All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Hodges <git@danielhodges.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yatsenko@meta.com,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, haoluo@google.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	sdf@fomichev.me, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Hodges <git@danielhodges.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_crypto_hash kfunc
Date: Mon,  2 Feb 2026 09:47:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260202144749.22932-3-git@danielhodges.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260202144749.22932-1-git@danielhodges.dev>

Add selftests to validate the bpf_crypto_hash works properly. The tests
verify both correct functionality and proper error handling.

Test Data:
All tests use the well-known NIST test vector input "abc" and validate
against the standardized expected outputs for each algorithm. This ensures
the BPF kfunc wrappers correctly delegate to the kernel crypto library.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Hodges <git@danielhodges.dev>
---
 MAINTAINERS                                   |   2 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config            |   2 +
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_hash.c    | 210 ++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_common.h       |   2 +
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_hash.c | 231 ++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 447 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_hash.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_hash.c

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 4e9b369acd1c..9602b6216ab9 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -4717,6 +4717,8 @@ F:	crypto/bpf_crypto_shash.c
 F:	crypto/bpf_crypto_skcipher.c
 F:	include/linux/bpf_crypto.h
 F:	kernel/bpf/crypto.c
+F:	tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_hash.c
+F:	tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_hash.c
 
 BPF [DOCUMENTATION] (Related to Standardization)
 R:	David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
index 558839e3c185..814804f71780 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y
 CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF=y
 CONFIG_CRYPTO_HMAC=y
 CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256=y
+CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512=y
+CONFIG_CRYPTO_HASH2=y
 CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API=y
 CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_HASH=y
 CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_SKCIPHER=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_hash.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_hash.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0c78b5f46c9c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_hash.c
@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include "crypto_hash.skel.h"
+
+/* NIST test vectors for SHA-256("abc") */
+static const unsigned char expected_sha256[32] = {
+	0xba, 0x78, 0x16, 0xbf, 0x8f, 0x01, 0xcf, 0xea,
+	0x41, 0x41, 0x40, 0xde, 0x5d, 0xae, 0x22, 0x23,
+	0xb0, 0x03, 0x61, 0xa3, 0x96, 0x17, 0x7a, 0x9c,
+	0xb4, 0x10, 0xff, 0x61, 0xf2, 0x00, 0x15, 0xad
+};
+
+/* NIST test vectors for SHA-384("abc") */
+static const unsigned char expected_sha384[48] = {
+	0xcb, 0x00, 0x75, 0x3f, 0x45, 0xa3, 0x5e, 0x8b,
+	0xb5, 0xa0, 0x3d, 0x69, 0x9a, 0xc6, 0x50, 0x07,
+	0x27, 0x2c, 0x32, 0xab, 0x0e, 0xde, 0xd1, 0x63,
+	0x1a, 0x8b, 0x60, 0x5a, 0x43, 0xff, 0x5b, 0xed,
+	0x80, 0x86, 0x07, 0x2b, 0xa1, 0xe7, 0xcc, 0x23,
+	0x58, 0xba, 0xec, 0xa1, 0x34, 0xc8, 0x25, 0xa7
+};
+
+/* NIST test vectors for SHA-512("abc") */
+static const unsigned char expected_sha512[64] = {
+	0xdd, 0xaf, 0x35, 0xa1, 0x93, 0x61, 0x7a, 0xba,
+	0xcc, 0x41, 0x73, 0x49, 0xae, 0x20, 0x41, 0x31,
+	0x12, 0xe6, 0xfa, 0x4e, 0x89, 0xa9, 0x7e, 0xa2,
+	0x0a, 0x9e, 0xee, 0xe6, 0x4b, 0x55, 0xd3, 0x9a,
+	0x21, 0x92, 0x99, 0x2a, 0x27, 0x4f, 0xc1, 0xa8,
+	0x36, 0xba, 0x3c, 0x23, 0xa3, 0xfe, 0xeb, 0xbd,
+	0x45, 0x4d, 0x44, 0x23, 0x64, 0x3c, 0xe8, 0x0e,
+	0x2a, 0x9a, 0xc9, 0x4f, 0xa5, 0x4c, 0xa4, 0x9f
+};
+
+static struct crypto_hash *setup_skel(void)
+{
+	struct crypto_hash *skel;
+
+	skel = crypto_hash__open_and_load();
+	if (!skel) {
+		/* Skip if kfuncs not available (CONFIG_CRYPTO_HASH2 not set) */
+		if (errno == ENOENT || errno == EINVAL) {
+			test__skip();
+			return NULL;
+		}
+		ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "crypto_hash__open_and_load");
