All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/3] virtio-net: remove unused delayed refill worker
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 04:09:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260103040903-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260102152023.10773-3-minhquangbui99@gmail.com>

On Fri, Jan 02, 2026 at 10:20:22PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote:
> Since we change to retry refilling receive buffer in NAPI poll instead

change->switched

> of delayed worker, remove all unused delayed refill worker code.

unused -> now unused

> 
> Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 86 ----------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 86 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index ac514c9383ae..7e77a05b5662 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -441,9 +441,6 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>  	/* Packet virtio header size */
>  	u8 hdr_len;
>  
> -	/* Work struct for delayed refilling if we run low on memory. */
> -	struct delayed_work refill;
> -
>  	/* UDP tunnel support */
>  	bool tx_tnl;
>  
> @@ -451,12 +448,6 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>  
>  	bool rx_tnl_csum;
>  
> -	/* Is delayed refill enabled? */
> -	bool refill_enabled;
> -
> -	/* The lock to synchronize the access to refill_enabled */
> -	spinlock_t refill_lock;
> -
>  	/* Work struct for config space updates */
>  	struct work_struct config_work;
>  
> @@ -720,20 +711,6 @@ static void virtnet_rq_free_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>  		put_page(virt_to_head_page(buf));
>  }
>  
> -static void enable_delayed_refill(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> -{
> -	spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
> -	vi->refill_enabled = true;
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
> -}
> -
> -static void disable_delayed_refill(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> -{
> -	spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
> -	vi->refill_enabled = false;
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
> -}
> -
>  static void enable_rx_mode_work(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>  {
>  	rtnl_lock();
> @@ -2948,42 +2925,6 @@ static void virtnet_napi_disable(struct receive_queue *rq)
>  	napi_disable(napi);
>  }
>  
> -static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
> -{
> -	struct virtnet_info *vi =
> -		container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, refill.work);
> -	bool still_empty;
> -	int i;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
> -		struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * When queue API support is added in the future and the call
> -		 * below becomes napi_disable_locked, this driver will need to
> -		 * be refactored.
> -		 *
> -		 * One possible solution would be to:
> -		 *   - cancel refill_work with cancel_delayed_work (note:
> -		 *     non-sync)
> -		 *   - cancel refill_work with cancel_delayed_work_sync in
> -		 *     virtnet_remove after the netdev is unregistered
> -		 *   - wrap all of the work in a lock (perhaps the netdev
> -		 *     instance lock)
> -		 *   - check netif_running() and return early to avoid a race
> -		 */
> -		napi_disable(&rq->napi);
> -		still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		virtnet_napi_do_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi);
> -
> -		/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
> -		 * we will *never* try to fill again.
> -		 */
> -		if (still_empty)
> -			schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, HZ/2);
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static int virtnet_receive_xsk_bufs(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>  				    struct receive_queue *rq,
>  				    int budget,
> @@ -3222,8 +3163,6 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>  	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>  	int i, err;
>  
> -	enable_delayed_refill(vi);
> -
>  	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>  		if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
>  			/* If this fails, we will retry later in
> @@ -3249,9 +3188,6 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>  	return 0;
>  
>  err_enable_qp:
> -	disable_delayed_refill(vi);
> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
> -
>  	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
>  		virtnet_disable_queue_pair(vi, i);
>  		virtnet_cancel_dim(vi, &vi->rq[i].dim);
> @@ -3445,24 +3381,12 @@ static void virtnet_rx_pause_all(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Make sure refill_work does not run concurrently to
> -	 * avoid napi_disable race which leads to deadlock.
> -	 */
> -	disable_delayed_refill(vi);
> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>  	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
>  		__virtnet_rx_pause(vi, &vi->rq[i]);
>  }
>  
>  static void virtnet_rx_pause(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq)
>  {
> -	/*
> -	 * Make sure refill_work does not run concurrently to
> -	 * avoid napi_disable race which leads to deadlock.
> -	 */
> -	disable_delayed_refill(vi);
> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>  	__virtnet_rx_pause(vi, rq);
>  }
>  
> @@ -3486,7 +3410,6 @@ static void virtnet_rx_resume_all(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> -	enable_delayed_refill(vi);
>  	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>  		if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
>  			__virtnet_rx_resume(vi, &vi->rq[i], true);
> @@ -3497,7 +3420,6 @@ static void virtnet_rx_resume_all(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>  
>  static void virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq)
>  {
> -	enable_delayed_refill(vi);
>  	__virtnet_rx_resume(vi, rq, true);
>  }
>  
> @@ -3848,10 +3770,6 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev)
>  	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>  	int i;
>  
> -	/* Make sure NAPI doesn't schedule refill work */
> -	disable_delayed_refill(vi);
> -	/* Make sure refill_work doesn't re-enable napi! */
> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>  	/* Prevent the config change callback from changing carrier
>  	 * after close
>  	 */
> @@ -5807,7 +5725,6 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  
>  	virtio_device_ready(vdev);
>  
> -	enable_delayed_refill(vi);
>  	enable_rx_mode_work(vi);
>  
>  	if (netif_running(vi->dev)) {
> @@ -6564,7 +6481,6 @@ static int virtnet_alloc_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>  	if (!vi->rq)
>  		goto err_rq;
>  
> -	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&vi->refill, refill_work);
>  	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>  		vi->rq[i].pages = NULL;
>  		netif_napi_add_config(vi->dev, &vi->rq[i].napi, virtnet_poll,
> @@ -6906,7 +6822,6 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  
>  	INIT_WORK(&vi->config_work, virtnet_config_changed_work);
>  	INIT_WORK(&vi->rx_mode_work, virtnet_rx_mode_work);
> -	spin_lock_init(&vi->refill_lock);
>  
>  	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) {
>  		vi->mergeable_rx_bufs = true;
> @@ -7170,7 +7085,6 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  	net_failover_destroy(vi->failover);
>  free_vqs:
>  	virtio_reset_device(vdev);
> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>  	free_receive_page_frags(vi);
>  	virtnet_del_vqs(vi);
>  free:
> -- 
> 2.43.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-03  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-02 15:20 [PATCH net v2 0/3] virtio-net: fix the deadlock when disabling rx NAPI Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-02 15:20 ` [PATCH net v2 1/3] virtio-net: don't schedule delayed refill worker Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-03  0:16   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-03 16:57   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-03 17:34     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-04  4:33     ` Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-04 13:24       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-04  6:09   ` Jason Wang
2026-01-04  8:34     ` Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-04 14:03       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-04 14:54         ` Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-04 15:12           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-05 15:03             ` Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-05 20:35               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-04 13:25     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-02 15:20 ` [PATCH net v2 2/3] virtio-net: remove unused " Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-03  9:09   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-01-02 15:20 ` [PATCH net v2 3/3] virtio-net: clean up __virtnet_rx_pause/resume Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-03  9:13 ` [PATCH net v2 0/3] virtio-net: fix the deadlock when disabling rx NAPI Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260103040903-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minhquangbui99@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.