From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D40221FB4 for ; Sun, 21 Dec 2025 18:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766340825; cv=none; b=dSSRgQMGmMuxsoCAez0vyz0l6mPWgdAMpGgbeJQO/dFnq72e8RnZi74hE7b5hvzzn7qhsF3T/eEmR5HjSv06FsmbtAVlSjAL0W54ZXeqJLEadRA995Ogy106JxWePyzShuwmZzTvD7KXpb9M0AamiTT9m+7aFIYnRGwY8HtsI0k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766340825; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vDhok3mumGA9dSx7d5ldGfOJO7stu5h7N1ywv0Xu9o8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=L1Hi4aj6SPp/3QodxShLmt7OFGcvhWMsMgvmOWV0xKbm1vswUAysCwhKHXVEZKL/tswZu+fg+gyLhOaPYGbJ4t8kZmuL2rWXZ8ta/xFWNALMdR6Mtw2mI0BixH7o5rlZ8NgN06NO1vqnnZWM/kWHinu/2L2CkFi+JaqH5kFq1jQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=WOgIePWo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="WOgIePWo" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1766340824; x=1797876824; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=vDhok3mumGA9dSx7d5ldGfOJO7stu5h7N1ywv0Xu9o8=; b=WOgIePWoihAi/8jfetPEbyYkZjDmdWSVm6LSL81BwqdpFReoiNQKPUL2 Jq/H5ci+aLgbR8FK/T1AFALnX2Ge4z4ieB9ClgSLpwZNYEshzlQMDL291 kLg/naqFeqMsGbWqY5boyfUiNoOGneIB/3PG04UIPtkyDZbJQiwbnwKws mW8ja8Kf4ldwCxK7gE9Qqvyo90OMBrZ/KqP+5ZxfJLRr+h3pN3NBy8z3Y aI3tVBhVdvfELJYC1CVfT+c72kwhr+4rUlUwoRIRngbCuBW9kGQLgCY6G ziU+9BSSy649QcigXzBDOF6MDhTGlObHDxusRZEy4DSHmcM0x73FWcDmh Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: FDZ3/hcFR8qVvsxN3xTibw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: T+TDGR2fS8qwW9mktT7pQQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11649"; a="78932791" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,166,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="78932791" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Dec 2025 10:13:43 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Cu/3exryTFWZMIEmUIBoqQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: L5z/XYbxRdGOoGWO+3uNLg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,166,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="203874061" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 0d09efa1b85f) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2025 10:13:42 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 0d09efa1b85f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vXNw3-000000005w3-26os; Sun, 21 Dec 2025 18:13:39 +0000 Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 02:13:31 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: kernel@openeuler.org, Zheng Zengkai Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [openeuler:OLK-5.10 3415/3415] arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c:40:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'printk_safe_exit'; did you mean 'printk_nmi_exit'? Message-ID: <202512220254.DKUPaC7y-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Li, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: 1588d318a9e388d05b6cf5e2a63134c8beb6a355 commit: f86d165bfe5f6248743774bb07af0bd7cff12443 [3415/3415] arm64: Add non nmi ipi backtrace support config: arm64-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251222/202512220254.DKUPaC7y-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251222/202512220254.DKUPaC7y-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512220254.DKUPaC7y-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c: In function 'ipi_cpu_backtrace': arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c:38:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'printk_safe_enter'; did you mean 'printk_nmi_enter'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 38 | printk_safe_enter(); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | printk_nmi_enter >> arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c:40:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'printk_safe_exit'; did you mean 'printk_nmi_exit'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 40 | printk_safe_exit(); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | printk_nmi_exit cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +40 arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c 35 36 static void ipi_cpu_backtrace(void *info) 37 { > 38 printk_safe_enter(); 39 nmi_cpu_backtrace(get_irq_regs()); > 40 printk_safe_exit(); 41 } 42 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki