From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, williams@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix server stopping with runnable tasks
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 10:48:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260113094843.GU830755@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9366bb54fa7529e79608b56a394d375789d28aa5.camel@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 10:42:02AM +0100, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> On Tue, 2026-01-13 at 10:37 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > static void update_curr_dl_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
> > > s64 delta_exec)
> > > {
> > > - bool idle = rq->curr == rq->idle;
> > > + bool idle = rq->curr == rq->idle && !rq->nr_running && !rq-
> > > >ttwu_pending;
> >
> > This is idle_cpu(), perhaps we can lift that thing into sched.h or so.
> >
>
> Yeah, that's what I meant by quick and dirty.. I have idle_cpu() on the model
> side (and have them matching simplifies a lot of things).
>
> I just wasn't sure if we wanted a function call in there. But we can probably do
> something nicer without it too.
I'm test building this...
---
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index bf96a7d595e2..524bdc0ca53f 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1869,7 +1869,6 @@ static inline int task_nice(const struct task_struct *p)
extern int can_nice(const struct task_struct *p, const int nice);
extern int task_curr(const struct task_struct *p);
extern int idle_cpu(int cpu);
-extern int available_idle_cpu(int cpu);
extern int sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *, int, const struct sched_param *);
extern int sched_setscheduler_nocheck(struct task_struct *, int, const struct sched_param *);
extern void sched_set_fifo(struct task_struct *p);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 80c9559a3e30..d06b29ae961e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@ update_stats_dequeue_dl(struct dl_rq *dl_rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, int
static void update_curr_dl_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64 delta_exec)
{
- bool idle = rq->curr == rq->idle;
+ bool idle = idle_rq(rq);
s64 scaled_delta_exec;
if (unlikely(delta_exec <= 0)) {
@@ -1603,8 +1603,8 @@ void dl_server_update(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64 delta_exec)
* | 8 | B:zero_laxity-wait | | |
* | | | <---+ |
* | +--------------------------------+ |
- * | | ^ ^ 2 |
- * | | 7 | 2 +--------------------+
+ * | | ^ ^ 2 |
+ * | | 7 | 2, 1 +----------------+
* | v |
* | +-------------+ |
* +-- | C:idle-wait | -+
@@ -1649,8 +1649,11 @@ void dl_server_update(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64 delta_exec)
* dl_defer_idle = 0
*
*
- * [1] A->B, A->D
+ * [1] A->B, A->D, C->B
* dl_server_start()
+ * dl_defer_idle = 0;
+ * if (dl_server_active)
+ * return; // [B]
* dl_server_active = 1;
* enqueue_dl_entity()
* update_dl_entity(WAKEUP)
@@ -1784,6 +1787,7 @@ void dl_server_start(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
{
struct rq *rq = dl_se->rq;
+ dl_se->dl_defer_idle = 0;
if (!dl_server(dl_se) || dl_se->dl_server_active)
return;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 58c9d244f12b..ea791550af0e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1380,6 +1380,28 @@ static inline u32 sched_rng(void)
#define cpu_curr(cpu) (cpu_rq(cpu)->curr)
#define raw_rq() raw_cpu_ptr(&runqueues)
+static inline bool idle_rq(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ return rq->curr == rq->idle && !rq->nr_running && !rq->ttwu_pending;
+}
+
+/**
+ * available_idle_cpu - is a given CPU idle for enqueuing work.
+ * @cpu: the CPU in question.
+ *
+ * Return: 1 if the CPU is currently idle. 0 otherwise.
+ */
+static inline bool available_idle_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ if (!idle_rq(cpu_rq(cpu)))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (vcpu_is_preempted(cpu))
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
static inline void rq_set_donor(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *t)
{
diff --git a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
index 0496dc29ed0f..cb337de679b8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
@@ -180,35 +180,7 @@ int task_prio(const struct task_struct *p)
*/
int idle_cpu(int cpu)
{
- struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
-
- if (rq->curr != rq->idle)
- return 0;
-
- if (rq->nr_running)
- return 0;
-
- if (rq->ttwu_pending)
- return 0;
-
- return 1;
-}
-
-/**
- * available_idle_cpu - is a given CPU idle for enqueuing work.
- * @cpu: the CPU in question.
- *
- * Return: 1 if the CPU is currently idle. 0 otherwise.
- */
-int available_idle_cpu(int cpu)
-{
- if (!idle_cpu(cpu))
- return 0;
-
- if (vcpu_is_preempted(cpu))
- return 0;
-
- return 1;
+ return idle_rq(cpu_rq(cpu));
}
/**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-13 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-12 9:02 sched/deadline: Server stops while fair tasks are still runnable Gabriele Monaco
2026-01-12 14:45 ` Juri Lelli
2026-01-13 8:52 ` [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix server stopping with runnable tasks Gabriele Monaco
2026-01-13 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-13 9:42 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-01-13 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-01-13 9:50 ` Juri Lelli
2026-01-13 10:43 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Gabriele Monaco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260113094843.GU830755@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.