Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] single-binary: hw/virtio

[Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1521 bytes --]

On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 09:17:03AM -0800, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
> On 2/4/26 10:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 09:27:10PM -0800, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
> > > On 2/3/26 12:56 PM, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
> > > > This series eliminates target specifics in hw/virtio and replace them with
> > > > runtime functions where needed.
> > > > 
> > > > Performance has been measured with this automated fio benchmark, with
> > > > original instructions from Stefan [1].
> > > > 
> > > > $ git clone https://github.com/pbo-linaro/qemu-linux-stack -b x86_64_io_benchmark
> > > > $ cd qemu-linux-stack
> > > > $ ./build.sh
> > > > $ ./run.sh /path/to/qemu-system-x86_64
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20260202185233.GC405548@fedora/
> > > > 
> > > > Results are on 20 runs and expressed in kIOPS:
> > > > reference: mean=239.2 std_dev=3.48
> > > > with_series: mean=238.5 std_dev=3.46
> > > > 
> > > > Performance is on par, and within standard deviation.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Does it look better to you Michael?
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Pierrick
> > 
> > 
> > better for sure. is there a reason you dropped stefanha
> > from CC? he suggested these tests...
> > 
> 
> I didn't to that intentionally, it seems like he was not added by default
> from the file set when I posted v4.
> 
> Stefan, please see cover letter above and let us know if that sounds
> acceptable to you.

Yes, the results you posted look fine. Thanks!

Stefan

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]