All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stanley Zhang <stazhang@purestorage.com>,
	Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 08/19] ublk: move offset check out of __ublk_check_and_get_req()
Date: Mon,  5 Jan 2026 17:57:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260106005752.3784925-9-csander@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260106005752.3784925-1-csander@purestorage.com>

__ublk_check_and_get_req() checks that the passed in offset is within
the data length of the specified ublk request. However, only user copy
(ublk_check_and_get_req()) supports accessing ublk request data at a
nonzero offset. Zero-copy buffer registration (ublk_register_io_buf())
always passes 0 for the offset, so the check is unnecessary. Move the
check from __ublk_check_and_get_req() to ublk_check_and_get_req().

Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index abb668b460a8..e44ab9981ef4 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -253,11 +253,11 @@ struct ublk_params_header {
 
 static void ublk_io_release(void *priv);
 static void ublk_stop_dev_unlocked(struct ublk_device *ub);
 static void ublk_abort_queue(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq);
 static inline struct request *__ublk_check_and_get_req(struct ublk_device *ub,
-		u16 q_id, u16 tag, struct ublk_io *io, size_t offset);
+		u16 q_id, u16 tag, struct ublk_io *io);
 static inline unsigned int ublk_req_build_flags(struct request *req);
 
 static void ublk_partition_scan_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct ublk_device *ub =
@@ -2283,11 +2283,11 @@ static int ublk_register_io_buf(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!ublk_dev_support_zero_copy(ub))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	req = __ublk_check_and_get_req(ub, q_id, tag, io, 0);
+	req = __ublk_check_and_get_req(ub, q_id, tag, io);
 	if (!req)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	ret = io_buffer_register_bvec(cmd, req, ublk_io_release, index,
 				      issue_flags);
@@ -2577,11 +2577,11 @@ static int ublk_ch_uring_cmd_local(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 			__func__, cmd_op, tag, ret, io ? io->flags : 0);
 	return ret;
 }
 
 static inline struct request *__ublk_check_and_get_req(struct ublk_device *ub,
-		u16 q_id, u16 tag, struct ublk_io *io, size_t offset)
+		u16 q_id, u16 tag, struct ublk_io *io)
 {
 	struct request *req;
 
 	/*
 	 * can't use io->req in case of concurrent UBLK_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ,
@@ -2598,13 +2598,10 @@ static inline struct request *__ublk_check_and_get_req(struct ublk_device *ub,
 		goto fail_put;
 
 	if (!ublk_rq_has_data(req))
 		goto fail_put;
 
-	if (offset > blk_rq_bytes(req))
-		goto fail_put;
-
 	return req;
 fail_put:
 	ublk_put_req_ref(io, req);
 	return NULL;
 }
@@ -2682,14 +2679,19 @@ ublk_user_copy(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, int dir)
 
 	if (tag >= ub->dev_info.queue_depth)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	io = &ubq->ios[tag];
-	req = __ublk_check_and_get_req(ub, q_id, tag, io, buf_off);
+	req = __ublk_check_and_get_req(ub, q_id, tag, io);
 	if (!req)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (buf_off > blk_rq_bytes(req)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	if (!ublk_check_ubuf_dir(req, dir)) {
 		ret = -EACCES;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-06  0:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-06  0:57 [PATCH v3 00/19] ublk: add support for integrity data Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 01/19] blk-integrity: take const pointer in blk_integrity_rq() Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 02/19] ublk: move ublk flag check functions earlier Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 03/19] ublk: support UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_INTEGRITY in device creation Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06 13:09   ` Ming Lei
2026-01-06 16:32     ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-07  0:15       ` Ming Lei
2026-01-07  2:20         ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 04/19] ublk: set UBLK_IO_F_INTEGRITY in ublksrv_io_desc Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 05/19] ublk: add ublk_copy_user_bvec() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06 13:14   ` Ming Lei
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 06/19] ublk: split out ublk_user_copy() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 07/19] ublk: inline ublk_check_and_get_req() into ublk_user_copy() Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06  0:57 ` Caleb Sander Mateos [this message]
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 09/19] ublk: implement integrity user copy Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06 13:34   ` Ming Lei
2026-01-06 18:20     ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-07  0:28       ` Ming Lei
2026-01-08  1:50         ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-08  2:11           ` Ming Lei
2026-01-06 13:46   ` Ming Lei
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 10/19] ublk: support UBLK_F_INTEGRITY Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06 13:36   ` Ming Lei
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 11/19] ublk: optimize ublk_user_copy() on daemon task Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 12/19] selftests: ublk: display UBLK_F_INTEGRITY support Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06 13:38   ` Ming Lei
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 13/19] selftests: ublk: add utility to get block device metadata size Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06 13:50   ` Ming Lei
2026-01-06 17:18     ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 14/19] selftests: ublk: add kublk support for integrity params Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 15/19] selftests: ublk: implement integrity user copy in kublk Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 16/19] selftests: ublk: support non-O_DIRECT backing files Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 17/19] selftests: ublk: add integrity data support to loop target Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 18/19] selftests: ublk: add integrity params test Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v3 19/19] selftests: ublk: add end-to-end integrity test Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06 14:10   ` Ming Lei
2026-01-06 17:15     ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-07  0:21       ` Ming Lei
2026-01-07  1:32         ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-07  1:49           ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260106005752.3784925-9-csander@purestorage.com \
    --to=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=stazhang@purestorage.com \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.