From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EA2B3559D0 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 09:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770370964; cv=none; b=fnqr9LLRLw3zHMAmDkvXVw1TCCopvesEbvGCu3PIBtLuCHygntVlxbImYBZ4rrSthXr+m/7dPLiLRvcSy/iD5uqWTSRdGz0Hjyer/BW4wiCnfSyloayCO9wThJfPzPy4hsZXAtfBDhiPxvdp5shUsmFFvSvDX3lBidhObuJMpeY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770370964; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n1OFGqXVrjB+SSm8eyv7Y8z2DT5P1obOJbX7zIX8BHw=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Gdmm61/UKKfg+BiflV26ZtiDf5VtMrjLoigHmHPFc4kt17dHh8jE3RSl0U7whILmxqJd3A0fgjUBrdBOkCKGSBETM7msxXR6rLDZ/XtIfgRs+bz5+S4NhBeypoV2YInYWZ1/1XK3Gli1V2lYdo407B1gN2/Tf0icqtCg82hf4NQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.224.150]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4f6pyP0YLSzJ46jG; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 17:41:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from dubpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.214.145.207]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D58F40565; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 17:42:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.15) by dubpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.214.145.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 09:42:40 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 09:42:39 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Michael Tokarev CC: Michael Tsirkin , , "Vinayak Holikatti" , , , Ravi Shankar , qemu-stable Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu 0/2] hw/cxl: Two media operations related fixes. Message-ID: <20260206094239.000065c4@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <3e767269-b39c-42e2-8283-598e16aa7b71@tls.msk.ru> References: <20260102154731.474859-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> <3e767269-b39c-42e2-8283-598e16aa7b71@tls.msk.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500009.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.84) To dubpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.214.145.207) On Fri, 6 Feb 2026 01:11:55 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 1/2/26 18:47, Jonathan Cameron via wrote: > > Peter reported both of these last cycle. Both are related to sanity > > checking parameters. > > > > Jonathan Cameron (2): > > hw/cxl: Check for overflow on santize media as both base and offset > > 64bit. > > hw/cxl: Take into account how many media operations are requested for > > param check > > > > hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c | 11 ++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Is this one worth picking up for qemu-stable (10.1.x & 10.2.x)? > They are fairly obscure features but if it applies cleanly it seems sensible to backport. Thanks Jonathan > Thanks, > > /mjt From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6104EB28FE for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 09:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1voIMX-0008VH-0q; Fri, 06 Feb 2026 04:42:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1voIMV-0008Ut-9U; Fri, 06 Feb 2026 04:42:51 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1voIMS-000670-Cy; Fri, 06 Feb 2026 04:42:51 -0500 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.224.150]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4f6pyP0YLSzJ46jG; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 17:41:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from dubpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.214.145.207]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D58F40565; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 17:42:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.15) by dubpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.214.145.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 09:42:40 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 09:42:39 +0000 To: Michael Tokarev CC: Michael Tsirkin , , "Vinayak Holikatti" , , , Ravi Shankar , qemu-stable Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu 0/2] hw/cxl: Two media operations related fixes. Message-ID: <20260206094239.000065c4@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <3e767269-b39c-42e2-8283-598e16aa7b71@tls.msk.ru> References: <20260102154731.474859-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> <3e767269-b39c-42e2-8283-598e16aa7b71@tls.msk.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.203.177.15] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500009.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.84) To dubpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.214.145.207) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.176.79.56; envelope-from=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com; helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jonathan Cameron From: Jonathan Cameron via qemu development Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Fri, 6 Feb 2026 01:11:55 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 1/2/26 18:47, Jonathan Cameron via wrote: > > Peter reported both of these last cycle. Both are related to sanity > > checking parameters. > > > > Jonathan Cameron (2): > > hw/cxl: Check for overflow on santize media as both base and offset > > 64bit. > > hw/cxl: Take into account how many media operations are requested for > > param check > > > > hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c | 11 ++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Is this one worth picking up for qemu-stable (10.1.x & 10.2.x)? > They are fairly obscure features but if it applies cleanly it seems sensible to backport. Thanks Jonathan > Thanks, > > /mjt