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	return skel;
+}
+
+static void test_sha256_basic(void)
+{
+	struct crypto_hash *skel;
+	int err, prog_fd;
+
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+	skel = setup_skel();
+	if (!skel)
+		return;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_sha256);
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_sha256");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->sha256_status, 0, "sha256_status");
+	ASSERT_EQ(memcmp(skel->bss->sha256_output, expected_sha256, 32), 0,
+		  "sha256_output_match");
+
+	crypto_hash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_sha384_basic(void)
+{
+	struct crypto_hash *skel;
+	int err, prog_fd;
+
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+	skel = setup_skel();
+	if (!skel)
+		return;
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_sha384);
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_sha384");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->sha384_status, 0, "sha384_status");
+	ASSERT_EQ(memcmp(skel->bss->sha384_output, expected_sha384, 48), 0,
+		  "sha384_output_match");
+
+	crypto_hash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_sha512_basic(void)
+{
+	struct crypto_hash *skel;
+	int err, prog_fd;
+
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+	skel = setup_skel();
+	if (!skel)
+		return;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_sha512);
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_sha512");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->sha512_status, 0, "sha512_status");
+	ASSERT_EQ(memcmp(skel->bss->sha512_output, expected_sha512, 64), 0,
+		  "sha512_output_match");
+
+	crypto_hash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_sha256_invalid_params(void)
+{
+	struct crypto_hash *skel;
+	int err, prog_fd;
+
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+	skel = setup_skel();
+	if (!skel)
+		return;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_sha256_zero_len);
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_zero_len");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->sha256_status, 0, "zero_len_rejected");
+
+	crypto_hash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_hash_with_key_rejected(void)
+{
+	struct crypto_hash *skel;
+	int err, prog_fd;
+
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+	skel = setup_skel();
+	if (!skel)
+		return;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_hash_with_key_rejected);
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_hash_with_key_rejected");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->hash_with_key_status, 0, "hash_with_key_rejected");
+
+	crypto_hash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_hash_output_too_small(void)
+{
+	struct crypto_hash *skel;
+	int err, prog_fd;
+
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+	skel = setup_skel();
+	if (!skel)
+		return;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_hash_output_too_small);
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_hash_output_too_small");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->hash_output_too_small_status, 0, "hash_output_too_small");
+
+	crypto_hash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_hash_on_skcipher_ctx(void)
+{
+	struct crypto_hash *skel;
+	int err, prog_fd;
+
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+
+	skel = setup_skel();
+	if (!skel)
+		return;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_hash_on_skcipher_ctx);
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_hash_on_skcipher_ctx");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->hash_on_skcipher_status, 0, "hash_on_skcipher_rejected");
+
+	crypto_hash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void test_crypto_hash(void)
+{
+	if (test__start_subtest("sha256_basic"))
+		test_sha256_basic();
+	if (test__start_subtest("sha384_basic"))
+		test_sha384_basic();
+	if (test__start_subtest("sha512_basic"))
+		test_sha512_basic();
+	if (test__start_subtest("sha256_invalid_params"))
+		test_sha256_invalid_params();
+	if (test__start_subtest("hash_with_key_rejected"))
+		test_hash_with_key_rejected();
+	if (test__start_subtest("hash_output_too_small"))
+		test_hash_output_too_small();
+	if (test__start_subtest("hash_on_skcipher_ctx"))
+		test_hash_on_skcipher_ctx();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_common.h
index 57dd7a68a8c3..2f04f08f890b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_common.h
