All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, "Dev Jain" <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Linu Cherian <Linu.Cherian@arm.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/13] arm64: mm: Wrap flush_tlb_page() around ___flush_tlb_range()
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 12:59:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260127125933.00006101@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260119172202.1681510-13-ryan.roberts@arm.com>

On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 17:21:59 +0000
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> wrote:

> Flushing a page from the tlb is just a special case of flushing a range.
> So let's rework flush_tlb_page() so that it simply wraps
> ___flush_tlb_range(). While at it, let's also update the API to take the
> same flags that we use when flushing a range. This allows us to delete
> all the ugly "_nosync", "_local" and "_nonotify" variants.
> 
> Thanks to constant folding, all of the complex looping and tlbi-by-range
> options get eliminated so that the generated code for flush_tlb_page()
> looks very similar to the previous version.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Linu Cherian <linu.cherian@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>

So this does include the use of the

Case TLBF_NOBROADCAST from previous patch, but only whilst (I think)
slightly changing behavior.

Gah.  I'm regretting looking at this series. The original code is really hard to
read :)  Rather you than me to fix it!

>  static inline void flush_tlb_kernel_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>  {
>  	const unsigned long stride = PAGE_SIZE;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index be9dab2c7d6a..f91aa686f142 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ int __ptep_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	 * flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault().
>  	 */
>  	if (dirty)
> -		local_flush_tlb_page(vma, address);
> +		__flush_tlb_page(vma, address, TLBF_NOBROADCAST);

Ultimately I think this previously did __tlbi(vale1) and now does __tlbi(vae1)
Original call was to __local_flush_tlb_page_notify_nosync()

I'd like to see that sort of change called out and explained in the patch description.
It's a broader scoped flush so not a bug, but still a functional change.

>  	return 1;
>  }
>  



  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-27 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-19 17:21 [PATCH v2 00/13] arm64: Refactor TLB invalidation API and implementation Ryan Roberts
2026-01-19 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __tlbi_level macro as a C function Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 11:12   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-19 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-range TLB invalidation Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 11:19   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-19 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] arm64: mm: Implicitly invalidate user ASID based on TLBI operation Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 11:31   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-19 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] arm64: mm: Push __TLBI_VADDR() into __tlbi_level() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 11:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-27 13:26     ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-19 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] arm64: mm: Inline __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE() into __tlbi_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 11:46   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-19 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __flush_tlb_range_op macro in C Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 12:06   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-19 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] arm64: mm: Simplify __TLBI_RANGE_NUM() macro Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 12:09   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-19 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] arm64: mm: Simplify __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 12:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-19 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] arm64: mm: Refactor flush_tlb_page() to use __tlbi_level_asid() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 12:25   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-19 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] arm64: mm: Refactor __flush_tlb_range() to take flags Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 12:28   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-19 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] arm64: mm: More flags for __flush_tlb_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 12:45   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-27 13:50     ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 14:11       ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-27 14:14         ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-27 14:47           ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-19 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] arm64: mm: Wrap flush_tlb_page() around ___flush_tlb_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 12:59   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-01-27 14:03     ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 14:08       ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-19 17:22 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] arm64: mm: Provide level hint for flush_tlb_page() Ryan Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260127125933.00006101@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=Linu.Cherian@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.