All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Wei <wei.huang2@amd.com>,
	Eric.VanTassell@amd.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, wangzhou1@hisilicon.com,
	wanghuiqiang@huawei.com, liuyonglong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: RFC about how to obtain PCIE TPH steer-tag on ARM64 platform
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 13:32:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260116193203.GA959102@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5106e61-adec-4c7f-af64-9782a81a5954@huawei.com>

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 08:21:30AM +0800, fengchengwen wrote:
> On 1/15/2026 1:03 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 11:39:27AM +0800, fengchengwen wrote:
> >> On 1/14/2026 3:07 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:01:31AM +0800, fengchengwen wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> We want to enable PCIE TPH feature on ARM64 platform, but we encounter the
> >>>> following problem:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. The pcie_tph_get_cpu_st() function invokes the ACPI DSM method to
> >>>>    obtain the steer-tag of the CPU. According to the definition of
> >>>>    the DSM method [1], the cpu_uid should be "ACPI processor uid".
> >>>
> >>>> 2. In the current implementation, the ACPI DSM method is invoked
> >>>>    directly using the logical core number, which works on the x86
> >>>>    platform but does not work on the ARM64 platform because the
> >>>>    logical core ID is not the same as the ACPI processor ID when the
> >>>>    PG exists.
> >>>
> >>> PG?
> >>
> >> partial good
> > 
> > I still don't know what "partial good" means :)  Is that something
> > from a spec?
> 
> Because of some issues (like manufacturing variances), certain circuits
> (e.g., some cores) might not work normally. For these cases, we can use
> the part at a reduced specification, which is the PG mentioned here.

Ah, got it :)  If you go this direction, maybe you can expand that
part of the commit log a bit, since I don't think "PG" or "partial
good" is a widely-known term.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-16 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-12  3:01 RFC about how to obtain PCIE TPH steer-tag on ARM64 platform fengchengwen
2026-01-13 19:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-13 22:38   ` Wei Huang
2026-01-14  3:52     ` fengchengwen
2026-01-14 16:36       ` Wei Huang
2026-01-16  0:14         ` fengchengwen
2026-01-14  3:39   ` fengchengwen
2026-01-14 17:03     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-16  0:21       ` fengchengwen
2026-01-16 19:32         ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-01-19  0:17           ` fengchengwen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260116193203.GA959102@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=Eric.VanTassell@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=wanghuiqiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.