From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E544272E63 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 10:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768300430; cv=none; b=ongI9G9h1gG3fDSejT+i+mTHsemcgxA+Bg762/emuzU51NCSR6oJsPhQ9z9RvgP5Bbv29XXktpUYfkV9ADsIDWGFdHu2KyHPubALBmHAajhV67ANxHdaxL3V82ncJGFOW/Kwvt1eLt7yS+esn+gD+sbNvodgOscfmDq0M+2pFEs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768300430; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZuxRB4qIBEWBeE9gcyA0zG+WQ5RS5xK+Q0EI9I9kg2U=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=sxqcwMurTfHXr4P892Hl6s+V2NSae+FDN93aeNGv2V5fv9/963Q0UludKahm6iGYB5PO8iaX6klH8GYVx6CEjH8ELN2Rp+A2Mg66vEXEwpLx0qwJr8KUvEO6/a9SnDdoQyYzF+LvEHBe63B7EGB17cQpFpQYMW4z6OVDojqDHlY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=D5PxYe1k; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="D5PxYe1k" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1768300430; x=1799836430; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=ZuxRB4qIBEWBeE9gcyA0zG+WQ5RS5xK+Q0EI9I9kg2U=; b=D5PxYe1kloWuWJdqQyN4sMyDKgwZa8soAqhxKglIu0Pjj52sNRmtT7/F BsEHYS6L5jf4rRrpwFG9VDfiODgc2rexf4pRvPv/C7is96GEhSNIcUMAS olwMsVGJJgJOogSL6LzVZ7Ch4FIhgAUDH/m5+9Nc24wBic22VY/w2F6PN qWIBvVxJV2ToKgnRgaaoRidhWRzueFmyW8NzUltnoJ33JzHxwiUKFSMcW lBGZZfKd8uYq+83mQdJLDUkbjMQCCI8uXA2wE3bFncTjuvI/CQ02B/SLD gVkGMQA111fFBtMZqqwwmST98BNKNRXp/LrGXy1gXR7vFZPEdxNEZO80s w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Rt86dZesRC6eFdHOxJqRUQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: V6Ks4d1KQOyCkNGsn5jCAw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11669"; a="69504585" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,222,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="69504585" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jan 2026 02:33:46 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: YI1jbVRTQb2roAYIB9uw2w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dl1Tttn2R+uwwNi7u5M2TA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,222,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="204436213" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO 8581b2e2a62c) ([10.211.93.152]) by orviesa008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2026 02:33:45 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 8581b2e2a62c with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vfbiZ-0000000017l-0wnE for oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 10:33:43 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:32:49 +0100 From: kernel test robot To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] btrfs: Use percpu refcounting for block groups Message-ID: <202601131155.ulOGAl1n-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline :::::: :::::: Manual check reason: "high confidence checkpatch report" :::::: BCC: lkp@intel.com CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <0102019bb2ff56b7-9302e783-c17d-452d-b6a7-11f773776ae7-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> References: <0102019bb2ff56b7-9302e783-c17d-452d-b6a7-11f773776ae7-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> TO: Martin Raiber TO: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Hi Martin, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on kdave/for-next] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Martin-Raiber/btrfs-Use-percpu-semaphore-for-space-info-groups_sem/20260113-070107 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0102019bb2ff56b7-9302e783-c17d-452d-b6a7-11f773776ae7-000000%40eu-west-1.amazonses.com patch subject: [PATCH 1/7] btrfs: Use percpu refcounting for block groups :::::: branch date: 12 hours ago :::::: commit date: 12 hours ago reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260113/202601131155.ulOGAl1n-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) # many are suggestions rather than must-fix WARNING:BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE: Block comments should align the * on each line #57: FILE: fs/btrfs/block-group.c:166: + /* + * If there was a failure to cleanup a log tree, very likely due WARNING:BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE: Block comments should align the * on each line #72: FILE: fs/btrfs/block-group.c:177: + /* + * A block_group shouldn't be on the discard_list anymore. -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki