From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, clm@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: make sure to fail try_to_unlazy() and try_to_unlazy() for LOOKUP_CACHED
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 09:08:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251217090833.GS1712166@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251217084704.2323682-1-mjguzik@gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 09:47:04AM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> Otherwise the slowpath can be taken by the caller, defeating the flag.
>
> This regressed after calls to legitimize_links() started being
> conditionally elided and stems from the routine always failing
> after seeing the flag, regardless if there were any links.
>
> In order to address both the bug and the weird semantics make it illegal
> to call legitimize_links() with LOOKUP_CACHED and handle the problem at
> the two callsites.
>
> Pull up ->depth = 0 to drop_links() to avoid repeating it in the
> callers.
>
> One remaining weirdness is terminate_walk() walking the symlink stack
> after drop_links().
What weirdness? If we are not in RCU mode, we need to drop symlink bodies
*and* drop symlink references?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-17 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-17 8:47 [PATCH v2] fs: make sure to fail try_to_unlazy() and try_to_unlazy() for LOOKUP_CACHED Mateusz Guzik
2025-12-17 9:08 ` Al Viro [this message]
2025-12-17 9:11 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-12-17 10:06 ` Al Viro
2025-12-17 10:13 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-12-17 10:27 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-12-17 10:48 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251217090833.GS1712166@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.