From: Daniel Hodges <git@danielhodges.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Hodges <git@danielhodges.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/7] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_crypto_hash kfunc
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 13:46:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260120184701.23082-6-git@danielhodges.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260120184701.23082-1-git@danielhodges.dev>
Add selftests to validate the bpf_crypto_hash works properly. The tests
verify both correct functionality and proper error handling.
Test Data:
All tests use the well-known NIST test vector input "abc" and validate
against the standardized expected outputs for each algorithm. This ensures
the BPF kfunc wrappers correctly delegate to the kernel crypto library.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hodges <git@danielhodges.dev>
---
MAINTAINERS | 2 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_hash.c | 210 ++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_common.h | 2 +
.../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_hash.c | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 451 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_hash.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_hash.c
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 62d712a1f730..d23ea38b606f 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -4718,6 +4718,8 @@ F: crypto/bpf_crypto_sig.c
F: crypto/bpf_crypto_skcipher.c
F: include/linux/bpf_crypto.h
F: kernel/bpf/crypto.c
+F: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_hash.c
+F: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_hash.c
BPF [DOCUMENTATION] (Related to Standardization)
R: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
index 558839e3c185..814804f71780 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y
CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_HMAC=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256=y
+CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512=y
+CONFIG_CRYPTO_HASH2=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_HASH=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_SKCIPHER=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_hash.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_hash.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0c78b5f46c9c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_hash.c
@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include "crypto_hash.skel.h"
+
+/* NIST test vectors for SHA-256("abc") */
+static const unsigned char expected_sha256[32] = {
+ 0xba, 0x78, 0x16, 0xbf, 0x8f, 0x01, 0xcf, 0xea,
+ 0x41, 0x41, 0x40, 0xde, 0x5d, 0xae, 0x22, 0x23,
+ 0xb0, 0x03, 0x61, 0xa3, 0x96, 0x17, 0x7a, 0x9c,
+ 0xb4, 0x10, 0xff, 0x61, 0xf2, 0x00, 0x15, 0xad
+};
+
+/* NIST test vectors for SHA-384("abc") */
+static const unsigned char expected_sha384[48] = {
+ 0xcb, 0x00, 0x75, 0x3f, 0x45, 0xa3, 0x5e, 0x8b,
+ 0xb5, 0xa0, 0x3d, 0x69, 0x9a, 0xc6, 0x50, 0x07,
+ 0x27, 0x2c, 0x32, 0xab, 0x0e, 0xde, 0xd1, 0x63,
+ 0x1a, 0x8b, 0x60, 0x5a, 0x43, 0xff, 0x5b, 0xed,
+ 0x80, 0x86, 0x07, 0x2b, 0xa1, 0xe7, 0xcc, 0x23,
+ 0x58, 0xba, 0xec, 0xa1, 0x34, 0xc8, 0x25, 0xa7
+};
+
+/* NIST test vectors for SHA-512("abc") */
+static const unsigned char expected_sha512[64] = {
+ 0xdd, 0xaf, 0x35, 0xa1, 0x93, 0x61, 0x7a, 0xba,
+ 0xcc, 0x41, 0x73, 0x49, 0xae, 0x20, 0x41, 0x31,
+ 0x12, 0xe6, 0xfa, 0x4e, 0x89, 0xa9, 0x7e, 0xa2,
+ 0x0a, 0x9e, 0xee, 0xe6, 0x4b, 0x55, 0xd3, 0x9a,
+ 0x21, 0x92, 0x99, 0x2a, 0x27, 0x4f, 0xc1, 0xa8,
+ 0x36, 0xba, 0x3c, 0x23, 0xa3, 0xfe, 0xeb, 0xbd,
+ 0x45, 0x4d, 0x44, 0x23, 0x64, 0x3c, 0xe8, 0x0e,
+ 0x2a, 0x9a, 0xc9, 0x4f, 0xa5, 0x4c, 0xa4, 0x9f
+};
+
+static struct crypto_hash *setup_skel(void)
+{
+ struct crypto_hash *skel;
+
+ skel = crypto_hash__open_and_load();
+ if (!skel) {
+ /* Skip if kfuncs not available (CONFIG_CRYPTO_HASH2 not set) */
+ if (errno == ENOENT || errno == EINVAL) {
+ test__skip();
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "crypto_hash__open_and_load");
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return skel;
+}
+
+static void test_sha256_basic(void)
+{
+ struct crypto_hash *skel;
+ int err, prog_fd;
+
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+ skel = setup_skel();
+ if (!skel)
+ return;
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_sha256);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "test_sha256");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->sha256_status, 0, "sha256_status");
