From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE21336C0C8; Sat, 3 Oct 2026 01:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790991030; cv=none; b=lON+yUu6EFnDvL8p+TfvwdxZJ88A+1N58coFHGHwHkEIONz8zbYSNN3xym5E1I89/zez80R/GJuN9rDgxvzv9NlcjePVlodtWrdKp4vCHNz3wcFEBz4AgJsmzYkaHVf68rhShONZwxv9HDYglsa8lR+XV6qNx4Ly1j5ztKeeS+U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790991030; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9neaJEqXLm78Lub6Cptf3c98xf1kvuLwiAn0r+/bi48=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=etfDYvPsFx4r/wIZ86E3+ZsecISwVOmjEHEaA32MOenR7pi18RmCnhNUFj7F5ACLtDii/+/bK3+GKy4kWVk+Sewk/JAzF/bEMDMkJseCVJPZBvhJKtoZyQ1zNdVb0LkR+TPcRhzIhh/m+ZKCo2JotIPc5UQUNr7ncGV2QvpZpxU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=klHomOmK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="klHomOmK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2F0C1F000FF; Sat, 3 Oct 2026 01:30:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790991029; bh=Xk+kCWiTfDSIfOY/Ms53i5aLtnjPXav8HPPGta528wE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=klHomOmKE9REbANo4ncYXS6JYcjEZueJN3x/qvwyKMWhpQop2fG6bipJZejwagxxu MYpmUoUBc2B0I4uKoNLX3mqOJ3HWIMKCyHYynN/acQni6UmlTB8167+0MKA+6tc8wk 8yhs/gjlMUzXLv+f5Ituz4JpzeAraS7FCCTu2X/qrDRDwMrKsEssOzaABT/BaUT/kP z5nbLfTJE3ot+PsQLQEPn7FOJmmNGwzNGrI+Ei6iiF5U7zE/8ejEvwt0amdrZmTmzc K4JVQkhC4Cxg457uRfUBH73npR7/t/uGIh6txrFttwGw0vPgsZjNCjEh7Bc33lqeyN HV5IVKfYZ5Nqw== From: Sasha Levin To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Sasha Levin , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Julian Sun , Jan Kara , "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" , Harshit Mogalapalli Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 341/877] fs: avoid repeated scans in evict_inodes() Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 21:30:21 -0400 Message-ID: <2026-10-02-rc-reply-0001-re-evict-inodes@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20260930152414.738996857@linuxfoundation.org> <20260930152422.027976780@linuxfoundation.org> <0fee0444-1e42-4b1f-b7ac-234b5e19bb43@oracle.com> <2026100223-idealist-eatery-53bc@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Please drop this stable backport. Dropped from the 6.12, 6.6, 6.1, 5.15 and 5.10 queues, thanks. It stays in 7.2 and 6.18: their bases already have 3bc4e4410830 ("vfs: Remove unnecessary list_for_each_entry_safe() from evict_inodes()"), so evict_inodes() there already walks the list with list_for_each_entry(). -- Thanks, Sasha