From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@redhat.com>
Cc: fsverity@lists.linux.dev, aalbersh@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fsverity: add tracepoints
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 15:33:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260117233310.GB74518@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3wrdpbzuximevxhielsz5kjzwkbdxhk6dhgzwug4dbj6c3r4ek@dvngy452w2jt>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 01:15:02PM +0100, Andrey Albershteyn wrote:
> fs-verity previously had debug printk but it was removed. This patch
> adds trace points to the same places where printk were used (with a
> few additional ones).
They're not the same places. Which is the right choice: the locations
of the old debug messages aren't necessarily the places the tracepoints
should be. But the commit message shouldn't claim otherwise.
> diff --git a/fs/verity/verify.c b/fs/verity/verify.c
> index 86067c8b40..47a66f088f 100644
> --- a/fs/verity/verify.c
> +++ b/fs/verity/verify.c
> @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@
> /* Byte offset of the wanted hash relative to @addr */
> unsigned int hoffset;
> } hblocks[FS_VERITY_MAX_LEVELS];
> +
> + trace_fsverity_verify_data_block(inode, params, data_pos);
> +
> /*
> * The index of the previous level's block within that level; also the
> * index of that block's hash within the current level.
> @@ -214,6 +217,9 @@
> want_hash = _want_hash;
> kunmap_local(haddr);
> put_page(hpage);
> + trace_fsverity_merkle_hit(inode, data_pos, hblock_idx,
> + level,
> + hoffset >> params->log_digestsize);
> goto descend;
> }
> hblocks[level].page = hpage;
> @@ -248,6 +254,9 @@
> want_hash = _want_hash;
> kunmap_local(haddr);
> put_page(hpage);
> + trace_fsverity_verify_merkle_block(inode,
> + hblock_idx << params->log_blocksize,
> + level, hoffset >> params->log_digestsize);
> }
The second argument to trace_fsverity_verify_merkle_block() is wrong.
It's "unsigned long index", but the caller passes a byte position. Note
that byte positions should be u64. Perhaps you intended for it to be
"unsigned long hblock_idx", like trace_fsverity_merkle_hit(), and for
the caller to pass hblock_idx?
Also note that if the hash doesn't match, then
trace_fsverity_verify_merkle_block() isn't called. Perhaps it should be
called before the hash check is done? That's the case for
trace_fsverity_verify_data_block().
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-17 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-12 12:13 [PATCH 0/3] Add traces and file attributes for fs-verity Andrey Albershteyn
2026-01-12 12:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: add FS_XFLAG_VERITY for fs-verity files Andrey Albershteyn
2026-01-12 22:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 10:07 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-01-17 23:15 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-12 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] fsverity: add tracepoints Andrey Albershteyn
2026-01-17 23:33 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-01-17 23:34 ` [PATCH 0/3] Add traces and file attributes for fs-verity Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260117233310.GB74518@quark \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=aalbersh@kernel.org \
--cc=aalbersh@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.