From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 15/30] KVM: arm64: Refactor enter_exception64()
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 15:49:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260105154939.11041-16-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260105154939.11041-1-will@kernel.org>
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
In order to simplify the injection of exceptions in the host in pkvm
context, refactor enter_exception64() to separate the code calculating
the exception offset from VBAR_EL1 and the cpsr.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 5 ++
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index c9eab316398e..c3f04bd5b2a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ static inline int kvm_inject_serror(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return kvm_inject_serror_esr(vcpu, ESR_ELx_ISV);
}
+unsigned long get_except64_offset(unsigned long psr, unsigned long target_mode,
+ enum exception_type type);
+unsigned long get_except64_cpsr(unsigned long old, bool has_mte,
+ unsigned long sctlr, unsigned long mode);
+
void kvm_vcpu_wfi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_emulate_nested_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
index bef40ddb16db..d3bcda665612 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
@@ -65,12 +65,25 @@ static void __vcpu_write_spsr_und(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_und = val;
}
+unsigned long get_except64_offset(unsigned long psr, unsigned long target_mode,
+ enum exception_type type)
+{
+ u64 mode = psr & (PSR_MODE_MASK | PSR_MODE32_BIT);
+ u64 exc_offset;
+
+ if (mode == target_mode)
+ exc_offset = CURRENT_EL_SP_ELx_VECTOR;
+ else if ((mode | PSR_MODE_THREAD_BIT) == target_mode)
+ exc_offset = CURRENT_EL_SP_EL0_VECTOR;
+ else if (!(mode & PSR_MODE32_BIT))
+ exc_offset = LOWER_EL_AArch64_VECTOR;
+ else
+ exc_offset = LOWER_EL_AArch32_VECTOR;
+
+ return exc_offset + type;
+}
+
/*
- * This performs the exception entry at a given EL (@target_mode), stashing PC
- * and PSTATE into ELR and SPSR respectively, and compute the new PC/PSTATE.
- * The EL passed to this function *must* be a non-secure, privileged mode with
- * bit 0 being set (PSTATE.SP == 1).
- *
* When an exception is taken, most PSTATE fields are left unchanged in the
* handler. However, some are explicitly overridden (e.g. M[4:0]). Luckily all
* of the inherited bits have the same position in the AArch64/AArch32 SPSR_ELx
@@ -82,50 +95,17 @@ static void __vcpu_write_spsr_und(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
* Here we manipulate the fields in order of the AArch64 SPSR_ELx layout, from
* MSB to LSB.
*/
-static void enter_exception64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long target_mode,
- enum exception_type type)
+unsigned long get_except64_cpsr(unsigned long old, bool has_mte,
+ unsigned long sctlr, unsigned long target_mode)
{
- unsigned long sctlr, vbar, old, new, mode;
- u64 exc_offset;
-
- mode = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) & (PSR_MODE_MASK | PSR_MODE32_BIT);
-
- if (mode == target_mode)
- exc_offset = CURRENT_EL_SP_ELx_VECTOR;
- else if ((mode | PSR_MODE_THREAD_BIT) == target_mode)
- exc_offset = CURRENT_EL_SP_EL0_VECTOR;
- else if (!(mode & PSR_MODE32_BIT))
- exc_offset = LOWER_EL_AArch64_VECTOR;
- else
- exc_offset = LOWER_EL_AArch32_VECTOR;
-
- switch (target_mode) {
- case PSR_MODE_EL1h:
- vbar = __vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, VBAR_EL1);
- sctlr = __vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL1);
- __vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, *vcpu_pc(vcpu), ELR_EL1);
- break;
- case PSR_MODE_EL2h:
- vbar = __vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, VBAR_EL2);
- sctlr = __vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL2);
- __vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, *vcpu_pc(vcpu), ELR_EL2);
- break;
- default:
- /* Don't do that */
- BUG();
- }
-
- *vcpu_pc(vcpu) = vbar + exc_offset + type;
-
- old = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu);
- new = 0;
+ u64 new = 0;
new |= (old & PSR_N_BIT);
new |= (old & PSR_Z_BIT);
new |= (old & PSR_C_BIT);
new |= (old & PSR_V_BIT);
- if (kvm_has_mte(kern_hyp_va(vcpu->kvm)))
+ if (has_mte)
new |= PSR_TCO_BIT;
new |= (old & PSR_DIT_BIT);
@@ -161,6 +141,42 @@ static void enter_exception64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long target_mode,
new |= target_mode;
+ return new;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This performs the exception entry at a given EL (@target_mode), stashing PC
+ * and PSTATE into ELR and SPSR respectively, and compute the new PC/PSTATE.
+ * The EL passed to this function *must* be a non-secure, privileged mode with
+ * bit 0 being set (PSTATE.SP == 1).
