From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: sunliming <sunliming@linux.dev>
Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sunliming <sunliming@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: kprobe-event: Return directly when dyn_event_list is empty
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 23:21:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260125232139.0e971011@robin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01b1d5a3-8be0-4d9a-45d4-4da7c3edf746@linux.dev>
On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 10:56:59 +0800
sunliming <sunliming@linux.dev> wrote:
> During kernel boot, the setup_boot_kprobe_events() function causes
> significant delays, increasing overall startup time.
>
> The root cause is a lock contention chain: its child function
>
> enable_boot_kprobe_events() requires the event_mutex, which is already
>
> held by early_event_add_tracer(). early_event_add_tracer() itself is
> blocked
Ah, early_event_add_tracer() is called by the work function that sets
up tracers (and the event directories within them).
>
> waiting for the trace_event_sem read-write lock, which is held for an
> extended
>
> period by trace_event_update_all(). trace_event_update_all() is
> runing in
>
> eval_map_work_func() in eval_map_wq.
>
> On my ARM64 platform machine, the latency can reach around 200ms:
>
> [ 0.268848] trace_kprobe: try_get_event_mutex
> kernel/trace/tracekprobe.c,1902,enable_boot_kprobe_events
> [ 0.268849] try down_write
> kernel/trace/traceevents.c,4114,early_event_add_tracer
> [ 0.482382] done up_write
> kernel/trace/trace_events.c,3074,trace_event_eval_update
> [ 0.482386] done down_write
> kernel/trace/trace_events.c,4116,early_event_add_tracer
> [ 0.482868] done up_write
> kernel/trace/trace_events.c,4119,early_event_add_tracer
> [ 0.482877] trace_kprobe: enable_boot_kprobe_events geted eventmutex
> [ 0.482879] trace_kprobe: enable_bootk_probe_events release eventmutex
I take it that you are aware of this work, as it comes from someone
with the same email domain as you have.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260122032051.386331-1-tianyaxiong@kylinos.cn/
That is moving the kprobe setup into the same work function.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-26 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-23 1:36 [PATCH] tracing: kprobe-event: Return directly when dyn_event_list is empty sunliming
2026-01-24 17:02 ` Steven Rostedt
[not found] ` <01b1d5a3-8be0-4d9a-45d4-4da7c3edf746@linux.dev>
2026-01-26 4:21 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
[not found] ` <78dbbd83-8de3-2031-6db7-036d0d8c11c5@linux.dev>
2026-01-26 14:38 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260125232139.0e971011@robin \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=sunliming@kylinos.cn \
--cc=sunliming@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.