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ int bpf_crypto_encrypt(struct bpf_crypto_ctx *ctx, const struct bpf_dynptr *src,
 		       const struct bpf_dynptr *dst, const struct bpf_dynptr *iv) __ksym;
 int bpf_crypto_decrypt(struct bpf_crypto_ctx *ctx, const struct bpf_dynptr *src,
 		       const struct bpf_dynptr *dst, const struct bpf_dynptr *iv) __ksym;
+int bpf_crypto_hash(struct bpf_crypto_ctx *ctx, const struct bpf_dynptr *data,
+		    const struct bpf_dynptr *out) __ksym;
 
 struct __crypto_ctx_value {
 	struct bpf_crypto_ctx __kptr * ctx;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_hash.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_hash.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0258fdbe3e71
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_hash.c
@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
+#include "crypto_common.h"
+
+unsigned char test_input[3] = "abc";
+
+/* Expected SHA-256 hash of "abc" */
+/* ba7816bf 8f01cfea 414140de 5dae2223 b00361a3 96177a9c b410ff61 f20015ad */
+unsigned char expected_sha256[32] = {
+	0xba, 0x78, 0x16, 0xbf, 0x8f, 0x01, 0xcf, 0xea,
+	0x41, 0x41, 0x40, 0xde, 0x5d, 0xae, 0x22, 0x23,
+	0xb0, 0x03, 0x61, 0xa3, 0x96, 0x17, 0x7a, 0x9c,
+	0xb4, 0x10, 0xff, 0x61, 0xf2, 0x00, 0x15, 0xad
+};
+
+/* Output buffers for test results */
+unsigned char sha256_output[32] = {};
+unsigned char sha384_output[48] = {};
+unsigned char sha512_output[64] = {};
+unsigned char small_output[16] = {}; /* Intentionally small for output_too_small test */
+
+int sha256_status = -1;
+int sha384_status = -1;
+int sha512_status = -1;
+int hash_with_key_status = -1;
+int hash_output_too_small_status = -1;
+int hash_on_skcipher_status = -1;
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int test_sha256(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct bpf_dynptr input_ptr, output_ptr;
+	struct bpf_crypto_ctx *hash_ctx;
+	struct bpf_crypto_params params = {
+		.type = "hash",
+		.algo = "sha256",
+		.key_len = 0,
+	};
+	int err = 0;
+
+	hash_ctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create(&params, sizeof(params), &err);
+	if (!hash_ctx) {
+		sha256_status = err;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	bpf_dynptr_from_mem(test_input, sizeof(test_input), 0, &input_ptr);
+	bpf_dynptr_from_mem(sha256_output, sizeof(sha256_output), 0, &output_ptr);
+
+	sha256_status = bpf_crypto_hash(hash_ctx, &input_ptr, &output_ptr);
+	bpf_crypto_ctx_release(hash_ctx);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int test_sha384(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct bpf_dynptr input_ptr, output_ptr;
+	struct bpf_crypto_ctx *hash_ctx;
+	struct bpf_crypto_params params = {
+		.type = "hash",
+		.algo = "sha384",
+		.key_len = 0,
+	};
+	int err = 0;
+
+	hash_ctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create(&params, sizeof(params), &err);
+	if (!hash_ctx) {
+		sha384_status = err;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	bpf_dynptr_from_mem(test_input, sizeof(test_input), 0, &input_ptr);
+	bpf_dynptr_from_mem(sha384_output, sizeof(sha384_output), 0, &output_ptr);
+
+	sha384_status = bpf_crypto_hash(hash_ctx, &input_ptr, &output_ptr);
+	bpf_crypto_ctx_release(hash_ctx);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int test_sha512(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct bpf_dynptr input_ptr, output_ptr;
+	struct bpf_crypto_ctx *hash_ctx;
+	struct bpf_crypto_params params = {
+		.type = "hash",
+		.algo = "sha512",
+		.key_len = 0,
+	};
+	int err = 0;
+
+	hash_ctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create(&params, sizeof(params), &err);
+	if (!hash_ctx) {
+		sha512_status = err;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	bpf_dynptr_from_mem(test_input, sizeof(test_input), 0, &input_ptr);
+	bpf_dynptr_from_mem(sha512_output, sizeof(sha512_output), 0, &output_ptr);
+
+	sha512_status = bpf_crypto_hash(hash_ctx, &input_ptr, &output_ptr);
+	bpf_crypto_ctx_release(hash_ctx);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int test_sha256_zero_len(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct bpf_dynptr input_ptr, output_ptr;
+	struct bpf_crypto_ctx *hash_ctx;
+	struct bpf_crypto_params params = {
+		.type = "hash",
+		.algo = "sha256",
+		.key_len = 0,
+	};
+	int err = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	hash_ctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create(&params, sizeof(params), &err);
+	if (!hash_ctx) {
