Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] dma-buf: Use revoke mechanism to invalidate shared buffers

[Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 09:54:13AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> On 2/4/26 09:16, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 06:04:25PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2026 at 07:34:10AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >>> Changelog:
> >>> v7:
> >>
> >> <...>
> >>
> >>> Leon Romanovsky (8):
> >>>       dma-buf: Rename .move_notify() callback to a clearer identifier
> >>>       dma-buf: Rename dma_buf_move_notify() to dma_buf_invalidate_mappings()
> >>>       dma-buf: Always build with DMABUF_MOVE_NOTIFY
> >>>       vfio: Wait for dma-buf invalidation to complete
> >>>       dma-buf: Make .invalidate_mapping() truly optional
> >>>       dma-buf: Add dma_buf_attach_revocable()
> >>>       vfio: Permit VFIO to work with pinned importers
> >>>       iommufd: Add dma_buf_pin()
> >>>
> >>>  drivers/dma-buf/Kconfig                     | 12 -----
> >>>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c                   | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c | 14 ++---
> >>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c  |  2 +-
> >>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/Kconfig          |  2 +-
> >>>  drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_prime.c      |  2 +-
> >>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_dma_buf.c       |  7 ++-
> >>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c                  |  2 +-
> >>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c             | 14 ++---
> >>>  drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.c       | 13 -----
> >>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c             |  2 +-
> >>>  drivers/iommu/iommufd/pages.c               | 11 +++-
> >>>  drivers/iommu/iommufd/selftest.c            |  2 +-
> >>>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c          | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >>>  include/linux/dma-buf.h                     | 17 +++---
> >>>  15 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Christian,
> >>
> >> Given the ongoing discussion around patch v5, I'm a bit unclear on the
> >> current state. Is the series ready for merging, or do you need me to
> >> rework anything further?
> > 
> > Christian,
> > 
> > Let's not miss the merge window for work that is already ready.
> 
> Mhm, sounds like AMDs mail servers never send my last mail out.
> 
> As far as I can see all patches have an reviewed-by, I also gave an rb on patch #6 (should that mail never got out as well). The discussion on patch v5 is just orthogonal I think, the handling was there even completely before this patch set.
> 
> For upstreaming as long as the VFIO and infiniband folks don't object I would like to take that through the drm-misc branch (like every other DMA-buf change).

Infiniband folks don't object :).

> 
> So as long as nobody objects I can push that today, but I can't promise that Dave/Linus will take it for the 6.20 window.

Let's give it a try, at the very least.

Thanks

> 
> Regards,
> Christian.
> 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> 
>