From: "Sheetal ." <sheetal@nvidia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Mohan kumar <mkumard@nvidia.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-sound@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
Sheetal <sheetal@nvidia.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] regmap: Add KUnit test for flat_cache_default_is_zero
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:58:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260112042841.51799-3-sheetal@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260112042841.51799-1-sheetal@nvidia.com>
From: Sheetal <sheetal@nvidia.com>
Add KUnit test coverage for the flat_cache_default_is_zero flag. The
test verifies that when the flag is set:
- Writes in cache_only mode work before registers are marked valid
- Writes in cache_only mode work after registers are marked valid
- After regcache_mark_dirty() and regcache_sync(), cached values
are correctly written to hardware
- Reads return the cached values
Test command:
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run regmap
Test results:
============= flat_cache_default_is_zero_flag =============
[PASSED] flat-default @0x0
[PASSED] flat-default fast I/O @0x0
[PASSED] flat-default @0x2001
[PASSED] flat-default @0x2002
========= [PASSED] flat_cache_default_is_zero_flag =========
Signed-off-by: Sheetal <sheetal@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
index f6fc5ed016da..7eec555c449c 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
@@ -118,6 +118,15 @@ static const struct regmap_test_param real_cache_types_only_list[] = {
KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(real_cache_types_only, real_cache_types_only_list, param_to_desc);
+static const struct regmap_test_param flat_cache_types_list[] = {
+ { .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0 },
+ { .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0, .fast_io = true },
+ { .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0x2001 },
+ { .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0x2002 },
+};
+
+KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(flat_cache_types, flat_cache_types_list, param_to_desc);
+
static const struct regmap_test_param real_cache_types_list[] = {
{ .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0 },
{ .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0, .fast_io = true },
@@ -1517,6 +1526,83 @@ static void cache_present(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, regcache_reg_cached(map, param->from_reg + i));
}
+/*
+ * Test flat_cache_default_is_zero flag behavior.
+ *
+ * When this flag is set on REGCACHE_FLAT, registers not in reg_defaults
+ * are treated as having a default value of zero. This allows drivers to
+ * avoid maintaining large reg_defaults arrays for hardware with zero
+ * power-on-reset values.
+ */
+static void flat_cache_default_is_zero_flag(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ const struct regmap_test_param *param = test->param_value;
+ struct regmap *map;
+ struct regmap_config config;
+ struct regmap_ram_data *data;
+ unsigned int val;
+ int i;
+
+ config = test_regmap_config;
+ config.flat_cache_default_is_zero = true;
+
+ map = gen_regmap(test, &config, &data);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(map));
+ if (IS_ERR(map))
+ return;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++) {
+ data->read[param->from_reg + i] = false;
+ data->written[param->from_reg + i] = false;
+ }
+
+ /* Write in cache_only mode before registers are marked valid */
+ regcache_cache_only(map, true);
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_write(map, param->from_reg + i, i + 0x100));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ regcache_cache_only(map, false);
+ regcache_mark_dirty(map);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regcache_sync(map));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i + 0x100, data->vals[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ /* Verify reads return cached values */
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++) {
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_read(map, param->from_reg + i, &val));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i + 0x100, val);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ data->written[param->from_reg + i] = false;
+
+ /* Write in cache_only mode after registers are already valid */
+ regcache_cache_only(map, true);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_write(map, param->from_reg + i, i + 0x200));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ regcache_cache_only(map, false);
+ regcache_mark_dirty(map);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regcache_sync(map));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i + 0x200, data->vals[param->from_reg + i]);
+}
+
static void cache_write_zero(struct kunit *test)
{
const struct regmap_test_param *param = test->param_value;
@@ -2078,6 +2164,7 @@ static struct kunit_case regmap_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_present, sparse_cache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_write_zero, sparse_cache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_range_window_reg, real_cache_types_only_gen_params),
+ KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(flat_cache_default_is_zero_flag, flat_cache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(raw_read_defaults_single, raw_test_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(raw_read_defaults, raw_test_types_gen_params),
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-12 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-12 4:28 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] regmap: Add flat_cache_default_is_zero flag for flat cache Sheetal .
2026-01-12 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] " Sheetal .
2026-01-12 19:09 ` Sander Vanheule
2026-01-12 21:45 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-12 4:28 ` Sheetal . [this message]
2026-01-12 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] ASoC: tegra: Enable flat_cache_default_is_zero for audio drivers Sheetal .
2026-01-12 12:26 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-12 12:53 ` Sheetal .
2026-01-12 13:32 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260112042841.51799-3-sheetal@nvidia.com \
--to=sheetal@nvidia.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkumard@nvidia.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sander@svanheule.net \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.