+		sha256_status = err;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	bpf_dynptr_from_mem(test_input, 0, 0, &input_ptr);
+	bpf_dynptr_from_mem(sha256_output, sizeof(sha256_output), 0, &output_ptr);
+
+	ret = bpf_crypto_hash(hash_ctx, &input_ptr, &output_ptr);
+	sha256_status = (ret == -22) ? 0 : ret;
+	bpf_crypto_ctx_release(hash_ctx);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int test_hash_with_key_rejected(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct bpf_crypto_ctx *hash_ctx;
+	struct bpf_crypto_params params = {
+		.type = "hash",
+		.algo = "sha256",
+		.key_len = 16, /* Hash algorithms don't support keys */
+	};
+	int err = 0;
+
+	/* Set some dummy key data */
+	params.key[0] = 0x01;
+	params.key[1] = 0x02;
+
+	hash_ctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create(&params, sizeof(params), &err);
+	if (!hash_ctx) {
+		/* Expected: should fail with -EINVAL (-22) */
+		hash_with_key_status = (err == -22) ? 0 : err;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/* Should not reach here - context creation should have failed */
+	hash_with_key_status = -1;
+	bpf_crypto_ctx_release(hash_ctx);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int test_hash_output_too_small(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct bpf_dynptr input_ptr, output_ptr;
+	struct bpf_crypto_ctx *hash_ctx;
+	struct bpf_crypto_params params = {
+		.type = "hash",
+		.algo = "sha256",
+		.key_len = 0,
+	};
+	int err = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	hash_ctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create(&params, sizeof(params), &err);
+	if (!hash_ctx) {
+		hash_output_too_small_status = err;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	bpf_dynptr_from_mem(test_input, sizeof(test_input), 0, &input_ptr);
+	bpf_dynptr_from_mem(small_output, sizeof(small_output), 0, &output_ptr);
+
+	ret = bpf_crypto_hash(hash_ctx, &input_ptr, &output_ptr);
+	/* Expected: should fail with -EINVAL (-22) */
+	hash_output_too_small_status = (ret == -22) ? 0 : ret;
+	bpf_crypto_ctx_release(hash_ctx);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int test_hash_on_skcipher_ctx(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct bpf_dynptr input_ptr, output_ptr;
+	struct bpf_crypto_ctx *cipher_ctx;
+	struct bpf_crypto_params params = {
+		.type = "skcipher",
+		.algo = "ecb(aes)",
+		.key_len = 16,
+	};
+	int err = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	params.key[0] = 0x00; params.key[1] = 0x01; params.key[2] = 0x02; params.key[3] = 0x03;
+	params.key[4] = 0x04; params.key[5] = 0x05; params.key[6] = 0x06; params.key[7] = 0x07;
+	params.key[8] = 0x08; params.key[9] = 0x09; params.key[10] = 0x0a; params.key[11] = 0x0b;
+	params.key[12] = 0x0c; params.key[13] = 0x0d; params.key[14] = 0x0e; params.key[15] = 0x0f;
+
+	cipher_ctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create(&params, sizeof(params), &err);
+	if (!cipher_ctx) {
+		hash_on_skcipher_status = err;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	bpf_dynptr_from_mem(test_input, sizeof(test_input), 0, &input_ptr);
+	bpf_dynptr_from_mem(sha256_output, sizeof(sha256_output), 0, &output_ptr);
+
+	ret = bpf_crypto_hash(cipher_ctx, &input_ptr, &output_ptr);
+	/* Expected: should fail with -EINVAL (-22) due to type_id mismatch */
+	hash_on_skcipher_status = (ret == -22) ? 0 : ret;
+	bpf_crypto_ctx_release(cipher_ctx);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.52.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-02 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-02 14:47 [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/4] Add cryptographic hash and signature verification kfuncs to BPF Daniel Hodges
2026-02-02 14:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/4] bpf: Add hash kfunc for cryptographic hashing Daniel Hodges
2026-02-02 14:47 ` Daniel Hodges [this message]
2026-02-02 14:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/4] bpf: Add signature verification kfuncs Daniel Hodges
2026-02-02 15:20   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-02-03 18:44   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-04 14:47     ` Daniel Hodges
2026-02-02 14:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for " Daniel Hodges

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260202144749.22932-3-git@danielhodges.dev \
    --to=git@danielhodges.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    --cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.