From: "Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>
To: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>
Cc: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, lossin@kernel.org,
lyude@redhat.com, ojeda@kernel.org, alex.gaynor@gmail.com,
boqun.feng@gmail.com, gary@garyguo.net, a.hindborg@kernel.org,
aliceryhl@google.com, tmgross@umich.edu, dakr@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
longman@redhat.com, felipe_life@live.com, daniel@sedlak.dev,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/6] rust: implement Class for ww_class support
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 13:00:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251225130000.429629db@nimda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C57F6478-F365-4FCB-B4B2-7ADB6B4793E3@collabora.com>
On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:59:59 -0300
Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@collabora.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
> Hi Onur,
>
> > On 1 Dec 2025, at 07:28, Onur Özkan <work@onurozkan.dev> wrote:
> >
> > Adds the Class type, the first step in supporting
> > ww_mutex in Rust. Class represents ww_class, used
> > for deadlock avoidance for supporting both wait-die
> > and wound-wait semantics.
> >
> > Also adds the define_class macro for safely declaring
> > static instances.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Onur Özkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
> > ---
> > rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs | 1 +
> > rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex.rs | 7 ++
> > rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex/class.rs | 156
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 164 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex.rs
> > create mode 100644 rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex/class.rs
> >
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
> > index 27202beef90c..5b320c2b28c1 100644
> > --- a/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
> > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> >
> > pub mod mutex;
> > pub mod spinlock;
> > +pub mod ww_mutex;
> >
> > pub(super) mod global;
> > pub use global::{GlobalGuard, GlobalLock, GlobalLockBackend,
> > GlobalLockedBy}; diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex.rs
> > b/rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex.rs new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..727c51cc73af
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex.rs
> > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +//! Rust abstractions for the kernel's wound-wait locking
> > primitives.
>
> Can you link to the docs here?
>
> > +
> > +pub use class::Class;
> > +
> > +mod class;
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex/class.rs
> > b/rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex/class.rs new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..b0753093f1e0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex/class.rs
> > @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +//! Provides [`Class`] to group wound/wait mutexes to be acquired
> > together +//! and specifies which deadlock avoidance algorithm to
> > use (e.g., wound-wait +//! or wait-die).
> > +//!
> > +//! The [`define_class`] macro and
> > [`Class::new_wait_die`]/[`Class::new_wound_wait`] +//! constructors
> > provide safe ways to create classes. +
> > +use crate::bindings;
> > +use crate::prelude::*;
> > +use crate::types::Opaque;
> > +
> > +/// Creates static [`Class`] instances.
> > +///
> > +/// # Examples
> > +///
> > +/// ```
> > +/// use kernel::{c_str, define_class};
> > +///
> > +/// define_class!(WOUND_WAIT_GLOBAL_CLASS, wound_wait,
> > c_str!("wound_wait_global_class")); +///
> > define_class!(WAIT_DIE_GLOBAL_CLASS, wait_die,
> > c_str!("wait_die_global_class")); +/// ``` +#[macro_export]
> > +macro_rules! define_class {
> > + ($name:ident, wound_wait, $class_name:expr) => {
> > + static $name: $crate::sync::lock::ww_mutex::Class =
> > + // SAFETY: This is `static`, so address is fixed and
> > won't move.
> > + unsafe {
> > $crate::sync::lock::ww_mutex::Class::unpinned_new($class_name,
> > false) };
> > + };
> > + ($name:ident, wait_die, $class_name:expr) => {
> > + static $name: $crate::sync::lock::ww_mutex::Class =
> > + // SAFETY: This is `static`, so address is fixed and
> > won't move.
> > + unsafe {
> > $crate::sync::lock::ww_mutex::Class::unpinned_new($class_name,
> > true) };
> > + };
> > +}
> > +
> > +/// Used to group mutexes together for deadlock avoidance.
> > +///
> > +/// All mutexes that might be acquired together should use the
> > same class. +///
> > +/// # Examples
> > +///
> > +/// ```
> > +/// use kernel::sync::lock::ww_mutex::Class;
> > +/// use kernel::c_str;
> > +/// use pin_init::stack_pin_init;
> > +///
> > +/// stack_pin_init!(let _wait_die_class =
> > Class::new_wait_die(c_str!("some_class"))); +///
> > stack_pin_init!(let _wound_wait_class =
> > Class::new_wound_wait(c_str!("some_other_class"))); +/// +/// #
> > Ok::<(), Error>(()) +/// ```
> > +#[pin_data]
> > +#[repr(transparent)]
> > +pub struct Class {
> > + #[pin]
> > + pub(super) inner: Opaque<bindings::ww_class>,
>
> Do you plan on ever extending this? A tuple struct might make more
> sense otherwise.
>
I can't find any usage of `#[pin]` inside a tupple. Is it even possible?
> > +}
> > +
> > +// SAFETY: [`Class`] is set up once and never modified. It's fine
> > to share it across threads.
>
> > +unsafe impl Sync for Class {}
> > +// SAFETY: Doesn't hold anything thread-specific. It's safe to
> > send to other threads. +unsafe impl Send for Class {}
>
> Please keep Foo and impl Foo together. The very next thing one wants
> to see after a type definition is its implementation.
>
> i.e.:
>
> struct Foo;
>
> impl Foo {…}
>
> impl Bar for Foo {…}
>
> > +
> > +impl Class {
> > + /// Creates an unpinned [`Class`].
> > + ///
> > + /// # Safety
> > + ///
> > + /// Caller must guarantee that the returned value is not moved
> > after creation.