+ ASSERT_EQ(memcmp(skel->bss->sha256_output, expected_sha256, 32), 0,
+ "sha256_output_match");
+
+ crypto_hash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_sha384_basic(void)
+{
+ struct crypto_hash *skel;
+ int err, prog_fd;
+
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+ skel = setup_skel();
+ if (!skel)
+ return;
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_sha384);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "test_sha384");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->sha384_status, 0, "sha384_status");
+ ASSERT_EQ(memcmp(skel->bss->sha384_output, expected_sha384, 48), 0,
+ "sha384_output_match");
+
+ crypto_hash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_sha512_basic(void)
+{
+ struct crypto_hash *skel;
+ int err, prog_fd;
+
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+ skel = setup_skel();
+ if (!skel)
+ return;
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_sha512);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "test_sha512");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->sha512_status, 0, "sha512_status");
+ ASSERT_EQ(memcmp(skel->bss->sha512_output, expected_sha512, 64), 0,
+ "sha512_output_match");
+
+ crypto_hash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_sha256_invalid_params(void)
+{
+ struct crypto_hash *skel;
+ int err, prog_fd;
+
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+ skel = setup_skel();
+ if (!skel)
+ return;
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_sha256_zero_len);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "test_zero_len");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->sha256_status, 0, "zero_len_rejected");
+
+ crypto_hash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_hash_with_key_rejected(void)
+{
+ struct crypto_hash *skel;
+ int err, prog_fd;
+
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+ skel = setup_skel();
+ if (!skel)
+ return;
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_hash_with_key_rejected);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "test_hash_with_key_rejected");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->hash_with_key_status, 0, "hash_with_key_rejected");
+
+ crypto_hash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_hash_output_too_small(void)
+{
+ struct crypto_hash *skel;
+ int err, prog_fd;
+
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+ skel = setup_skel();
+ if (!skel)
+ return;
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_hash_output_too_small);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "test_hash_output_too_small");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->hash_output_too_small_status, 0, "hash_output_too_small");
+
+ crypto_hash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_hash_on_skcipher_ctx(void)
+{
+ struct crypto_hash *skel;
+ int err, prog_fd;
+
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+ skel = setup_skel();
+ if (!skel)
+ return;
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_hash_on_skcipher_ctx);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "test_hash_on_skcipher_ctx");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->hash_on_skcipher_status, 0, "hash_on_skcipher_rejected");
+
+ crypto_hash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void test_crypto_hash(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("sha256_basic"))
+ test_sha256_basic();
+ if (test__start_subtest("sha384_basic"))
+ test_sha384_basic();
+ if (test__start_subtest("sha512_basic"))
+ test_sha512_basic();
+ if (test__start_subtest("sha256_invalid_params"))
+ test_sha256_invalid_params();
+ if (test__start_subtest("hash_with_key_rejected"))
+ test_hash_with_key_rejected();
+ if (test__start_subtest("hash_output_too_small"))
+ test_hash_output_too_small();
+ if (test__start_subtest("hash_on_skcipher_ctx"))
+ test_hash_on_skcipher_ctx();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_common.h
index 57dd7a68a8c3..2f04f08f890b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_common.h
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ int bpf_crypto_encrypt(struct bpf_crypto_ctx *ctx, const struct bpf_dynptr *src,
const struct bpf_dynptr *dst, const struct bpf_dynptr *iv) __ksym;
int bpf_crypto_decrypt(struct bpf_crypto_ctx *ctx, const struct bpf_dynptr *src,
const struct bpf_dynptr *dst, const struct bpf_dynptr *iv) __ksym;