+ */
+static void enter_exception64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long target_mode,
+ enum exception_type type)
+{
+ u64 offset = get_except64_offset(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu), target_mode, type);
+ unsigned long sctlr, vbar, old, new;
+
+ switch (target_mode) {
+ case PSR_MODE_EL1h:
+ vbar = __vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, VBAR_EL1);
+ sctlr = __vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL1);
+ __vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, *vcpu_pc(vcpu), ELR_EL1);
+ break;
+ case PSR_MODE_EL2h:
+ vbar = __vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, VBAR_EL2);
+ sctlr = __vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL2);
+ __vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, *vcpu_pc(vcpu), ELR_EL2);
+ break;
+ default:
+ /* Don't do that */
+ BUG();
+ }
+
+ *vcpu_pc(vcpu) = vbar + offset;
+
+ old = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu);
+ new = get_except64_cpsr(old, kvm_has_mte(kern_hyp_va(vcpu->kvm)), sctlr,
+ target_mode);
*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = new;
__vcpu_write_spsr(vcpu, target_mode, old);
}
--
2.52.0.351.gbe84eed79e-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-05 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-05 15:49 [PATCH 00/30] KVM: arm64: Add support for protected guest memory with pKVM Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 01/30] KVM: arm64: Invert KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HANDLE_FAULT to fix pKVM walkers Will Deacon
2026-01-06 14:33 ` Quentin Perret
2026-01-10 10:22 ` (subset) " Oliver Upton
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 02/30] KVM: arm64: Remove redundant 'pgt' pointer checks from MMU notifiers Will Deacon
2026-01-06 14:32 ` Quentin Perret
2026-01-09 14:31 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-09 17:31 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 03/30] KVM: arm64: Rename __pkvm_pgtable_stage2_unmap() Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 04/30] KVM: arm64: Don't advertise unsupported features for protected guests Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 05/30] KVM: arm64: Expose self-hosted debug regs as RAZ/WI " Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 06/30] KVM: arm64: Remove pointless is_protected_kvm_enabled() checks from hyp Will Deacon
2026-01-06 14:40 ` Quentin Perret
2026-01-09 14:23 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 07/30] KVM: arm64: Ignore MMU notifier callbacks for protected VMs Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 08/30] KVM: arm64: Prevent unsupported memslot operations on " Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 09/30] KVM: arm64: Split teardown hypercall into two phases Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 10/30] KVM: arm64: Introduce __pkvm_host_donate_guest() Will Deacon
2026-01-06 14:48 ` Quentin Perret
2026-01-09 14:30 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-09 15:10 ` Quentin Perret
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 11/30] KVM: arm64: Hook up donation hypercall to pkvm_pgtable_stage2_map() Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 12/30] KVM: arm64: Handle aborts from protected VMs Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 13/30] KVM: arm64: Introduce __pkvm_reclaim_dying_guest_page() Will Deacon
2026-01-06 16:26 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 14/30] KVM: arm64: Hook up reclaim hypercall to pkvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy() Will Deacon
2026-01-06 14:59 ` Quentin Perret
2026-01-09 14:35 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-09 14:57 ` Quentin Perret
2026-01-05 15:49 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 16/30] KVM: arm64: Inject SIGSEGV on illegal accesses Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 17/30] KVM: arm64: Generalise kvm_pgtable_stage2_set_owner() Will Deacon
2026-01-06 15:20 ` Quentin Perret
2026-01-09 18:46 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-17 0:03 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 18/30] KVM: arm64: Introduce host_stage2_set_owner_metadata_locked() Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 19/30] KVM: arm64: Annotate guest donations with handle and gfn in host stage-2 Will Deacon
2026-01-06 16:01 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-01-09 14:42 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-12 9:25 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 20/30] KVM: arm64: Introduce hypercall to force reclaim of a protected page Will Deacon
2026-01-06 15:44 ` Quentin Perret
2026-01-09 17:47 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 21/30] KVM: arm64: Reclaim faulting page from pKVM in spurious fault handler Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 22/30] KVM: arm64: Return -EFAULT from VCPU_RUN on access to a poisoned pte Will Deacon
2026-01-06 15:54 ` Quentin Perret
2026-01-09 14:57 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-09 15:29 ` Quentin Perret
2026-01-09 17:35 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 23/30] KVM: arm64: Add hvc handler at EL2 for hypercalls from protected VMs Will Deacon
2026-01-06 15:52 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 24/30] KVM: arm64: Implement the MEM_SHARE hypercall for " Will Deacon
2026-01-06 15:45 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-01-09 15:01 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 25/30] KVM: arm64: Implement the MEM_UNSHARE " Will Deacon
2026-01-06 15:50 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 26/30] KVM: arm64: Allow userspace to create protected VMs when pKVM is enabled Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 27/30] KVM: arm64: Add some initial documentation for pKVM Will Deacon
2026-01-06 15:59 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-01-09 15:04 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 28/30] KVM: arm64: Extend pKVM page ownership selftests to cover guest donation Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 29/30] KVM: arm64: Register 'selftest_vm' in the VM table Will Deacon
2026-01-05 15:49 ` [PATCH 30/30] KVM: arm64: Extend pKVM page ownership selftests to cover forced reclaim Will Deacon
2026-03-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 00/30] KVM: arm64: Add support for protected guest memory with pKVM Mostafa Saleh
2026-04-20 8:02 ` Pavan Kondeti
2026-04-20 10:00 ` Will Deacon
2026-04-20 11:26 ` Pavan Kondeti
2026-04-21 4:15 ` Pavan Kondeti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260105154939.11041-16-will@kernel.org \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.