> > + pub const unsafe fn unpinned_new(name: &'static CStr,
> > is_wait_die: bool) -> Self {
>
> IMHO new_unpinned() would be a better name. Also, where is this used?
>
> By the way, this will immediately move Self out of this function,
> which is technically after its creation (i.e.: it’s after the Class
> {…} construct). Is this ok?
>
It's meant to be used from the `define_class` macro. I will update the
comment to make it more clear.
>
>
> > + Class {
> > + inner: Opaque::new(bindings::ww_class {
> > + stamp: bindings::atomic_long_t { counter: 0 },
> > + acquire_name: name.as_char_ptr(),
> > + mutex_name: name.as_char_ptr(),
> > + is_wait_die: is_wait_die as u32,
> > + // TODO: Replace with
> > `bindings::lock_class_key::default()` once
> > + // stabilized for `const`.
> > + //
> > + // SAFETY: This is always zero-initialized when
> > defined with
> > + // `DEFINE_WD_CLASS` globally on C side.
> > + //
> > + // For reference, see __WW_CLASS_INITIALIZER() in
> > + // "include/linux/ww_mutex.h".
> > + acquire_key: unsafe { core::mem::zeroed() },
> > + // TODO: Replace with
> > `bindings::lock_class_key::default()` once
> > + // stabilized for `const`.
> > + //
> > + // SAFETY: This is always zero-initialized when
> > defined with
> > + // `DEFINE_WD_CLASS` globally on C side.
> > + //
> > + // For reference, see __WW_CLASS_INITIALIZER() in
> > + // "include/linux/ww_mutex.h".
> > + mutex_key: unsafe { core::mem::zeroed() },
> > + }),
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /// Creates a [`Class`].
> > + ///
> > + /// You should not use this function directly. Use the
> > [`define_class!`]
> > + /// macro or call [`Class::new_wait_die`] or
> > [`Class::new_wound_wait`] instead.
> > + fn new(name: &'static CStr, is_wait_die: bool) -> impl
> > PinInit<Self> {
> > + pin_init! {
> > + Self {
> > + inner <- Opaque::ffi_init(|slot: *mut
> > bindings::ww_class| {
> > + // SAFETY: The fields are being initialized.
> > The `name` pointer is valid for a
> > + // static lifetime. The keys are zeroed, which
> > is what the C side does.
> > + unsafe {
> > + slot.write(bindings::ww_class {
> > + stamp: bindings::atomic_long_t {
> > counter: 0 },
> > + acquire_name: name.as_char_ptr(),
> > + mutex_name: name.as_char_ptr(),
> > + is_wait_die: is_wait_die.into(),
> > + // TODO: Replace with
> > `bindings::lock_class_key::default()` once
> > + // stabilized for `const`.
> > + //
> > + // SAFETY: This is always
> > zero-initialized when defined with
> > + // `DEFINE_WD_CLASS` globally on C
> > side.
> > + //
> > + // For reference, see
> > __WW_CLASS_INITIALIZER() in
> > + // "include/linux/ww_mutex.h".
> > + acquire_key: core::mem::zeroed(),
> > + mutex_key: core::mem::zeroed(),
> > + });
> > + }
> > + }),
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /// Creates wait-die [`Class`].
> > + pub fn new_wait_die(name: &'static CStr) -> impl PinInit<Self>
> > {
> > + Self::new(name, true)
> > + }
> > +
> > + /// Creates wound-wait [`Class`].
> > + pub fn new_wound_wait(name: &'static CStr) -> impl
> > PinInit<Self> {
> > + Self::new(name, false)
> > + }
> > +
> > + /// Creates a [`Class`] from a raw pointer.
> > + ///
> > + /// This function is intended for interoperability with C code.
> > + ///
> > + /// # Safety
> > + ///
> > + /// The caller must ensure that `ptr` points to the `inner`
> > field of
> > + /// [`Class`] and that it remains valid for the lifetime `'a`.
> > + pub const unsafe fn from_raw<'a>(ptr: *mut bindings::ww_class)
> > -> &'a Self {
> > + // SAFETY: By the safety contract, `ptr` is valid to
> > construct `Class`.
> > + unsafe { &*ptr.cast() }
> > + }
> > +}
> > --
> > 2.51.2
> >
> >
>
Regards,
Onur
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-25 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-01 10:28 [PATCH v8 0/6] rust: add ww_mutex support Onur Özkan
2025-12-01 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] rust: add C wrappers for ww_mutex inline functions Onur Özkan
2025-12-02 17:38 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-15 13:06 ` Gary Guo
2025-12-01 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] ww_mutex: add `ww_class` field unconditionally Onur Özkan
2025-12-02 17:42 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-01 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] rust: error: add EDEADLK Onur Özkan
2025-12-02 17:43 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-01 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] rust: implement Class for ww_class support Onur Özkan
2025-12-02 17:59 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-25 10:00 ` Onur Özkan [this message]
2025-12-03 13:10 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-12-03 16:06 ` Onur Özkan
2025-12-01 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] rust: ww_mutex: add Mutex, AcquireCtx and MutexGuard Onur Özkan
2025-12-02 1:49 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-02 10:20 ` Onur Özkan
2025-12-02 18:29 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-03 15:49 ` Onur Özkan
2025-12-03 13:26 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-12-03 16:02 ` Onur Özkan
2025-12-04 9:08 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-12-03 17:23 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-04 9:07 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-12-04 13:26 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-04 13:33 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-12-15 9:10 ` Onur Özkan
2025-12-17 8:54 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-12-01 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] rust: ww_mutex: implement LockSet Onur Özkan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251225130000.429629db@nimda \
--to=work@onurozkan.dev \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=daniel@sedlak.dev \
--cc=felipe_life@live.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.