From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: kuniyu@google.com, ncardwell@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: try to defer / return acked skbs to originating CPU
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 15:10:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260129151011.0c0e4f61@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260129150459.29419003@kernel.org>
On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 15:04:59 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > I was mostly concerned about latency spikes, I did some tests here and
> > > this seems fine.
> >
> > Looks like selftests run into the zerocopy Tx latency issue.
> > I'll drop this version from patchwork..
>
> Delaying zero copy forever is a bit of an annoyance.
> I believe the same thing can happen in net-next with UDP
> but I haven't tested to confirm.
>
> I assume the attached patch is out of question since it came up before?
>
> [0001-net-periodically-flush-the-defer-queues.patch text/x-patch (9441 bytes)]
Ugh, too many patches in my /tmp. I attached an old buggy version,
but you get the point.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-29 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-17 16:42 [PATCH net-next] tcp: try to defer / return acked skbs to originating CPU Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-17 17:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-17 18:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-01-17 23:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-18 12:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-01-19 17:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-29 23:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-29 23:10 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-02-16 16:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-02-16 17:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-16 17:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-02-16 18:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-16 18:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-02-17 21:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-17 21:56 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260129151011.0c0e4f61@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.