All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Cheng Li" <lechain@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 next 03/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Add buffering to vfprintf() callback.
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2026 23:36:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260207233651.577f0fcb@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYeSnohSJ78ADFUZ@1wt.eu>

On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 20:29:34 +0100
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 07:11:13PM +0000, david.laight.linux@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Add per-call buffering to the vprintf() callback.
> > While this adds some extra code it will speed things up and
> > makes a massive difference to anyone looking at strace output.  
> 
> This patch alone adds more than 200 extra bytes to the smallest binary
> for something that was never expressed as a need by users:
> 
>  $ size hello-patch*
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>    1859      48      24    1931     78b hello-patch1
>    2071      48      24    2143     85f hello-patch2
> 
> I doubt it would make sense to have a build option to choose this.
> Or alternately one could decide do disable it when __OPTIMIZE_SIZE__
> is defined. I just tried quickly and it does the job:

That probably makes sense.
For anything non-trivial the extra size is noise.
Actually is would be easier to read with a single #if covering the
whole lot.

> 
>   @@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ struct __nolibc_fprintf_cb_state {
>    
>    static int __nolibc_fprintf_cb(void *v_state, const char *buf, size_t size)
>    {
>   +#if !defined(__OPTIMIZE_SIZE__)
>           struct __nolibc_fprintf_cb_state *state = v_state;
>           unsigned int off = state->buf_offset;
>    
>   @@ -407,16 +408,24 @@ static int __nolibc_fprintf_cb(void *v_state, const char *buf, size_t size)
>                   memcpy(state->buf + off, buf, size);
>           }
>           return 0;
>   +#else
>   +       /* v_state is the stream */
>   +       return size ? _fwrite(buf, size, v_state) : 0;
>   +#endif
>    }
>    
>    static __attribute__((unused, format(printf, 2, 0)))
>    int vfprintf(FILE *stream, const char *fmt, va_list args)
>    {
>   +#if !defined(__OPTIMIZE_SIZE__)
>           struct __nolibc_fprintf_cb_state state;
>    
>           state.stream = stream;
>           state.buf_offset = 0;
>           return __nolibc_printf(__nolibc_fprintf_cb, &state, fmt, args);
>   +#else
>   +       return __nolibc_printf(__nolibc_fprintf_cb, stream, fmt, args);
>   +#endif
>    }
>    
>    static __attribute__((unused, format(printf, 1, 0)))
> 
> > Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes for v2:
> > Formally patch 2, unchanged.
> > 
> >  tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h b/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h
> > index 36733ecd4261..552f09d51d82 100644
> > --- a/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h
> > +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h
> > @@ -382,15 +382,41 @@ int __nolibc_printf(__nolibc_printf_cb cb, void *state, const char *fmt, va_list
> >  	return written;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int __nolibc_fprintf_cb(void *stream, const char *buf, size_t size)
> > +struct __nolibc_fprintf_cb_state {
> > +	FILE *stream;
> > +	unsigned int buf_offset;
> > +	char buf[128];
> > +};  
> 
> So that's the other state I was wondering if we could merge with the first
> one.

The snprintf state is the 'address to write the next character to'
and 'the amount of space remaining'.
No real overlap at all.

> 
> > +static int __nolibc_fprintf_cb(void *v_state, const char *buf, size_t size)
> >  {
> > -	return size ? _fwrite(buf, size, stream) : 0;
> > +	struct __nolibc_fprintf_cb_state *state = v_state;
> > +	unsigned int off = state->buf_offset;
> > +
> > +	if (off + size > sizeof(state->buf) || buf == NULL) {  
> 
> Please mention that special case of buf==NULL in a comment above the
> function. That's an internal API choice.

ok - it might just go above this line though.

	David

> 
> > +		state->buf_offset = 0;
> > +		if (off && _fwrite(state->buf, off, state->stream))
> > +			return -1;
> > +		if (size > sizeof(state->buf))
> > +			return _fwrite(buf, size, state->stream);
> > +		off = 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (size) {
> > +		state->buf_offset = off + size;
> > +		memcpy(state->buf + off, buf, size);
> > +	}
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static __attribute__((unused, format(printf, 2, 0)))
> >  int vfprintf(FILE *stream, const char *fmt, va_list args)
> >  {
> > -	return __nolibc_printf(__nolibc_fprintf_cb, stream, fmt, args);
> > +	struct __nolibc_fprintf_cb_state state;
> > +
> > +	state.stream = stream;
> > +	state.buf_offset = 0;
> > +	return __nolibc_printf(__nolibc_fprintf_cb, &state, fmt, args);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static __attribute__((unused, format(printf, 1, 0)))  
> 
> Thanks,
> Willy


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-07 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-06 19:11 [PATCH v2 next 00/11] tools/nolibc: Enhance printf() david.laight.linux
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 01/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Change variable used for format chars from 'c' to 'ch' david.laight.linux
2026-02-07 18:51   ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-16 18:52   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 02/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Move snprintf length check to callback david.laight.linux
2026-02-07 19:12   ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-07 23:28     ` David Laight
2026-02-08 15:12       ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-08 22:49         ` David Laight
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 03/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Add buffering to vfprintf() callback david.laight.linux
2026-02-07 19:29   ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-07 23:36     ` David Laight [this message]
2026-02-16 19:07       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-17 11:51         ` David Laight
2026-02-18 17:52           ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 04/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Output pad characters in 16 byte chunks david.laight.linux
2026-02-07 19:38   ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-07 23:43     ` David Laight
2026-02-08 15:14       ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-16 19:30   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-16 22:29     ` David Laight
2026-02-18 17:30       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 05/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Simplify __nolibc_printf() david.laight.linux
2026-02-07 20:05   ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-07 23:50     ` David Laight
2026-02-08 12:20       ` David Laight
2026-02-08 14:44         ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-08 16:54           ` David Laight
2026-02-08 17:06             ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 06/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Use bit-masks to hold requested flag, length and conversion chars david.laight.linux
2026-02-08 15:22   ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-16 19:52   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-16 22:47     ` David Laight
2026-02-18 17:36       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-18 22:57         ` David Laight
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 07/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Add support for conversion flags "#- +" and format "%X" david.laight.linux
2026-02-08 15:47   ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-08 17:14     ` David Laight
2026-02-08 16:06   ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-16 19:57   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-16 22:50     ` David Laight
2026-02-18 17:39       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-16 20:11   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-16 22:52     ` David Laight
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 08/11] tools/nolibc/printf: Add support for zero padding and field precision david.laight.linux
2026-02-08 16:16   ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-08 17:31     ` David Laight
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 09/11] selftests/nolibc: Improve reporting of vfprintf() errors david.laight.linux
2026-02-16 20:05   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-17 10:48     ` David Laight
2026-02-18 17:48       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 10/11] selftests/nolibc: Increase coverage of printf format tests david.laight.linux
2026-02-16 20:14   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-16 20:23   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-16 22:54     ` David Laight
2026-02-18 17:41       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-06 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 next 11/11] selftests/nolibc: Use printf("%.*s", n, "") to align output david.laight.linux
2026-02-08 16:20   ` Willy Tarreau
2026-02-16 20:22   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-06 21:36 ` [PATCH v2 next 00/11] tools/nolibc: Enhance printf() David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260207233651.577f0fcb@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=lechain@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.