From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E07E12D592F for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2026 11:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771241727; cv=none; b=k+41+M4bdZ9DUYfIV50FPMAeZO2rHJttzT0whHZWx2jlPY7aONwlL2VL8y8zBCt3r/M+Fj4O8G7sTS84KxBlpocnZL3hRxOfDw8FdVjpA6YO0ajkvubBiEDmNp6Gv9EdMYstHjaQmJEDdbZHGqwAgUFeWQrwGpprDPe3pPaagNM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771241727; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Io7VUUmHV4/TWhkmZQEqwhSGkMyubKTEgUKyxjQxnUo=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=rZkExk9t7kCjMbVdVApP/JfjA9gAx4opIy7oeFMKkt9Tm7gR45NCNc6K2e/llqoxl1knjvLrYK+vHLS1hPhg+nM7L/IVX30FlU1pgSQ0NwRVW1Pgeoz6gVpzhLZZxDzd8watszQO4lzuHpmQYVAyphgUP4r+02aHKCEXIBqtMU8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ESS8C8pO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ESS8C8pO" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1771241725; x=1802777725; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=Io7VUUmHV4/TWhkmZQEqwhSGkMyubKTEgUKyxjQxnUo=; b=ESS8C8pOPOfKZ+29w6puuV69HUyS3P2LFtfyREcx/0ueqGuLYYvnmscl S06eCXc2Qjj401StKaYjm8COZ+1KRKOLPnq/r0NUzbXaQWB9Ki/1dAE0g C66VrAhBLIxymsdgWcUbd1iBxKHo16Xhmg6rKNQlRDvb+SZlH869VJXYX qM4kEzp2iW0Z9YhaOyMTIHFhkOFDYugIgu+dPaPYYXZzqR7nOLsLUG1ro JhroSOcgIaqq+YXkNp4gksvgntCQ7i2oaJ95onjdfh/FVaXoa6ZqC91u3 kHYxBIBDZkMh+n88a0V5JXJY6OiS0MRagESMdMyNH6YnYCoYrDUwk+EvQ Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2nMFvqgQTXWkShqpGAAZ9A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MRSDTAg6RtWH+06/wHdaLA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11702"; a="71520511" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,294,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="71520511" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2026 03:35:25 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: U/xICY2iTuaOQjdS4u8mUA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 2vLudV8ISJWf7T8GBtCCZg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,294,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="251243215" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO e5404a91d123) ([10.211.93.152]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2026 03:35:25 -0800 Received: from kbuild by e5404a91d123 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vrwss-000000002Pt-1rOt for oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev; Mon, 16 Feb 2026 11:35:22 +0000 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 12:35:03 +0100 From: kernel test robot To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc64/bpf: Implement JIT support for private stack Message-ID: <202602161230.JTOEAOX1-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline :::::: :::::: Manual check reason: "high confidence checkpatch report" :::::: Manual check reason: "checkpatch report for netdev code" :::::: BCC: lkp@intel.com CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20260216152234.36632-1-adubey@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260216152234.36632-1-adubey@linux.ibm.com> TO: adubey@linux.ibm.com TO: bpf@vger.kernel.org Hi, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] [cannot apply to bpf-next/net] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/adubey-linux-ibm-com/selftests-bpf-Enable-private-stack-tests-for-powerpc64/20260216-182353 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260216152234.36632-1-adubey%40linux.ibm.com patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc64/bpf: Implement JIT support for private stack :::::: branch date: 70 minutes ago :::::: commit date: 70 minutes ago reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260216/202602161230.JTOEAOX1-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) # many are suggestions rather than must-fix ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "(foo*)" should be "(foo *)" #239: FILE: arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c:212: + priv_frame_ptr = (void*) ctx->priv_sp + PRIV_STACK_GUARD_SZ + -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki