From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Shaiq Wani <shaiq.wani@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, aman.deep.singh@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx/Tx
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 10:13:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260113101355.7a482dfc@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260105062257.102370-1-shaiq.wani@intel.com>
On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 11:52:54 +0530
Shaiq Wani <shaiq.wani@intel.com> wrote:
> In case some CPUs don't support AVX512. Enable AVX2 for them to
> get better per-core performance.
>
> In the single queue model, the same descriptor queue is used by SW
> to post descriptors to the device and used by device to report completed
> descriptors to SW. While as the split queue model separates them into
> different queues for parallel processing and improved performance.
>
> v11:
> *Fixed indentation issues.
>
> v10:
> *Changed desc reading style in Rx path.
>
> v9:
> *Some minor fixes.
>
> v8:
> *Reworked the receive func to avoid race conditions in Rx path.
> *Removed unnecessary compiler barriers.
>
> v7:
> *Removed (char) casts, ifdef block as suggested.
> *Fixed indentation, line wrapping.
> *Did blind write of data to avoid branching.
> *changed desc building and writing order for Tx.
>
> v6:
> *used single load/store in splitq_recv_pkts function.
> *removed x86-specific intrinsics from common code.
>
> v5:
> *Fixed CI errors.
> *Used defined constants instead of numbers.
>
> v4:
> *moved splitq_rearm_common to a common location.
> *reduced duplication of code.
> *fixed splitq_recv_pkts function.
>
> v3:
> *Fixed some indentation issues.
> *Collapsed wrapper and core function into one.
> *Fixed some pointer casting and naming inconsistency issues.
>
> v2:
> *Fixed CI build related issues.
> *Rebased on top of idpf/cpfl rx path selection simplication patch.
>
>
>
> Shaiq Wani (3):
> net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx
> net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Tx
> doc: note on unsupported completion queue sharing
>
> doc/guides/nics/idpf.rst | 5 +
> drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx.c | 59 ++++
> drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx.h | 8 +
> .../net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx_avx2.c | 317 +++++++++++++++++-
> .../net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx_avx512.c | 56 ----
> drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_rxtx.c | 9 +
> 7 files changed, 397 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
Thanks for sticking with this patchset.
It is worth noting that AI had some review comments.
Summary
Errors (Must Fix)
None critical.
Warnings (Should Fix)
Patch 1 & 2: Commit body text is identical and doesn't specifically describe the Tx patch. Consider making the body patch-specific.
Patch 1: "While as" grammatical error in commit body → "Whereas" or "While".
Patch 2: Contains unrelated style change (moving tx_id declaration). Should be mentioned in commit message or separated.
Patch 2: Verify IDPD_TXQ_SCAN_CQ_THRESH spelling—appears it might be a typo for IDPF_.
Patch 1 & 2: Inconsistent placement of RTE_EXPORT_INTERNAL_SYMBOL() (before vs. after function).
Patch 3: "Added" is past tense; imperative "Add" is preferred.
Info (Consider)
The series is at v11, indicating significant iteration. The core implementation looks reasonable for AVX2 vectorized packet processing.
Mid-block variable declarations are used inconsistently—some at function top, some mid-block. Consider consistent placement.
Unnecessary initialization of received = 0 since it's always assigned before use.
Recommendation
Acceptable with minor revisions. The code appears functionally correct for enabling AVX2 split queue support. Address the warnings above, particularly:
Fix the "IDPD" vs "IDPF" typo if confirmed
Update commit messages to be patch-specific
Consider separating unrelated style changes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-13 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-17 5:26 [PATCH 0/2] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx/Tx Shaiq Wani
2025-09-17 5:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Tx Shaiq Wani
2025-09-17 5:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx Shaiq Wani
2025-09-17 9:51 ` [PATCH 0/2] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx/Tx Bruce Richardson
2025-10-17 10:34 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] " Shaiq Wani
2025-10-17 10:34 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx Shaiq Wani
2025-10-17 10:34 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Tx Shaiq Wani
2025-10-17 10:34 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] doc: note on unsupported completion queue sharing Shaiq Wani
2025-10-27 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx/Tx Shaiq Wani
2025-10-27 8:07 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx Shaiq Wani
2025-10-27 8:07 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Tx Shaiq Wani
2025-10-27 8:07 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] doc: note on unsupported completion queue sharing Shaiq Wani
2025-10-28 5:29 ` [PATCH v9 0/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx/Tx Shaiq Wani
2025-10-28 5:29 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx Shaiq Wani
2025-10-28 5:29 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Tx Shaiq Wani
2025-10-28 5:29 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] doc: note on unsupported completion queue sharing Shaiq Wani
2025-10-28 14:21 ` [PATCH v9 0/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx/Tx Shaiq Wani
2025-10-28 14:22 ` [PATCH v10 1/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx Shaiq Wani
2025-12-11 12:53 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-10-28 14:22 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Tx Shaiq Wani
2025-10-28 14:22 ` [PATCH v10 3/3] doc: note on unsupported completion queue sharing Shaiq Wani
2025-12-11 13:00 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-01-05 6:22 ` [PATCH v11 0/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx/Tx Shaiq Wani
2026-01-05 6:22 ` [PATCH v11 1/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx Shaiq Wani
2026-01-05 6:22 ` [PATCH v11 2/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Tx Shaiq Wani
2026-01-05 6:22 ` [PATCH v11 3/3] doc: note on unsupported completion queue sharing Shaiq Wani
2026-01-13 18:13 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-01-26 17:14 ` [PATCH v11 0/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx/Tx Bruce Richardson
2026-02-24 7:47 ` [PATCH v12 " Shaiq Wani
2026-02-24 7:47 ` [PATCH v12 1/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx Shaiq Wani
2026-02-24 14:27 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-02-24 7:47 ` [PATCH v12 2/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Tx Shaiq Wani
2026-02-24 7:47 ` [PATCH v12 3/3] doc: add note on unsupported completion queue sharing Shaiq Wani
2026-02-26 6:52 ` [PATCH v13 0/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx/Tx Shaiq Wani
2026-02-26 6:52 ` [PATCH v13 1/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx Shaiq Wani
2026-02-26 6:52 ` [PATCH v13 2/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Tx Shaiq Wani
2026-02-26 6:52 ` [PATCH v13 3/3] doc: add note on unsupported completion queue sharing Shaiq Wani
2026-02-26 9:42 ` [PATCH v14 0/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx/Tx Shaiq Wani
2026-02-26 9:42 ` [PATCH v14 1/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx Shaiq Wani
2026-02-26 9:42 ` [PATCH v14 2/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Tx Shaiq Wani
2026-02-26 9:42 ` [PATCH v14 3/3] doc: add note on unsupported completion queue sharing Shaiq Wani
2026-02-26 11:31 ` [PATCH v14 0/3] net/idpf: enable AVX2 for split queue Rx/Tx Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260113101355.7a482dfc@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=shaiq.wani@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.