All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
	phasta@mailbox.org, tursulin@ursulin.net,
	matthew.brost@intel.com, sumit.semwal@linaro.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] dma-buf: inline spinlock for fence protection v4
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 12:56:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202601271204.Yb3rgz99-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260120105655.7134-6-christian.koenig@amd.com>

Hi Christian,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on drm-misc/drm-misc-next]
[also build test ERROR on drm-xe/drm-xe-next drm-tip/drm-tip next-20260126]
[cannot apply to linus/master v6.19-rc7]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-K-nig/dma-buf-protected-fence-ops-by-RCU-v5/20260120-195535
base:   https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/misc/kernel.git drm-misc-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260120105655.7134-6-christian.koenig%40amd.com
patch subject: [PATCH 5/9] dma-buf: inline spinlock for fence protection v4
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260127/202601271204.Yb3rgz99-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260127/202601271204.Yb3rgz99-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601271204.Yb3rgz99-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:63,
                    from include/linux/sched.h:37,
                    from include/linux/kthread.h:6,
                    from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c:6:
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c: In function '__dma_fence_signal__notify':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c:151:34: error: 'struct dma_fence' has no member named 'lock'
     151 |         lockdep_assert_held(fence->lock);
         |                                  ^~
   include/linux/lockdep.h:392:61: note: in definition of macro 'lockdep_assert_held'
     392 | #define lockdep_assert_held(l)                  do { (void)(l); } while (0)
         |                                                             ^
--
   In file included from include/linux/debugobjects.h:6,
                    from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:7:
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c: In function '__i915_active_fence_set':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1048:32: error: 'struct dma_fence' has no member named 'lock'
    1048 |         spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags);
         |                                ^~
   include/linux/spinlock.h:244:48: note: in definition of macro 'raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
     244 |                 flags = _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock);   \
         |                                                ^~~~
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1048:9: note: in expansion of macro 'spin_lock_irqsave'
    1048 |         spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags);
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1050:38: error: 'struct dma_fence' has no member named 'lock'
    1050 |                 spin_lock_nested(prev->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
         |                                      ^~
   include/linux/spinlock.h:235:44: note: in definition of macro 'raw_spin_lock_nested'
     235 |         _raw_spin_lock(((void)(subclass), (lock)))
         |                                            ^~~~
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1050:17: note: in expansion of macro 'spin_lock_nested'
    1050 |                 spin_lock_nested(prev->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1064:41: error: 'struct dma_fence' has no member named 'lock'
    1064 |                         spin_unlock(prev->lock);
         |                                         ^~
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1067:45: error: 'struct dma_fence' has no member named 'lock'
    1067 |                 spin_unlock_irqrestore(fence->lock, flags);
         |                                             ^~
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1072:40: error: 'struct dma_fence' has no member named 'lock'
    1072 |                 spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags);
         |                                        ^~
   include/linux/spinlock.h:244:48: note: in definition of macro 'raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
     244 |                 flags = _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock);   \
         |                                                ^~~~
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1072:17: note: in expansion of macro 'spin_lock_irqsave'
    1072 |                 spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags);
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1074:46: error: 'struct dma_fence' has no member named 'lock'
    1074 |                         spin_lock_nested(prev->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
         |                                              ^~
   include/linux/spinlock.h:235:44: note: in definition of macro 'raw_spin_lock_nested'
     235 |         _raw_spin_lock(((void)(subclass), (lock)))
         |                                            ^~~~
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1074:25: note: in expansion of macro 'spin_lock_nested'
    1074 |                         spin_lock_nested(prev->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
         |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1091:33: error: 'struct dma_fence' has no member named 'lock'
    1091 |                 spin_unlock(prev->lock); /* serialise with prev->cb_list */
         |                                 ^~
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1094:37: error: 'struct dma_fence' has no member named 'lock'
    1094 |         spin_unlock_irqrestore(fence->lock, flags);
         |                                     ^~


vim +151 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c

0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08  144  
0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08  145  static void
f2cb60e9a3881e Chris Wilson 2019-08-17  146  __dma_fence_signal__notify(struct dma_fence *fence,
f2cb60e9a3881e Chris Wilson 2019-08-17  147  			   const struct list_head *list)
0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08  148  {
0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08  149  	struct dma_fence_cb *cur, *tmp;
0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08  150  
0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08 @151  	lockdep_assert_held(fence->lock);
0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08  152  
f2cb60e9a3881e Chris Wilson 2019-08-17  153  	list_for_each_entry_safe(cur, tmp, list, node) {
0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08  154  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cur->node);
0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08  155  		cur->func(fence, cur);
0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08  156  	}
0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08  157  }
0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08  158  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-27  4:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-20 10:54 Independence for dma_fences! v6 Christian König
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/9] dma-buf: add dma_fence_was_initialized function v2 Christian König
2026-01-20 11:33   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-07-13  8:58   ` Jiri Slaby
2026-07-14  7:53     ` Philipp Stanner
2026-07-14  8:43       ` Philipp Stanner
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 2/9] dma-buf: protected fence ops by RCU v5 Christian König
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 3/9] dma-buf: detach fence ops on signal v2 Christian König
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 4/9] dma-buf: abstract fence locking Christian König
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 5/9] dma-buf: inline spinlock for fence protection v4 Christian König
2026-01-20 11:41   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-01-21  8:48     ` Christian König
2026-01-21  9:03       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-01-27  4:56   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 6/9] dma-buf/selftests: test RCU ops and inline lock v2 Christian König
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 7/9] dma-buf: use inline lock for the stub fence v2 Christian König
2026-01-21  9:29   ` Philipp Stanner
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] dma-buf: use inline lock for the dma-fence-array Christian König
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 9/9] dma-buf: use inline lock for the dma-fence-chain Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202601271204.Yb3rgz99-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=phasta@mailbox.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.