All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	cem@kernel.org, r772577952@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: check the return value of xchk_xfile_*_descr calls
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 06:57:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260122055748.GA23964@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260121182208.GH5945@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 10:22:08AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > xchk_xfile_*_descr is used to pass the name to xfarray_create or
> > xfblob_create.  I still think it would make this a lot more robust if
> > those took a format string and varags, and then we'd have wrappers for
> > the common types.  Even if that still ends up doing kasprintf underneath,
> > that would be isolated to the low-level functions that only need to
> > implement error handling and freeing once.
> 
> Alternately we just drop all the helpers and kasprintf crap in favor of
> feeding the raw string ("iunlinked next pointers") all the way through
> to shmem_kernel_file_setup.

But wouldn't we get duplicate names for different inodes?

Anyway, I did a quick take at format string / varags version of the
helpers, and that works out nicely, but that _descr macros still confuse
me a bit.  Maybe I'll have something until the start of your Thursday.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-22  5:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-21  6:40 [PATCHSET] xfs: syzbot fixes for online fsck Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-21  6:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: check the return value of xchk_xfile_*_descr calls Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-21  7:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-21 18:22     ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-22  5:57       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-01-22 18:57         ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23  5:33           ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23  7:00             ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-21  6:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: only call xf{array,blob}_destroy if we have a valid pointer Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-05 19:40   ` Chris Mason
2026-02-06  4:46     ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-21  6:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: check return value of xchk_scrub_create_subord Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-21  7:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-21  6:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: fix UAF in xchk_btree_check_block_owner Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-21  7:04   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260122055748.GA23964@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=r772577952@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.