+int bpf_crypto_hash(struct bpf_crypto_ctx *ctx, const struct bpf_dynptr *data,
+ const struct bpf_dynptr *out) __ksym;
struct __crypto_ctx_value {
struct bpf_crypto_ctx __kptr * ctx;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_hash.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_hash.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e6eacbc40607
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_hash.c
@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
+#include "crypto_common.h"
+
+unsigned char test_input[3] = "abc";
+
+/* Expected SHA-256 hash of "abc" */
+/* ba7816bf 8f01cfea 414140de 5dae2223 b00361a3 96177a9c b410ff61 f20015ad */
+unsigned char expected_sha256[32] = {
+ 0xba, 0x78, 0x16, 0xbf, 0x8f, 0x01, 0xcf, 0xea,
+ 0x41, 0x41, 0x40, 0xde, 0x5d, 0xae, 0x22, 0x23,
+ 0xb0, 0x03, 0x61, 0xa3, 0x96, 0x17, 0x7a, 0x9c,
+ 0xb4, 0x10, 0xff, 0x61, 0xf2, 0x00, 0x15, 0xad
+};
+
+/* Output buffers for test results */
+unsigned char sha256_output[32] = {};
+unsigned char sha384_output[48] = {};
+unsigned char sha512_output[64] = {};
+unsigned char small_output[16] = {}; /* Intentionally small for output_too_small test */
+
+int sha256_status = -1;
+int sha384_status = -1;
+int sha512_status = -1;
+int hash_with_key_status = -1;
+int hash_output_too_small_status = -1;
+int hash_on_skcipher_status = -1;
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int test_sha256(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_dynptr input_ptr, output_ptr;
+ struct bpf_crypto_ctx *hash_ctx;
+ struct bpf_crypto_params params = {
+ .type = "hash",
+ .algo = "sha256",
+ .key_len = 0,
+ };
+ int err = 0;
+
+ hash_ctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create(¶ms, sizeof(params), &err);
+ if (!hash_ctx) {
+ sha256_status = err;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(test_input, sizeof(test_input), 0, &input_ptr);
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(sha256_output, sizeof(sha256_output), 0, &output_ptr);
+
+ sha256_status = bpf_crypto_hash(hash_ctx, &input_ptr, &output_ptr);
+ bpf_crypto_ctx_release(hash_ctx);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int test_sha384(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_dynptr input_ptr, output_ptr;
+ struct bpf_crypto_ctx *hash_ctx;
+ struct bpf_crypto_params params = {
+ .type = "hash",
+ .algo = "sha384",
+ .key_len = 0,
+ };
+ int err = 0;
+
+ hash_ctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create(¶ms, sizeof(params), &err);
+ if (!hash_ctx) {
+ sha384_status = err;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(test_input, sizeof(test_input), 0, &input_ptr);
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(sha384_output, sizeof(sha384_output), 0, &output_ptr);
+
+ sha384_status = bpf_crypto_hash(hash_ctx, &input_ptr, &output_ptr);
+ bpf_crypto_ctx_release(hash_ctx);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int test_sha512(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_dynptr input_ptr, output_ptr;
+ struct bpf_crypto_ctx *hash_ctx;
+ struct bpf_crypto_params params = {
+ .type = "hash",
+ .algo = "sha512",
+ .key_len = 0,
+ };
+ int err = 0;
+
+ hash_ctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create(¶ms, sizeof(params), &err);
+ if (!hash_ctx) {
+ sha512_status = err;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(test_input, sizeof(test_input), 0, &input_ptr);
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(sha512_output, sizeof(sha512_output), 0, &output_ptr);
+
+ sha512_status = bpf_crypto_hash(hash_ctx, &input_ptr, &output_ptr);
+ bpf_crypto_ctx_release(hash_ctx);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int test_sha256_zero_len(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_dynptr input_ptr, output_ptr;
+ struct bpf_crypto_ctx *hash_ctx;
+ struct bpf_crypto_params params = {
+ .type = "hash",
+ .algo = "sha256",
+ .key_len = 0,
+ };
+ int err = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ hash_ctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create(¶ms, sizeof(params), &err);
+ if (!hash_ctx) {
+ sha256_status = err;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(test_input, 0, 0, &input_ptr);
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(sha256_output, sizeof(sha256_output), 0, &output_ptr);
+
+ ret = bpf_crypto_hash(hash_ctx, &input_ptr, &output_ptr);
+ sha256_status = (ret == -22) ? 0 : ret;
+ bpf_crypto_ctx_release(hash_ctx);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Test that hash context creation with a key is rejected */
