All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: PCI: simplify code with acpi_get_local_u64_address()
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 15:15:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202601211405.APuSRTdE-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260120154015.1764021-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

Hi Andy,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on pci/next]
[also build test WARNING on pci/for-linus linus/master v6.19-rc6 next-20260120]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andy-Shevchenko/ACPI-PCI-simplify-code-with-acpi_get_local_u64_address/20260121-004826
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260120154015.1764021-1-andriy.shevchenko%40linux.intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: PCI: simplify code with acpi_get_local_u64_address()
config: x86_64-randconfig-161-20260121 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260121/202601211405.APuSRTdE-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-13 (Debian 13.3.0-16) 13.3.0
smatch version: v0.5.0-8985-g2614ff1a
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260121/202601211405.APuSRTdE-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601211405.APuSRTdE-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c: In function 'check_slot':
>> drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:60:9: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
      60 |         if (acpi_get_local_u64_address(handle, &adr))
         |         ^~
   drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:63:17: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if'
      63 |                 goto out;
         |                 ^~~~
   drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:63:17: error: label 'out' used but not defined
>> drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:44:13: warning: unused variable 'device' [-Wunused-variable]
      44 |         int device = -1;
         |             ^~~~~~
>> drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:64:9: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]
      64 |         }
         |         ^
   drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c: At top level:
>> drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:67:9: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
      67 |         status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SUN", NULL, sun);
         |         ^~~~~~
   drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:67:9: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'status' [-Werror=implicit-int]
   drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:67:40: error: 'handle' undeclared here (not in a function)
      67 |         status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SUN", NULL, sun);
         |                                        ^~~~~~
   drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:67:62: error: 'sun' undeclared here (not in a function)
      67 |         status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SUN", NULL, sun);
         |                                                              ^~~
   drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:68:9: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'if'
      68 |         if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
         |         ^~
   drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:74:9: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
      74 |         device = (adr >> 16) & 0xffff;
         |         ^~~~~~
   drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:74:9: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'device' [-Werror=implicit-int]
   drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:74:19: error: 'adr' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'idr'?
      74 |         device = (adr >> 16) & 0xffff;
         |                   ^~~
         |                   idr
   drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:75:4: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before ':' token
      75 | out:
         |    ^
   drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:77:9: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'
      77 |         return device;
         |         ^~~~~~
   drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c:78:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
      78 | }
         | ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +/if +60 drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c

    40	
    41	static int
    42	check_slot(acpi_handle handle, unsigned long long *sun)
    43	{
  > 44		int device = -1;
    45		unsigned long long sta;
    46		acpi_status status;
    47		u64 adr;
    48		struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
    49	
    50		acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
    51		pr_debug("Checking slot on path: %s\n", (char *)buffer.pointer);
    52	
    53		if (check_sta_before_sun) {
    54			/* If SxFy doesn't have _STA, we just assume it's there */
    55			status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta);
    56			if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT))
    57				goto out;
    58		}
    59	
  > 60		if (acpi_get_local_u64_address(handle, &adr))
    61			pr_debug("_ADR returned with failure on %s\n",
    62				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
  > 63			goto out;
  > 64		}
    65	
    66		/* No _SUN == not a slot == bail */
  > 67		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SUN", NULL, sun);
    68		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
    69			pr_debug("_SUN returned %d on %s\n",
    70				 status, (char *)buffer.pointer);
    71			goto out;
    72		}
    73	
    74		device = (adr >> 16) & 0xffff;
    75	out:
    76		kfree(buffer.pointer);
    77		return device;
    78	}
    79	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-21  7:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-20 15:40 [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: PCI: simplify code with acpi_get_local_u64_address() Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-21  1:44 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-21  2:39 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-21  7:15 ` kernel test robot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202601211405.APuSRTdE-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.