From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,zhangjn11@chinatelecom.cn,yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn,yangyicong@hisilicon.com,wangjinchao600@gmail.com,thorsten.blum@linux.dev,sunshx@chinatelecom.cn,song@kernel.org,mingo@kernel.org,lihuafei1@huawei.com,dianders@chromium.org,realwujing@gmail.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + watchdog-hardlockup-simplify-perf-event-probe-and-remove-per-cpu-dependency.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 15:06:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260129230635.DAF58C4CEF7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: watchdog/hardlockup: simplify perf event probe and remove per-cpu dependency
has been added to the -mm mm-nonmm-unstable branch. Its filename is
watchdog-hardlockup-simplify-perf-event-probe-and-remove-per-cpu-dependency.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/watchdog-hardlockup-simplify-perf-event-probe-and-remove-per-cpu-dependency.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various
branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there most days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Qiliang Yuan <realwujing@gmail.com>
Subject: watchdog/hardlockup: simplify perf event probe and remove per-cpu dependency
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 21:26:14 -0500
Simplify the hardlockup detector's probe path and remove its implicit
dependency on pinned per-cpu execution.
Refactor hardlockup_detector_event_create() to be stateless. Return the
created perf_event pointer to the caller instead of directly modifying the
per-cpu 'watchdog_ev' variable. This allows the probe path to safely
manage a temporary event without the risk of leaving stale pointers should
task migration occur.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260129022629.2201331-1-realwujing@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shouxin Sun <sunshx@chinatelecom.cn>
Signed-off-by: Junnan Zhang <zhangjn11@chinatelecom.cn>
Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn>
Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <realwujing@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
Cc: Wang Jinchao <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
Cc: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/watchdog_perf.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c~watchdog-hardlockup-simplify-perf-event-probe-and-remove-per-cpu-dependency
+++ a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
@@ -118,18 +118,11 @@ static void watchdog_overflow_callback(s
watchdog_hardlockup_check(smp_processor_id(), regs);
}
-static int hardlockup_detector_event_create(void)
+static struct perf_event *hardlockup_detector_event_create(unsigned int cpu)
{
- unsigned int cpu;
struct perf_event_attr *wd_attr;
struct perf_event *evt;
- /*
- * Preemption is not disabled because memory will be allocated.
- * Ensure CPU-locality by calling this in per-CPU kthread.
- */
- WARN_ON(!is_percpu_thread());
- cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
wd_attr = &wd_hw_attr;
wd_attr->sample_period = hw_nmi_get_sample_period(watchdog_thresh);
@@ -143,14 +136,7 @@ static int hardlockup_detector_event_cre
watchdog_overflow_callback, NULL);
}
- if (IS_ERR(evt)) {
- pr_debug("Perf event create on CPU %d failed with %ld\n", cpu,
- PTR_ERR(evt));
- return PTR_ERR(evt);
- }
- WARN_ONCE(this_cpu_read(watchdog_ev), "unexpected watchdog_ev leak");
- this_cpu_write(watchdog_ev, evt);
- return 0;
+ return evt;
}
/**
@@ -159,17 +145,26 @@ static int hardlockup_detector_event_cre
*/
void watchdog_hardlockup_enable(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ struct perf_event *evt;
+
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != smp_processor_id());
- if (hardlockup_detector_event_create())
+ evt = hardlockup_detector_event_create(cpu);
+ if (IS_ERR(evt)) {
+ pr_debug("Perf event create on CPU %d failed with %ld\n", cpu,
+ PTR_ERR(evt));
return;
+ }
/* use original value for check */
if (!atomic_fetch_inc(&watchdog_cpus))
pr_info("Enabled. Permanently consumes one hw-PMU counter.\n");
+ WARN_ONCE(this_cpu_read(watchdog_ev), "unexpected watchdog_ev leak");
+ this_cpu_write(watchdog_ev, evt);
+
watchdog_init_timestamp();
- perf_event_enable(this_cpu_read(watchdog_ev));
+ perf_event_enable(evt);
}
/**
@@ -263,19 +258,30 @@ bool __weak __init arch_perf_nmi_is_avai
*/
int __init watchdog_hardlockup_probe(void)
{
+ struct perf_event *evt;
+ unsigned int cpu;
int ret;
if (!arch_perf_nmi_is_available())
return -ENODEV;
- ret = hardlockup_detector_event_create();
+ if (!hw_nmi_get_sample_period(watchdog_thresh))
+ return -EINVAL;
- if (ret) {
+ /*
+ * Test hardware PMU availability by creating a temporary perf event.
+ * The event is released immediately.
+ */
+ cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+ evt = hardlockup_detector_event_create(cpu);
+ if (IS_ERR(evt)) {
pr_info("Perf NMI watchdog permanently disabled\n");
+ ret = PTR_ERR(evt);
} else {
- perf_event_release_kernel(this_cpu_read(watchdog_ev));
- this_cpu_write(watchdog_ev, NULL);
+ perf_event_release_kernel(evt);
+ ret = 0;
}
+
return ret;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from realwujing@gmail.com are
watchdog-hardlockup-simplify-perf-event-probe-and-remove-per-cpu-dependency.patch
reply other threads:[~2026-01-29 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260129230635.DAF58C4CEF7@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=lihuafei1@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=realwujing@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=sunshx@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
--cc=wangjinchao600@gmail.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=zhangjn11@chinatelecom.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.