Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add alloc_id/free_id functions to arm_smmu_invs

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>]

On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 10:52:53AM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 01:05:51PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > +static int arm_smmu_get_tag(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> > +			    struct arm_smmu_master *master,
> > +			    struct arm_vsmmu *vsmmu,
> > +			    struct arm_smmu_iotlb_tag *tag, bool no_alloc)
> [...]
> > +	case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S2:
> > +		if (smmu_domain->nest_parent) {
> > +			/* FIXME we can support attaching a nest_parent without
> > +			 * a vsmmu, but to do that we need to fix
> > +			 * arm_smmu_get_id_from_invs() to never return the vmid
> > +			 * of a vsmmu. Probably by making a
> > +			 * INV_TYPE_S2_VMID_VSMMU */
> > +			id = vsmmu->vmid;
> > +			return 0;
> > +		}
> 
> Would you mind elaborating why arm_smmu_get_id_from_invs() can't
> return vsmmu->vmid to share with a naked S2 STE?

A "naked" S2 domain doesn't have a pointer to the vsmmu, so it is
impossible to get vsmmu->vmid.

The only domains which have it are nested domains using a bypass vSTE.

So, if userspace attaches a bypass vSTE then it should use vsmmu->vmid

However if they attach a raw S2 HWPT without a vSTE then there is no
vsmmu and it should work like any other S2 attach and allocate a VMID
for this domain, ignoring any vSMMU that may exist.

In sort, the only case where we use the vsmmu->vmid is for vSTEs.

Jason