All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>,
	Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>,
	Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
	Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>, Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>,
	dxu@dxuuu.xyz, deso@posteo.net, Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v13 6/7] libbpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu maps
Date: Wed,  7 Jan 2026 10:20:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260107022022.12843-7-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260107022022.12843-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>

Add libbpf support for the BPF_F_CPU flag for percpu maps by embedding the
cpu info into the high 32 bits of:

1. **flags**: bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(), bpf_map__lookup_elem(),
   bpf_map_update_elem() and bpf_map__update_elem()
2. **opts->elem_flags**: bpf_map_lookup_batch() and
   bpf_map_update_batch()

And the flag can be BPF_F_ALL_CPUS, but cannot be
'BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS'.

Behavior:

* If the flag is BPF_F_ALL_CPUS, the update is applied across all CPUs.
* If the flag is BPF_F_CPU, it updates value only to the specified CPU.
* If the flag is BPF_F_CPU, lookup value only from the specified CPU.
* lookup does not support BPF_F_ALL_CPUS.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h    |  8 ++++++++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 21 ++++++++-------------
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
index 1f9c28d27795..2c8e88ddb674 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
@@ -289,6 +289,14 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(int fd, void *in_batch,
  *    Update spin_lock-ed map elements. This must be
  *    specified if the map value contains a spinlock.
  *
+ * **BPF_F_CPU**
+ *    As for percpu maps, update value on the specified CPU. And the cpu
+ *    info is embedded into the high 32 bits of **opts->elem_flags**.
+ *
+ * **BPF_F_ALL_CPUS**
+ *    As for percpu maps, update value across all CPUs. This flag cannot
+ *    be used with BPF_F_CPU at the same time.
+ *
  * @param fd BPF map file descriptor
  * @param keys pointer to an array of *count* keys
  * @param values pointer to an array of *count* values
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 1a52d818a76c..6ea81701e274 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -10919,7 +10919,7 @@ bpf_object__find_map_fd_by_name(const struct bpf_object *obj, const char *name)
 }
 
 static int validate_map_op(const struct bpf_map *map, size_t key_sz,
-			   size_t value_sz, bool check_value_sz)
+			   size_t value_sz, bool check_value_sz, __u64 flags)
 {
 	if (!map_is_created(map)) /* map is not yet created */
 		return -ENOENT;
@@ -10946,6 +10946,20 @@ static int validate_map_op(const struct bpf_map *map, size_t key_sz,
 		int num_cpu = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
 		size_t elem_sz = roundup(map->def.value_size, 8);
 
+		if (flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) {
+			if ((flags & BPF_F_CPU) && (flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) {
+				pr_warn("map '%s': BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS are mutually exclusive\n",
+					map->name);
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+			if (map->def.value_size != value_sz) {
+				pr_warn("map '%s': unexpected value size %zu provided for either BPF_F_CPU or BPF_F_ALL_CPUS, expected %u\n",
+					map->name, value_sz, map->def.value_size);
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+			break;
+		}
+
 		if (value_sz != num_cpu * elem_sz) {
 			pr_warn("map '%s': unexpected value size %zu provided for per-CPU map, expected %d * %zu = %zd\n",
 				map->name, value_sz, num_cpu, elem_sz, num_cpu * elem_sz);
@@ -10970,7 +10984,7 @@ int bpf_map__lookup_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true);
+	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true, flags);
 	if (err)
 		return libbpf_err(err);
 
@@ -10983,7 +10997,7 @@ int bpf_map__update_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true);
+	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true, flags);
 	if (err)
 		return libbpf_err(err);
 
@@ -10995,7 +11009,7 @@ int bpf_map__delete_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, 0, false /* check_value_sz */);
+	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, 0, false /* check_value_sz */, flags);
 	if (err)
 		return libbpf_err(err);
 
@@ -11008,7 +11022,7 @@ int bpf_map__lookup_and_delete_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true);
+	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true, flags);
 	if (err)
 		return libbpf_err(err);
 
@@ -11020,7 +11034,7 @@ int bpf_map__get_next_key(const struct bpf_map *map,
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, 0, false /* check_value_sz */);
+	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, 0, false /* check_value_sz */, 0);
 	if (err)
 		return libbpf_err(err);
 
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index e14d9e349f9c..dfc37a615578 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -1216,12 +1216,13 @@ LIBBPF_API struct bpf_map *bpf_map__inner_map(struct bpf_map *map);
  * @param key_sz size in bytes of key data, needs to match BPF map definition's **key_size**
  * @param value pointer to memory in which looked up value will be stored
  * @param value_sz size in byte of value data memory; it has to match BPF map
- * definition's **value_size**. For per-CPU BPF maps value size has to be
- * a product of BPF map value size and number of possible CPUs in the system
- * (could be fetched with **libbpf_num_possible_cpus()**). Note also that for
- * per-CPU values value size has to be aligned up to closest 8 bytes for
- * alignment reasons, so expected size is: `round_up(value_size, 8)
- * * libbpf_num_possible_cpus()`.
+ * definition's **value_size**. For per-CPU BPF maps, value size can be
+ * `value_size` if either **BPF_F_CPU** or **BPF_F_ALL_CPUS** is specified
+ * in **flags**, otherwise a product of BPF map value size and number of
+ * possible CPUs in the system (could be fetched with
+ * **libbpf_num_possible_cpus()**). Note also that for per-CPU values value
+ * size has to be aligned up to closest 8 bytes, so expected size is:
+ * `round_up(value_size, 8) * libbpf_num_possible_cpus()`.
  * @param flags extra flags passed to kernel for this operation
  * @return 0, on success; negative error, otherwise
  *
@@ -1239,13 +1240,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__lookup_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
  * @param key pointer to memory containing bytes of the key
  * @param key_sz size in bytes of key data, needs to match BPF map definition's **key_size**
  * @param value pointer to memory containing bytes of the value
- * @param value_sz size in byte of value data memory; it has to match BPF map
- * definition's **value_size**. For per-CPU BPF maps value size has to be
- * a product of BPF map value size and number of possible CPUs in the system
- * (could be fetched with **libbpf_num_possible_cpus()**). Note also that for
- * per-CPU values value size has to be aligned up to closest 8 bytes for
- * alignment reasons, so expected size is: `round_up(value_size, 8)
- * * libbpf_num_possible_cpus()`.
+ * @param value_sz refer to **bpf_map__lookup_elem**'s description.'
  * @param flags extra flags passed to kernel for this operation
  * @return 0, on success; negative error, otherwise
  *
-- 
2.52.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-07  2:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-07  2:20 [PATCH bpf-next v13 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2026-01-07  2:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 1/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
2026-01-07  2:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 2/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps Leon Hwang
2026-01-07  2:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 3/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps Leon Hwang
2026-01-07  2:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 4/7] bpf: Copy map value using copy_map_value_long for percpu_cgroup_storage maps Leon Hwang
2026-01-07  2:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support " Leon Hwang
2026-01-07  2:20 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-01-07  2:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
2026-01-07  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260107022022.12843-7-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chen.dylane@linux.dev \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=deso@posteo.net \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=rongtao@cestc.cn \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tklauser@distanz.ch \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.