rfRk9G6+MZAnTtgOqtbQhFe/cS9T95bXrghJ8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hcoeoAK2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hcoeoAK2" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1765592752; x=1797128752; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=2w++B4WUtAp0/JiOA04XB107DnE+ME+g0WvUCAa9Ps0=; b=hcoeoAK23e0ZccLCOec1cJHkV4Z4BG84R4wMxoWAHGIBkRWXafHJLU3P J+d2jDVZnO2WJnb4AFw0IOY68fjmI/6W3SexPJ1jWm3a1BjViWZ1rC8em ceRbDV7uOaX4B7YS7X6iWR1+26MALX3BKXsOMPcvx8CQatyXuOSWB6AQE JpmYHnOPQBI9XL8SVeM/fnGxFR78r11tovJZf+MqLw+adUwjIwp62blia g5M3AxnN8x8wt5nULGeZWCcg2cSjyOkA1siQmrZLFODzk0ycpARQUVT5n REBoHQ8Liek253x8flOfNaoMJx/OHxjx9U3BqyQPRrlonU55PdM1Dynq8 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ARbm/jDNQUawS1MypHfCDQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 02WuGP5qTjWVylLDdXEOng== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11640"; a="66768505" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,145,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="66768505" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Dec 2025 18:25:52 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: LR0lYWYORh2qL4yn3dKifw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: zVrnVWYBRfuDE/3yD+Vl4w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,145,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="196305677" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d335e3c6db51) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Dec 2025 18:25:51 -0800 Received: from kbuild by d335e3c6db51 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vUFKO-000000006w9-0zEK; Sat, 13 Dec 2025 02:25:48 +0000 Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2025 10:25:47 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Blaise Boscaccy Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC 08/11] security: Hornet LSM Message-ID: <202512131027.LzV9ipd8-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251211021257.1208712-9-bboscaccy@linux.microsoft.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251211021257.1208712-9-bboscaccy@linux.microsoft.com> Hi Blaise, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on herbert-cryptodev-2.6/master] [also build test ERROR on herbert-crypto-2.6/master shuah-kselftest/next shuah-kselftest/fixes linus/master v6.18] [cannot apply to next-20251212] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Blaise-Boscaccy/lsm-framework-for-BPF-integrity-verification/20251211-102027 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/cryptodev-2.6.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251211021257.1208712-9-bboscaccy%40linux.microsoft.com patch subject: [RFC 08/11] security: Hornet LSM config: x86_64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251213/202512131027.LzV9ipd8-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251213/202512131027.LzV9ipd8-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512131027.LzV9ipd8-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> security/hornet/hornet_lsm.c:20:10: fatal error: 'hornet.asn1.h' file not found 20 | #include "hornet.asn1.h" | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 error generated. vim +20 security/hornet/hornet_lsm.c > 20 #include "hornet.asn1.h" 21 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki