From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
Cc: <dave@stgolabs.net>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cxl/core: Set cxlmd->endpoint to NULL by default
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 14:41:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260202144103.000016cb@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260201093002.1281858-2-ming.li@zohomail.com>
On Sun, 1 Feb 2026 17:30:01 +0800
Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com> wrote:
> CXL testing environment can trigger following trace
>
> Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000092: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
> KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000490-0x0000000000000497]
> RIP: 0010:cxl_dpa_to_region+0x105/0x1f0 [cxl_core]
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> cxl_event_trace_record+0xd1/0xa70 [cxl_core]
> __cxl_event_trace_record+0x12f/0x1e0 [cxl_core]
> cxl_mem_get_records_log+0x261/0x500 [cxl_core]
> cxl_mem_get_event_records+0x7c/0xc0 [cxl_core]
> cxl_mock_mem_probe+0xd38/0x1c60 [cxl_mock_mem]
> platform_probe+0x9d/0x130
> really_probe+0x1c8/0x960
> __driver_probe_device+0x187/0x3e0
> driver_probe_device+0x45/0x120
> __device_attach_driver+0x15d/0x280
>
> commit 29317f8dc6ed ("cxl/mem: Introduce cxl_memdev_attach for CXL-dependent operation")
> initializes cxlmd->endpoint to ERR_PTR(-ENXIO) in cxl_memdev_alloc().
> However, cxl_dpa_to_region() treats a non-NULL cxlmd->endpoint as a
> valid endpoint.
>
> Across the CXL core, endpoint availability is generally determined by
> checking whether it is NULL. Align with this convention by initializing
> cxlmd->endpoint to NULL by default.
I had a look at whether it made sense to use use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to check
for validity of the endpoint, but it would be somewhat fiddly and I think
you are correct that convention here seems to be NULL means not set.
We don't need the error code. One comment inline.
Either way nice catch
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
>
> Fixes: 29317f8dc6ed ("cxl/mem: Introduce cxl_memdev_attach for CXL-dependent operation")
> Signed-off-by: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> index af3d0cc65138..41a507b5daa4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ static struct cxl_memdev *cxl_memdev_alloc(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
> cxlmd->id = rc;
> cxlmd->depth = -1;
> cxlmd->attach = attach;
> - cxlmd->endpoint = ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
> + cxlmd->endpoint = NULL;
cxlmd has just been allocated with kzalloc so I'd argue we don't need this to be explicitly
set at all. Seems like a natural and safe default.
>
> dev = &cxlmd->dev;
> device_initialize(dev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-01 9:30 [PATCH 0/2] Fix port enumeration failure and NULL endpoint issue Li Ming
2026-02-01 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] cxl/core: Set cxlmd->endpoint to NULL by default Li Ming
2026-02-02 14:41 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-02-02 15:48 ` Gregory Price
2026-02-03 14:15 ` Li Ming
2026-02-02 21:04 ` Dave Jiang
2026-02-03 15:04 ` Li Ming
2026-02-03 0:01 ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-03 15:15 ` Li Ming
2026-02-03 22:37 ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-01 9:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] cxl/core: Hold grandparent port lock while dport adding Li Ming
2026-02-02 15:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-03 14:23 ` Li Ming
2026-02-03 21:14 ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-02 16:31 ` Gregory Price
2026-02-03 14:33 ` Li Ming
2026-02-03 0:07 ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-03 15:21 ` Li Ming
2026-02-03 22:25 ` dan.j.williams
2026-02-04 13:51 ` Li Ming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260202144103.000016cb@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.