+SEC("syscall")
+int test_hash_with_key_rejected(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_crypto_ctx *hash_ctx;
+ struct bpf_crypto_params params = {
+ .type = "hash",
+ .algo = "sha256",
+ .key_len = 16, /* Hash algorithms don't support keys */
+ };
+ int err = 0;
+
+ /* Set some dummy key data */
+ params.key[0] = 0x01;
+ params.key[1] = 0x02;
+
+ hash_ctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create(¶ms, sizeof(params), &err);
+ if (!hash_ctx) {
+ /* Expected: should fail with -EINVAL (-22) */
+ hash_with_key_status = (err == -22) ? 0 : err;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Should not reach here - context creation should have failed */
+ hash_with_key_status = -1;
+ bpf_crypto_ctx_release(hash_ctx);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Test that hash with output buffer too small is rejected */
+SEC("syscall")
+int test_hash_output_too_small(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_dynptr input_ptr, output_ptr;
+ struct bpf_crypto_ctx *hash_ctx;
+ struct bpf_crypto_params params = {
+ .type = "hash",
+ .algo = "sha256",
+ .key_len = 0,
+ };
+ int err = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ hash_ctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create(¶ms, sizeof(params), &err);
+ if (!hash_ctx) {
+ hash_output_too_small_status = err;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(test_input, sizeof(test_input), 0, &input_ptr);
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(small_output, sizeof(small_output), 0, &output_ptr);
+
+ ret = bpf_crypto_hash(hash_ctx, &input_ptr, &output_ptr);
+ /* Expected: should fail with -EINVAL (-22) */
+ hash_output_too_small_status = (ret == -22) ? 0 : ret;
+ bpf_crypto_ctx_release(hash_ctx);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Test that calling bpf_crypto_hash on skcipher context fails */
+SEC("syscall")
+int test_hash_on_skcipher_ctx(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_dynptr input_ptr, output_ptr;
+ struct bpf_crypto_ctx *cipher_ctx;
+ struct bpf_crypto_params params = {
+ .type = "skcipher",
+ .algo = "ecb(aes)",
+ .key_len = 16,
+ };
+ int err = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Set a valid AES-128 key */
+ params.key[0] = 0x00; params.key[1] = 0x01; params.key[2] = 0x02; params.key[3] = 0x03;
+ params.key[4] = 0x04; params.key[5] = 0x05; params.key[6] = 0x06; params.key[7] = 0x07;
+ params.key[8] = 0x08; params.key[9] = 0x09; params.key[10] = 0x0a; params.key[11] = 0x0b;
+ params.key[12] = 0x0c; params.key[13] = 0x0d; params.key[14] = 0x0e; params.key[15] = 0x0f;
+
+ cipher_ctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create(¶ms, sizeof(params), &err);
+ if (!cipher_ctx) {
+ hash_on_skcipher_status = err;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(test_input, sizeof(test_input), 0, &input_ptr);
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(sha256_output, sizeof(sha256_output), 0, &output_ptr);
+
+ ret = bpf_crypto_hash(cipher_ctx, &input_ptr, &output_ptr);
+ /* Expected: should fail with -EINVAL (-22) due to type_id mismatch */
+ hash_on_skcipher_status = (ret == -22) ? 0 : ret;
+ bpf_crypto_ctx_release(cipher_ctx);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-20 18:46 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/7] Add cryptographic hash and signature verification kfuncs to BPF Daniel Hodges
2026-01-20 18:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/7] bpf: Extend bpf_crypto_type with hash operations Daniel Hodges
2026-01-20 18:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/7] crypto: Add BPF hash algorithm type registration module Daniel Hodges
2026-01-20 19:13 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-23 7:44 ` XIAO WU
2026-01-20 18:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/7] crypto: Add BPF signature " Daniel Hodges
2026-01-20 19:13 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-20 18:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/7] bpf: Add hash kfunc for cryptographic hashing Daniel Hodges
2026-01-20 18:46 ` Daniel Hodges [this message]
2026-01-20 18:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/7] bpf: Add signature verification kfuncs Daniel Hodges
2026-01-20 18:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add tests for " Daniel Hodges
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260120184701.23082-6-git@danielhodges.dev \
--to=git@danielhodges.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.