From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Salman Nabi <salman.nabi@arm.com>,
vvidwans@nvidia.com, andre.przywara@arm.com,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
lpieralisi@kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
ardb@kernel.org, chao.gao@intel.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sdonthineni@nvidia.com,
vsethi@nvidia.com, vwadekar@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] firmware: smccc: add support for Live Firmware Activation (LFA)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 05:35:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202601200543.EKFOBfnW-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260119122729.287522-2-salman.nabi@arm.com>
Hi Salman,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.19-rc6 next-20260116]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Salman-Nabi/firmware-smccc-add-support-for-Live-Firmware-Activation-LFA/20260119-203221
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260119122729.287522-2-salman.nabi%40arm.com
patch subject: [PATCH 1/1] firmware: smccc: add support for Live Firmware Activation (LFA)
config: arm-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260120/202601200543.EKFOBfnW-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9b8addffa70cee5b2acc5454712d9cf78ce45710)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260120/202601200543.EKFOBfnW-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601200543.EKFOBfnW-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:179:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
179 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:179:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
179 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
>> drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:184:2: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
184 | arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(®, ®);
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:194:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
194 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:194:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
194 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:198:2: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
198 | arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(®, ®);
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:220:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
220 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:220:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
220 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:234:3: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
234 | arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(®, ®);
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:290:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
290 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:290:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
290 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:318:3: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
318 | arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(®, ®);
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:360:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
360 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:360:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
360 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:368:2: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
368 | arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(®, ®);
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:434:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
434 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:434:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
434 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:443:2: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
443 | arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(®, ®);
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:586:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
586 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:586:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
586 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:600:3: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
600 | arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(®, ®);
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:619:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
619 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:619:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
619 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
| ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c:623:2: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_invoke'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
623 | arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(®, ®);
| ^
16 errors generated.
vim +179 drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c
176
177 static unsigned long get_nr_lfa_components(void)
178 {
> 179 struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
180
181 reg.a0 = LFA_1_0_FN_GET_INFO;
182 reg.a1 = 0; /* lfa_info_selector = 0 */
183
> 184 arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(®, ®);
185 if (reg.a0 != LFA_SUCCESS)
186 return reg.a0;
187
188 return reg.a1;
189 }
190
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-19 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-19 12:27 [PATCH 0/1] Arm Live Firmware Activation (LFA) support Salman Nabi
2026-01-19 12:27 ` [PATCH 1/1] firmware: smccc: add support for Live Firmware Activation (LFA) Salman Nabi
2026-01-19 16:29 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-19 16:41 ` Andre Przywara
2026-01-19 18:41 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-19 21:35 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-01-27 23:01 ` Vedashree Vidwans
2026-01-29 17:26 ` Andre Przywara
2026-01-30 19:29 ` Vedashree Vidwans
2026-01-30 20:31 ` Andre Przywara
2026-01-31 1:35 ` Trilok Soni
2026-02-02 15:52 ` Salman Nabi
2026-02-06 6:37 ` Trilok Soni
2026-02-10 22:20 ` Vedashree Vidwans
2026-02-20 17:39 ` Andre Przywara
2026-02-20 17:39 ` Andre Przywara
2026-02-20 21:48 ` Trilok Soni
2026-03-13 9:46 ` Nirmoy Das
2026-03-13 14:39 ` Andre Przywara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202601200543.EKFOBfnW-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=salman.nabi@arm.com \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=vvidwans@nvidia.com \
--cc=vwadekar@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.